Efficacy and Rapidity of Potassium Hydroxide Mount and Modified Chicago Sky Blue 6B Stain with Potassium Hydroxide in Fungal Keratitis Detection.

Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.3341/kjo.2023.0106
Prateep Warnnissorn, Jeerawat Sawatdiwithayayong, Phrutthinun Surit
{"title":"Efficacy and Rapidity of Potassium Hydroxide Mount and Modified Chicago Sky Blue 6B Stain with Potassium Hydroxide in Fungal Keratitis Detection.","authors":"Prateep Warnnissorn, Jeerawat Sawatdiwithayayong, Phrutthinun Surit","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2023.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and rapidity of direct microscopic detection of fungal elements from corneal ulcers between 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) and 1% Chicago Sky Blue 6B (CSB) in 10% KOH (CSB-KOH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients with clinically suspected fungal keratitis were recruited. Participants with impending corneal perforation were excluded. Two slides were smeared with corneal ulcer scrapings from the ulcer's edge and base for comparison of fungal staining solutions. One slide was infused with KOH, and the other slide was filled with CSB-KOH. Additional scraping was collected for inoculation on Sabouraud dextrose agar for fungal culture. The sensitivity, specificity and rapidity of both stainings were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of fungal culture, KOH, and CSB-KOH were 43.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.75%-70.12%), 62.50% (95% CI, 35.43%-84.80%), and 87.50% (95% CI, 61.65%-98.45%), respectively. The specificity were 100% (95% CI, 69.15%-100%) of both stainings and fungal culture which analyzed from 16 fungal keratitis cases by laboratory and clinical diagnosis. Mean CSB-KOH examination time was quicker than KOH with the mean time difference of 5.6 minutes (95% CI, 3.22-7.98 minutes) and p-value &lt; 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CSB-KOH was more effective and faster than KOH in detecting fungal elements from corneal ulcers. Therefore, CSB-KOH may be beneficial in diagnosing fungal keratitis and preventing blindness. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of CSB stain in fungal keratitis detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2023.0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and rapidity of direct microscopic detection of fungal elements from corneal ulcers between 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) and 1% Chicago Sky Blue 6B (CSB) in 10% KOH (CSB-KOH).

Methods: Thirty patients with clinically suspected fungal keratitis were recruited. Participants with impending corneal perforation were excluded. Two slides were smeared with corneal ulcer scrapings from the ulcer's edge and base for comparison of fungal staining solutions. One slide was infused with KOH, and the other slide was filled with CSB-KOH. Additional scraping was collected for inoculation on Sabouraud dextrose agar for fungal culture. The sensitivity, specificity and rapidity of both stainings were analyzed.

Results: The sensitivity of fungal culture, KOH, and CSB-KOH were 43.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.75%-70.12%), 62.50% (95% CI, 35.43%-84.80%), and 87.50% (95% CI, 61.65%-98.45%), respectively. The specificity were 100% (95% CI, 69.15%-100%) of both stainings and fungal culture which analyzed from 16 fungal keratitis cases by laboratory and clinical diagnosis. Mean CSB-KOH examination time was quicker than KOH with the mean time difference of 5.6 minutes (95% CI, 3.22-7.98 minutes) and p-value < 0.001.

Conclusions: CSB-KOH was more effective and faster than KOH in detecting fungal elements from corneal ulcers. Therefore, CSB-KOH may be beneficial in diagnosing fungal keratitis and preventing blindness. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of CSB stain in fungal keratitis detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢氧化钾装片和氢氧化钾改良芝加哥天蓝 6 B 染色法在真菌性角膜炎检测中的有效性和快速性。
目的:比较 10%氢氧化钾(KOH)和 10% KOH 中的 1%芝加哥天蓝 6 B(CSB-KOH)直接显微镜检测角膜溃疡中真菌成分的效果和快速性:招募了 30 名临床疑似真菌性角膜炎患者。排除了即将发生角膜穿孔的患者。在两张载玻片上涂抹溃疡边缘和基底部的角膜溃疡刮片,以比较真菌染色溶液。一张玻片注入 KOH,另一张玻片注入 CSB-KOH。另外收集的刮片接种到沙保路葡萄糖琼脂上进行真菌培养。对两种染色法的敏感性、特异性和快速性进行了分析:结果:真菌培养、KOH 和 CSB-KOH 的灵敏度分别为 43.75%(95%CI:19.75-70.12)、62.50%(95%CI:35.43-84.80)和 87.50%(95%CI:61.65-98.45)。通过实验室和临床诊断对 16 例真菌性角膜炎病例进行分析,染色和真菌培养的特异性均为 100%(95%CI:69.15-100)。CSB-KOH检查的平均时间比KOH快,平均时间差为05:36分钟(95%CI:03:13-07:59),P值小于0.001:在检测角膜溃疡中的真菌成分方面,CSB-KOH比KOH更有效、更快速。因此,CSB-KOH 有助于诊断真菌性角膜炎和预防失明。此外,据我们所知,这是首次使用芝加哥天蓝 6 B 染色法检测真菌性角膜炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultra-Wide-Field Fluorescein Angiographic Features Influencing Visual Prognosis in Coats' Disease. Clinical Features and Visual Outcome of Infectious Keratitis Associated with Orthokeratology Lens in Korean Pediatric Patients. Long-term Outcomes of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Using a Modified Normogram for Targeting Small Overcorrection in Intermittent Exotropia. Two-year outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with 'observe before treat-and-extend' method. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with periorbital ecchymosis and massive subconjunctival hemorrhage as a presenting sign: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1