Using mid-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to monitor responses of acidic soil properties to liming: case study from a dryland agricultural soil trial site in South Australia

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Precision Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s11119-024-10114-3
Ruby Hume, Petra Marschner, Sean Mason, Rhiannon K. Schilling, Luke M. Mosley
{"title":"Using mid-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to monitor responses of acidic soil properties to liming: case study from a dryland agricultural soil trial site in South Australia","authors":"Ruby Hume, Petra Marschner, Sean Mason, Rhiannon K. Schilling, Luke M. Mosley","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10114-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil acidification is an issue for agriculture that requires effective management, typically in the form of lime (calcium carbonate, CaCO<sub>3</sub>), application. Mid infrared (MIR) spectroscopy methods offer an alternative to conventional laboratory methods, that may enable cost-effective and improved measurement of soil acidity and responses to liming, including detection of small–scale heterogeneity through the profile. Properties of an acidic soil following lime application were measured using both MIR spectroscopy with Partial Least Squares Regression (MIR-PLSR) and laboratory measurements to (a) compare the ability of each method to detect lime treatment effects on acidic soil, and (b) assess effects of the different treatments on selected soil properties. Soil properties including soil pH (in H<sub>2</sub>O and CaCl<sub>2</sub>), Aluminium (Al, exchangeable and extractable), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and organic carbon (OC) were measured at a single field trial receiving lime treatments differing in rate, source and incorporation. Model performance of MIR-PLSR prediction of the soil properties ranged from R<sup>2</sup> = 0.582, RMSE = 2.023, RPIQ = 2.921 for Al (extractable) to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.881, RMSE = 0.192, RPIQ = 5.729 for OC. MIR-PLSR predictions for pH (in H<sub>2</sub>O and CaCl<sub>2</sub>) were R<sup>2</sup> = 0.739, RMSE = 0.287, RPIQ = 2.230 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.788, RMSE = 0.311, RPIQ = 1.897 respectively, and could detect a similar treatment effect compared to laboratory measurements. Treatment effects were not detected for MIR-PLSR-predicted values of CEC and both exchangeable and extractable Al. Findings support MIR-PLSR as a method of measuring soil pH to monitor effects of liming treatments on acidic soil to help inform precision agricultural management strategies, but suggests that some nuance and important information about treatment effects of lime on CEC and Al may be lost. Improvements to prediction model performance should be made to realise the full potential of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10114-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil acidification is an issue for agriculture that requires effective management, typically in the form of lime (calcium carbonate, CaCO3), application. Mid infrared (MIR) spectroscopy methods offer an alternative to conventional laboratory methods, that may enable cost-effective and improved measurement of soil acidity and responses to liming, including detection of small–scale heterogeneity through the profile. Properties of an acidic soil following lime application were measured using both MIR spectroscopy with Partial Least Squares Regression (MIR-PLSR) and laboratory measurements to (a) compare the ability of each method to detect lime treatment effects on acidic soil, and (b) assess effects of the different treatments on selected soil properties. Soil properties including soil pH (in H2O and CaCl2), Aluminium (Al, exchangeable and extractable), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and organic carbon (OC) were measured at a single field trial receiving lime treatments differing in rate, source and incorporation. Model performance of MIR-PLSR prediction of the soil properties ranged from R2 = 0.582, RMSE = 2.023, RPIQ = 2.921 for Al (extractable) to R2 = 0.881, RMSE = 0.192, RPIQ = 5.729 for OC. MIR-PLSR predictions for pH (in H2O and CaCl2) were R2 = 0.739, RMSE = 0.287, RPIQ = 2.230 and R2 = 0.788, RMSE = 0.311, RPIQ = 1.897 respectively, and could detect a similar treatment effect compared to laboratory measurements. Treatment effects were not detected for MIR-PLSR-predicted values of CEC and both exchangeable and extractable Al. Findings support MIR-PLSR as a method of measuring soil pH to monitor effects of liming treatments on acidic soil to help inform precision agricultural management strategies, but suggests that some nuance and important information about treatment effects of lime on CEC and Al may be lost. Improvements to prediction model performance should be made to realise the full potential of this approach.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用中红外光谱监测酸性土壤性质对石灰化的反应:南澳大利亚一个旱地农业土壤试验场的案例研究
土壤酸化是农业面临的一个问题,需要进行有效的管理,通常采用施用石灰(碳酸钙,CaCO3)的形式。中红外(MIR)光谱法提供了一种替代传统实验室方法的方法,可以经济有效地测量土壤酸度和对石灰的反应,包括通过剖面检测小范围的异质性。使用偏最小二乘法回归(MIR-PLSR)的近红外光谱法和实验室测量法测量了施用石灰后酸性土壤的性质,以(a)比较每种方法检测石灰处理对酸性土壤影响的能力,(b)评估不同处理对选定土壤性质的影响。土壤特性包括土壤 pH 值(以 H2O 和 CaCl2 计)、铝(Al,可交换和可萃取)、阳离子交换容量(CEC)和有机碳(OC)。土壤性质的 MIR-PLSR 预测模型性能从 Al(可提取)的 R2 = 0.582、RMSE = 2.023、RPIQ = 2.921 到 OC 的 R2 = 0.881、RMSE = 0.192、RPIQ = 5.729 不等。对 pH 值(以 H2O 和 CaCl2 计)的 MIR-PLSR 预测值分别为 R2 = 0.739、RMSE = 0.287、RPIQ = 2.230 和 R2 = 0.788、RMSE = 0.311、RPIQ = 1.897,与实验室测量值相比,可以检测到类似的处理效果。MIR-PLSR 预测的 CEC 值以及可交换铝和可萃取铝的处理效果均未检测到。研究结果支持将 MIR-PLSR 作为一种测量土壤 pH 值的方法,以监测酸性土壤中石灰处理的效果,从而为精准农业管理策略提供信息,但研究结果表明,石灰对 CEC 和 Al 的处理效果的一些细微差别和重要信息可能会丢失。应改进预测模型的性能,以充分发挥这种方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy and robustness of a plant-level cabbage yield prediction system generated by assimilating UAV-based remote sensing data into a crop simulation model Correction to: On-farm experimentation of precision agriculture for differential seed and fertilizer management in semi-arid rainfed zones A low cost sensor to improve surface irrigation management On-farm experimentation of precision agriculture for differential seed and fertilizer management in semi-arid rainfed zones Relevance of NDVI, soil apparent electrical conductivity and topography for variable rate irrigation zoning in an olive grove
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1