A randomized controlled trial of a digital cognitive-behavioral therapy program (COMPASS) for managing depression and anxiety related to living with a long-term physical health condition.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1017/S0033291723003756
Federica Picariello, Katrin Hulme, Natasha Seaton, Joanna L Hudson, Sam Norton, Abigail Wroe, Rona Moss-Morris
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of a digital cognitive-behavioral therapy program (COMPASS) for managing depression and anxiety related to living with a long-term physical health condition.","authors":"Federica Picariello, Katrin Hulme, Natasha Seaton, Joanna L Hudson, Sam Norton, Abigail Wroe, Rona Moss-Morris","doi":"10.1017/S0033291723003756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of COMPASS, a therapist-supported digital therapeutic for reducing psychological distress (anxiety/depression) in people living with long-term physical health conditions (LTCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-armed randomized-controlled trial recruiting from LTC charities. Participants with anxiety and/or depression symptoms related to their LTC(s) were randomized (concealed allocation via independent administrator) to COMPASS (access to 11 tailored modules plus five thirty-minute therapist support sessions) or standard charity support (SCS). Assessments were completed online pre-randomization, at 6- and 12-weeks post-randomization. Primary outcome was Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale; PHQ-ADS measured at 12-weeks. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles with adjusted mean differences estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Data-analyst was blinded to group allocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 participants were randomized to COMPASS (<i>N</i> = 94) or SCS (<i>N</i> = 100). At 12-weeks, mean level of psychological distress was 6.82 (95% confidence interval; CI 4.55-9.10) points lower (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the COMPASS arm compared with SCS (standardized mean difference of 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-0.95)). The COMPASS arm also showed moderate significant treatment effects on secondary outcomes including depression, anxiety and illness-related distress and small significant effects on functioning and quality-of-life. Rates of adverse events were comparable across the arms. Deterioration in distress at 12-weeks was observed in 2.2% of the SCS arm, and no participants in the COMPASS arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SCS, COMPASS digital therapeutic with minimal therapist input reduces psychological distress at post-treatment (12-weeks). COMPASS offers a potentially scalable implementation model for health services but its translation to these contexts needs further evaluating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04535778.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723003756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of COMPASS, a therapist-supported digital therapeutic for reducing psychological distress (anxiety/depression) in people living with long-term physical health conditions (LTCs).

Methods: A two-armed randomized-controlled trial recruiting from LTC charities. Participants with anxiety and/or depression symptoms related to their LTC(s) were randomized (concealed allocation via independent administrator) to COMPASS (access to 11 tailored modules plus five thirty-minute therapist support sessions) or standard charity support (SCS). Assessments were completed online pre-randomization, at 6- and 12-weeks post-randomization. Primary outcome was Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale; PHQ-ADS measured at 12-weeks. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles with adjusted mean differences estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Data-analyst was blinded to group allocation.

Results: 194 participants were randomized to COMPASS (N = 94) or SCS (N = 100). At 12-weeks, mean level of psychological distress was 6.82 (95% confidence interval; CI 4.55-9.10) points lower (p < 0.001) in the COMPASS arm compared with SCS (standardized mean difference of 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-0.95)). The COMPASS arm also showed moderate significant treatment effects on secondary outcomes including depression, anxiety and illness-related distress and small significant effects on functioning and quality-of-life. Rates of adverse events were comparable across the arms. Deterioration in distress at 12-weeks was observed in 2.2% of the SCS arm, and no participants in the COMPASS arm.

Conclusion: Compared with SCS, COMPASS digital therapeutic with minimal therapist input reduces psychological distress at post-treatment (12-weeks). COMPASS offers a potentially scalable implementation model for health services but its translation to these contexts needs further evaluating.

Trial registration: NCT04535778.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字认知行为疗法项目(COMPASS)的随机对照试验,用于控制与长期身体健康状况相关的抑郁和焦虑。
背景:评估 COMPASS 的临床疗效:目的:评估 COMPASS 的临床疗效。COMPASS 是一种由治疗师提供支持的数字疗法,用于减轻长期身体健康状况不佳(LTCs)患者的心理压力(焦虑/抑郁):方法:一项双臂随机对照试验,从长期护理中心慈善机构招募人员。有焦虑和/或抑郁症状的长寿者被随机分配到 COMPASS(11 个定制模块和 5 次 30 分钟的治疗师支持课程)或标准慈善支持(SCS)(通过独立管理员进行隐蔽分配)。评估在随机前、随机后 6 周和 12 周在线完成。主要结果是患者健康问卷焦虑和抑郁量表;PHQ-ADS 在 12 周时进行测量。分析采用意向治疗原则,使用线性混合效应模型估算调整后的平均差异。数据分析师对组别分配保持盲法:194名参与者被随机分配到COMPASS(94人)或SCS(100人)组。12周时,COMPASS组的平均心理压力水平比SCS组低6.82分(95%置信区间;CI为4.55-9.10)(p < 0.001)(标准化平均差异为0.71(95% CI为0.48-0.95))。COMPASS 治疗组对抑郁、焦虑和疾病相关痛苦等次要结果也有中等程度的显著治疗效果,对功能和生活质量也有小幅显著效果。各治疗组的不良反应发生率相当。在12周时,SCS治疗组有2.2%的患者出现了窘迫感恶化,而COMPASS治疗组没有患者出现窘迫感恶化:结论:与 SCS 相比,COMPASS 数字疗法只需极少的治疗师投入,就能减少治疗后(12 周)的心理压力。COMPASS为医疗服务提供了一种潜在的可扩展实施模式,但其在这些环境中的应用还需要进一步评估:试验注册:NCT04535778。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Beyond IQ: executive function deficits and their relation to functional, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes in 3q29 deletion syndrome. Complex PTSD symptoms predict positive symptoms of psychosis in the flow of daily life. Digital assessment of nonverbal behaviors forecasts first onset of depression. Genetic and molecular correlates of cortical thickness alterations in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a transcription-neuroimaging association analysis. Influence of perceived harm due to substance use on the relationships between positive psychotic experiences and suicidal experiences in people with non-affective psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1