3D EVALUATION OF MICROGAPS AT THE IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTION BEFORE AND AFTER THERMODYNAMIC CYCLING.

Tuğçe Çetin, Y Umut Aslan
{"title":"3D EVALUATION OF MICROGAPS AT THE IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTION BEFORE AND AFTER THERMODYNAMIC CYCLING.","authors":"Tuğçe Çetin, Y Umut Aslan","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the microgap changes between hybrid-abutment crowns made of two materials and three internal taper connec9on implants with different connection designs before and after thermodynamic loading.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 implants-10 each of Straumann Bone Level Implant-RC (STR); GC AADVA Implant (AAD); and Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV (AST)-were included in this laboratory study. Each implant had an internal taper connection, but their designs were slightly different. Five hybrid-abutment crowns were fabricated using a lithium disilicate ceramic (LD), and five were fabricated using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with CAD/CAM technologies for each implant system, providing six sample groups STR-LD, AAD-LD, AST-LD, STR-PMMA, AAD-PMMA, and ASTPMMA. The microgap volume was measured using micro-CT images obtained before and after thermodynamic loading equivalent to 4 months of clinical use. Student t test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey test were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest microgap volume increase was recorded (3.405% ± 1.567%) in the AST-LD group, and the lowest increase (0.45% ± 0.373%) was in the STR-PMMA group. A statistically significant difference in microgap increase was not detected among PMMA and LD groups: for STR-LD/STR-PMMA (t test: P = .273); for AAD-LD/AAD-PMMA (t test: P = .374); and for AST-LD/AST-PMMA (t test: P = .268). However, the difference in the microgap increase between the different implant systems was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The microgap between hybrid-abutment crowns and implants increased after short-term thermodynamic cycling. Hybrid-abutment crowns with different elastic modulus showed similar microgap increase. The geometric shape of the connection influenced the microgap increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the microgap changes between hybrid-abutment crowns made of two materials and three internal taper connec9on implants with different connection designs before and after thermodynamic loading.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 implants-10 each of Straumann Bone Level Implant-RC (STR); GC AADVA Implant (AAD); and Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV (AST)-were included in this laboratory study. Each implant had an internal taper connection, but their designs were slightly different. Five hybrid-abutment crowns were fabricated using a lithium disilicate ceramic (LD), and five were fabricated using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with CAD/CAM technologies for each implant system, providing six sample groups STR-LD, AAD-LD, AST-LD, STR-PMMA, AAD-PMMA, and ASTPMMA. The microgap volume was measured using micro-CT images obtained before and after thermodynamic loading equivalent to 4 months of clinical use. Student t test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey test were used for comparisons.

Results: The greatest microgap volume increase was recorded (3.405% ± 1.567%) in the AST-LD group, and the lowest increase (0.45% ± 0.373%) was in the STR-PMMA group. A statistically significant difference in microgap increase was not detected among PMMA and LD groups: for STR-LD/STR-PMMA (t test: P = .273); for AAD-LD/AAD-PMMA (t test: P = .374); and for AST-LD/AST-PMMA (t test: P = .268). However, the difference in the microgap increase between the different implant systems was statistically significant.

Conclusions: The microgap between hybrid-abutment crowns and implants increased after short-term thermodynamic cycling. Hybrid-abutment crowns with different elastic modulus showed similar microgap increase. The geometric shape of the connection influenced the microgap increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热力学循环前后种植体与基台连接处微间隙的三维评估
目的:分析两种材料制成的混合基台冠与三种不同连接设计的内锥连接种植体在热力学加载前后的微间隙变化:本实验室研究共包括 30 个种植体,Straumann Bone Level Implant-RC [STR]、GC AADVA Implant [AAD]和 Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV [AST]各 10 个。每种种植体都有内锥连接,但设计略有不同。每种种植体系统都采用 CAD/CAM 技术,使用二硅酸锂陶瓷[LD]制作了五个混合基台冠,使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯[PMMA]制作了五个混合基台冠,共提供了六组样本:STR-LD、AAD-LD、AST-LD、STR-PMMA、AAD-PMMA 和 AST-PMMA。在相当于临床使用 4 个月的热力学加载前后,使用获得的显微 CT 图像测量微间隙体积。比较采用学生 t 检验、单向方差分析和 Tukey 检验:结果:AST-LD 组的微间隙体积增幅最大(%3.405ű1.567),STR-PMMA 组的增幅最小(%0.45ű0.373)。PMMA 组和 LD 组在微间隙增加方面没有发现明显的统计学差异:(t 检验:P=0,273)。 这篇经过同行评审并已被接受的稿件将在印刷出版前进行最终编辑和制作。STR-LD/STR-PMMA、(t 检验:p=0,374)AAD-LD/AAD-PMMA 和(t 检验:p=0,268)AST-LD/AST-PMMA。然而,不同种植体系统之间的微间隙增加差异具有统计学意义:结论:混合基台冠和种植体之间的微间隙在热力学循环后短期内有所增加。不同弹性模量的混合基台冠表现出相似的微间隙增加。连接的几何形状影响了微间隙的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Hydrolytic Behavior of Resin Matrix Ceramics. A Pilot Study to Predict Lifetime of Resin-Based Materials for Denture: Presentation of an In Vitro Thermally-Accelerated Ageing Method. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing. Reference CAD-CAM Samples for Dental Shade Communication for Successful Aesthetic Outcome. An Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concept in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1