Prelacrimal window approach to the maxillary sinus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.296
A Machado, J Pereira, F Alvarez, H R Briner, D Simmen
{"title":"Prelacrimal window approach to the maxillary sinus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.","authors":"A Machado, J Pereira, F Alvarez, H R Briner, D Simmen","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prelacrimal window approach (PLWA) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional approaches to access the maxillary sinus.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines and identified 368 articles for initial review of which 14 (610 participants) met the criteria for meta-analysis. Four databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched to identify relevant articles. Two independent reviewers conducted the eligibility assessment for the included studies. Methodology quality and risk of bias were evaluated by New Castle Ottawa scale. The outcomes assessed were recurrence of the pathology, postoperative morbidity including epiphora, dry nose, facial, gingival numbness, epistaxis or local infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present data suggest a significant reduction in the recurrence rate of maxillary sinus pathology following PLWA when compared to conventional surgery (endoscopic medial maxillectomy, endoscopic sinus surgery and the Caldwell-Luc operation). The rates of epiphora, facial or gingival numbness, epistaxis or infection requiring intervention, were not significantly different between the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maxillary sinus pathology can be effectively treated using the PLWA technique, as it has been shown to result in a lower recurrence rate compared to conventional surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"271-286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prelacrimal window approach (PLWA) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional approaches to access the maxillary sinus.

Methodology: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines and identified 368 articles for initial review of which 14 (610 participants) met the criteria for meta-analysis. Four databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched to identify relevant articles. Two independent reviewers conducted the eligibility assessment for the included studies. Methodology quality and risk of bias were evaluated by New Castle Ottawa scale. The outcomes assessed were recurrence of the pathology, postoperative morbidity including epiphora, dry nose, facial, gingival numbness, epistaxis or local infection.

Results: The present data suggest a significant reduction in the recurrence rate of maxillary sinus pathology following PLWA when compared to conventional surgery (endoscopic medial maxillectomy, endoscopic sinus surgery and the Caldwell-Luc operation). The rates of epiphora, facial or gingival numbness, epistaxis or infection requiring intervention, were not significantly different between the procedures.

Conclusions: Maxillary sinus pathology can be effectively treated using the PLWA technique, as it has been shown to result in a lower recurrence rate compared to conventional surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上颌窦前泪窗方法:文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:泪道前窗入路(PLWA)是一种微创手术技术,已被提出作为传统入路上颌窦的替代方法:根据PRISMA指南进行了系统性综述和荟萃分析,确定了368篇初步综述文章,其中14篇(610名参与者)符合荟萃分析标准。研究人员检索了 PubMed、Google Scholar、Web of Science 和 Scopus 等四个数据库,以确定相关文章。两名独立审查员对纳入的研究进行了资格评估。研究方法的质量和偏倚风险采用新卡塞尔-渥太华量表进行评估。评估的结果包括病理复发率、术后发病率(包括鼻衄、鼻干、面部、牙龈麻木、鼻衄或局部感染):目前的数据表明,与传统手术(内窥镜上颌骨内侧切除术、内窥镜鼻窦手术和 Caldwell-Luc 手术)相比,PLWA 术后上颌窦病变的复发率明显降低。不同手术的上睑下垂、面部或牙龈麻木、鼻衄或感染的发生率没有显著差异:结论:使用 PLWA 技术可以有效治疗上颌窦病变,因为与传统手术相比,该技术的复发率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1