A mixed methods comparison of adolescents' and researchers' observations of neighborhood characteristics in Latinx neighborhoods

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American journal of community psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12742
Michelle C. Pasco, Rebecca M. B. White
{"title":"A mixed methods comparison of adolescents' and researchers' observations of neighborhood characteristics in Latinx neighborhoods","authors":"Michelle C. Pasco,&nbsp;Rebecca M. B. White","doi":"10.1002/ajcp.12742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We used a convergent mixed methods research design to compare and contrast researchers' neighborhood environmental assessments collected using systematic social observations with adolescents' neighborhood environmental assessments collected by semi-structured interviews with US Mexican adolescents. Using qualitative methods, we found that adolescents sometimes observed the same neighborhood environmental features as researchers. They also sometimes observed different environmental features altogether; in both cases they sometimes layered on additional meaning making. Using mixed methods, we found that there was a high degree of overlap between researchers and adolescents in terms of agreement on the presence of neighborhood environmental features, including physical disorder, physical decay, street safety, and sociocultural symbols. Adolescents expanded upon these neighborhood environmental features with references to positive and negative affect and neighborhood environmental resources. This work highlights the shared and unique aspects of researcher versus adolescent observations and how both data sources are critical to understanding Latinx neighborhood environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7576,"journal":{"name":"American journal of community psychology","volume":"73 3-4","pages":"526-540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajcp.12742","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajcp.12742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used a convergent mixed methods research design to compare and contrast researchers' neighborhood environmental assessments collected using systematic social observations with adolescents' neighborhood environmental assessments collected by semi-structured interviews with US Mexican adolescents. Using qualitative methods, we found that adolescents sometimes observed the same neighborhood environmental features as researchers. They also sometimes observed different environmental features altogether; in both cases they sometimes layered on additional meaning making. Using mixed methods, we found that there was a high degree of overlap between researchers and adolescents in terms of agreement on the presence of neighborhood environmental features, including physical disorder, physical decay, street safety, and sociocultural symbols. Adolescents expanded upon these neighborhood environmental features with references to positive and negative affect and neighborhood environmental resources. This work highlights the shared and unique aspects of researcher versus adolescent observations and how both data sources are critical to understanding Latinx neighborhood environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以混合方法比较青少年和研究人员对拉丁裔社区特征的观察。
我们采用聚合混合方法研究设计,将研究人员通过系统社会观察收集到的社区环境评估与青少年通过对美国墨西哥青少年进行半结构化访谈收集到的社区环境评估进行比较和对比。通过定性方法,我们发现青少年有时会观察到与研究人员相同的社区环境特征。他们有时也会观察到完全不同的环境特征;在这两种情况下,他们有时会进行额外的意义建构。在使用混合方法时,我们发现研究人员和青少年在对邻里环境特征(包括自然失调、自然衰败、街道安全和社会文化符号)的存在达成一致意见方面有很大程度的重叠。青少年通过提及积极和消极情绪以及邻里环境资源,对这些邻里环境特征进行了扩展。这项研究强调了研究人员与青少年观察的共同点和独特性,以及这两种数据来源对于了解拉丁裔社区环境的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; theoretical papers; empirical reviews; reports of innovative community programs or policies; and first person accounts of stakeholders involved in research, programs, or policy. The journal encourages submissions of innovative multi-level research and interventions, and encourages international submissions. The journal also encourages the submission of manuscripts concerned with underrepresented populations and issues of human diversity. The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes research, theory, and descriptions of innovative interventions on a wide range of topics, including, but not limited to: individual, family, peer, and community mental health, physical health, and substance use; risk and protective factors for health and well being; educational, legal, and work environment processes, policies, and opportunities; social ecological approaches, including the interplay of individual family, peer, institutional, neighborhood, and community processes; social welfare, social justice, and human rights; social problems and social change; program, system, and policy evaluations; and, understanding people within their social, cultural, economic, geographic, and historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
"Someday, I'll be an ancestor:" Understanding indigenous intergenerational connectedness through qualitative research to inform measure development. "We're all about being together as a family": Community sports program fosters newcomer immigrant girls' academic achievement, resilience, and coping. This is fine: Using memes to examine resilience, coping, and community for sexual minority men and nonbinary individuals during COVID-19. The experience of migrant mothers of African origin in Spain: A human rights-based approach to mental health. Centering Latinx immigrant knowledge for wellbeing, liberation, and justice in community-university research partnerships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1