A negative emotional state impairs individuals' ability to filter distractors from working memory: an ERP study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01166-z
Chaoxiong Ye, Ruyi Liu, Lijing Guo, Guoying Zhao, Qiang Liu
{"title":"A negative emotional state impairs individuals' ability to filter distractors from working memory: an ERP study.","authors":"Chaoxiong Ye, Ruyi Liu, Lijing Guo, Guoying Zhao, Qiang Liu","doi":"10.3758/s13415-024-01166-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capacity-limited visual working memory (VWM) requires that individuals have sufficient memory space and the ability to filter distractors. Negative emotional states are known to impact VWM storage, yet their influence on distractor filtering within VWM remains underexplored. We conducted direct neural measurement of participants (n = 56) who conducted a lateralized change detection task with distractors, while manipulating the emotional state by presenting neutral or negative images before each trial. We found a detrimental effect of distractors on memory accuracy under both neutral and negative emotional states. Using the event-related potential (ERP) component, contralateral delay activity (CDA; sensitive to VWM load), to observe the VWM load in each condition, we found that in the neutral state, the participants showed significantly higher late CDA amplitudes when remembering 4 targets compared with 2 targets and 2 targets with 2 distractors but no significant difference when remembering 2 targets compared with 2 targets with 2 distractors. In the negative state, no significant CDA amplitude differences were evident when remembering 4 targets and 2 targets, but CDA was significantly higher when remembering 2 targets with 2 distractors compared with 2 targets. These results suggest that the maximum number of items participants could store in VWM was lower under negative emotional states than under neutral emotional states. Importantly, the participants could filter out distractors when in a neutral emotional state but not in a negative emotional state, indicating that negative emotional states impair their ability to filter out distractors in VWM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"491-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01166-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capacity-limited visual working memory (VWM) requires that individuals have sufficient memory space and the ability to filter distractors. Negative emotional states are known to impact VWM storage, yet their influence on distractor filtering within VWM remains underexplored. We conducted direct neural measurement of participants (n = 56) who conducted a lateralized change detection task with distractors, while manipulating the emotional state by presenting neutral or negative images before each trial. We found a detrimental effect of distractors on memory accuracy under both neutral and negative emotional states. Using the event-related potential (ERP) component, contralateral delay activity (CDA; sensitive to VWM load), to observe the VWM load in each condition, we found that in the neutral state, the participants showed significantly higher late CDA amplitudes when remembering 4 targets compared with 2 targets and 2 targets with 2 distractors but no significant difference when remembering 2 targets compared with 2 targets with 2 distractors. In the negative state, no significant CDA amplitude differences were evident when remembering 4 targets and 2 targets, but CDA was significantly higher when remembering 2 targets with 2 distractors compared with 2 targets. These results suggest that the maximum number of items participants could store in VWM was lower under negative emotional states than under neutral emotional states. Importantly, the participants could filter out distractors when in a neutral emotional state but not in a negative emotional state, indicating that negative emotional states impair their ability to filter out distractors in VWM.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负面情绪状态会削弱个体从工作记忆中过滤干扰项的能力:一项ERP研究。
容量有限的视觉工作记忆(VWM)要求个体有足够的记忆空间和过滤干扰物的能力。众所周知,消极情绪状态会影响视觉工作记忆的存储,但它们对视觉工作记忆中分心物过滤的影响仍未得到充分探索。我们对参加者(n = 56)进行了直接神经测量,他们进行了带有干扰物的侧向变化检测任务,同时通过在每次试验前呈现中性或负面图像来操纵情绪状态。我们发现,在中性和负面情绪状态下,干扰物对记忆准确性都有不利影响。通过使用事件相关电位(ERP)成分--对侧延迟活动(CDA;对VWM负荷敏感)来观察每个条件下的VWM负荷,我们发现在中性状态下,被试在记忆4个目标时的CDA晚期振幅明显高于记忆2个目标和2个目标加2个分心物时的振幅,但在记忆2个目标时的CDA晚期振幅与记忆2个目标加2个分心物时的振幅没有显著差异。在负状态下,记忆 4 个目标和 2 个目标时 CDA 振幅无明显差异,但记忆 2 个目标和 2 个分散注意力的目标时 CDA 与记忆 2 个目标时 CDA 相比明显较高。这些结果表明,与中性情绪状态相比,负性情绪状态下受试者在 VWM 中可储存的最大项目数更少。重要的是,受试者在中性情绪状态下可以过滤掉分心物,而在消极情绪状态下则不行,这表明消极情绪状态会损害他们在VWM中过滤掉分心物的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
期刊最新文献
Anhedonia relates to reduced striatal reward anticipation in depression but not in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: A transdiagnostic study. Correction: Changes in the level of unitization moderate the impact of unitization on associative memory and its underlying processing. Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions. Low emotional contagious behavior induces PTSD susceptibility in observers and is related to the regulation of oxytocin receptor in mice. The influence of social status and promise levels in trust games: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1