Novel approaches for wind speed evaluating and solar-wind complementarity assessing

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Focus Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ref.2024.100547
Anas Hajou , Youness El Mghouchi , Mohamed Chaoui
{"title":"Novel approaches for wind speed evaluating and solar-wind complementarity assessing","authors":"Anas Hajou ,&nbsp;Youness El Mghouchi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Chaoui","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, a wind speed analysis is conducted using Reanalysis wind speed data for the height of 50 meters using five probability distributions that were tested and compared using the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) for estimating the distributions parameters and three goodness-of-fit tests for selecting the best fitting one, namely the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), The Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and the Anderson-Darling (AD). The wind roses, histograms, wind map and the wind power density maps were established. For complementarity between solar and wind, an assessment based on energy fluctuations is adopted and a new complementarity metric is proposed. Using reanalysis data and satellite-based data, a wind turbine model and a PV systems output data are used. This method uses a combination of normalization and a distance metric. Firstly, the outliers are removed, then the daily power output data for PV and Wind turbine are scaled using the minimum-maximum normalization. This normalization transforms both energies data into the same range of 0-1, where the minimum is equal to 0 and the maximum is equal to 1, while conserving its structure, hence, this allows for comparison between the two sources and identify days with high complementarity, for instance when one source is close to 1 and the other is close to zero. For complementarity assessment, the Euclidean distance is adopted. This distance is calculated for each between the normalized values of both sources, and it is between 0 and 1; higher distance indicates high complementarity level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000115/pdfft?md5=0178adcb1e086c3c494e3d9c5c906fb6&pid=1-s2.0-S1755008424000115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a wind speed analysis is conducted using Reanalysis wind speed data for the height of 50 meters using five probability distributions that were tested and compared using the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) for estimating the distributions parameters and three goodness-of-fit tests for selecting the best fitting one, namely the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), The Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and the Anderson-Darling (AD). The wind roses, histograms, wind map and the wind power density maps were established. For complementarity between solar and wind, an assessment based on energy fluctuations is adopted and a new complementarity metric is proposed. Using reanalysis data and satellite-based data, a wind turbine model and a PV systems output data are used. This method uses a combination of normalization and a distance metric. Firstly, the outliers are removed, then the daily power output data for PV and Wind turbine are scaled using the minimum-maximum normalization. This normalization transforms both energies data into the same range of 0-1, where the minimum is equal to 0 and the maximum is equal to 1, while conserving its structure, hence, this allows for comparison between the two sources and identify days with high complementarity, for instance when one source is close to 1 and the other is close to zero. For complementarity assessment, the Euclidean distance is adopted. This distance is calculated for each between the normalized values of both sources, and it is between 0 and 1; higher distance indicates high complementarity level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风速评估和太阳能-风能互补性评估的新方法
本研究利用 50 米高度的再分析风速数据进行了风速分析,使用五种概率分布进行了测试和比较,使用最大似然法(MLM)估计分布参数,并使用三种拟合优度测试(即 Akaike 信息准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和安德森-达林准则(AD))选择最佳拟合值。建立了风玫瑰图、直方图、风图和风功率密度图。对于太阳能和风能之间的互补性,采用了基于能量波动的评估方法,并提出了新的互补性指标。利用再分析数据和卫星数据,使用风力涡轮机模型和光伏系统输出数据。该方法结合使用了归一化和距离度量。首先,去除异常值,然后使用最小-最大归一化法对光伏和风力涡轮机的日输出功率数据进行缩放。这种归一化方法将两种能源数据转换为相同的 0-1 范围,其中最小值等于 0,最大值等于 1,同时保留其结构,因此可以对两种能源进行比较,并找出互补性较高的日子,例如一种能源接近 1 而另一种接近 0 的日子。互补性评估采用欧氏距离。该距离在 0 和 1 之间,距离越大,互补性越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Peer-to-peer energy trading framework for an autonomous DC microgrid using game theoretic approach Hydrogen energy storage technology selection through a cutting-edge probabilistic linguistic decision framework Malaysia’s energy transition and readiness towards attaining net zero: review of the potential, constraints, and enablers Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment: converting an early retirement coal-fired power plant to a biomass power plant A methodology for preliminary benefit evaluation of Distributed Generation to drive private investments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1