Revision Surgery for Recurrent Morton Neuroma with Use of a Collagen Conduit.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2023-11-29 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00065
Mila Scheinberg, Meghan Underwood, Matthew Sankey, Thomas Sanchez, Ashish Shah
{"title":"Revision Surgery for Recurrent Morton Neuroma with Use of a Collagen Conduit.","authors":"Mila Scheinberg, Meghan Underwood, Matthew Sankey, Thomas Sanchez, Ashish Shah","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Painful neuromas of the foot and ankle frequently pose a treatment dilemma because of persistent pain or recurrence after resection. Primary surgical treatment of painful neuromas includes simple excision with retraction of the residual nerve ending to a less vulnerable location<sup>1-4</sup>. The use of a collagen conduit for recurrent neuromas is advantageous, particularly in areas with minimal soft-tissue coverage options, and is a technique that has shown 85% patient satisfaction regarding surgical outcomes<sup>7</sup>. Additionally, the use of a collagen conduit limits the need for deep soft-tissue dissection and reduces the morbidity typically associated with nerve burial.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Specific steps include appropriate physical examination, preoperative planning, and supine patient positioning. The patient is placed supine with a lower-extremity bolster under the ipsilateral extremity in order to allow improved visualization of the plantar surface of the foot. A nonsterile tourniquet is placed on the thigh. The incision site is marked out, and a longitudinal plantar incision is made until proximal healthy nerve is identified-typically approximately 1 to 2 cm, but the incision can be extended up to 6 cm. The incision is made between the metatarsals, with blunt dissection carried down to the neuroma. The neuroma is sharply excised distally through healthy nerve, and a whip stitch is placed to facilitate the collagen conduit placement. The collagen conduit is passed dorsally into the intermetatarsal space and secured to the dorsal fascia of the foot. The wound is closed with 3-0 nylon horizontal mattress sutures. Postoperatively, a soft dressing is applied to the operative extremity, and patients are advised to be non-weight-bearing for two weeks. At two weeks, patients begin partial weight-bearing with use of a boot, and physical therapy is initiated. No antibiotics are necessary, and 300 mg of gabapentin is prescribed and tapered off by the six-week follow-up visit. Follow-ups are conducted at 2, 6, 12, 24, and fifty-two weeks. It is necessary to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection, surgical complications, and neuroma recurrence during follow-up appointments.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Simple excision of the neuroma with proximal burial into muscle or bone is a common surgical technique. However, inadequate resection of the nerve or poor surgical technique can lead to recurrent neuromas. For neuromas not responding to simple excision, other techniques have been utilized, including cauterization, chemical agents, nerve capping, and muscle or bone burial<sup>5,6</sup>. The results of these techniques have varied, and none has gained clinical superiority over the other<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>A study analyzing the use of collagen conduits for painful neuromas of the foot and ankle has shown this technique to be a safe and successful alternative to the previously discussed methods of resection<sup>7</sup>. That study by Gould et al. found that 85% of patients had a substantial reduction in pain, with mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores reducing from 8 to 10 preoperatively to 0 to 4 postoperatively<sup>7</sup>. Moreover, alternative biological conduits, such as the greater saphenous vein, have proven to be costly in time and resources, as this structure is often utilized in cardiovascular bypass surgery and its harvest conveys a risk of iatrogenic nerve injury to the patient<sup>7</sup>.Numerous studies focusing on excision of recurrent Morton neuromas via a plantar approach have found variable success rates. Of the patients surveyed in those studies, 75% reported substantial pain improvement. However, <50% of these queried patients reported complete pain relief<sup>8,9</sup>. Studies analyzing the dorsal approach for revision Morton neuroma excision found similar success rates. Approximately 78% of patients reported good or excellent postoperative outcomes, and significant improvements were observed in patient postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores for pain interference, intensity, and global physical health<sup>10,11</sup>. One study comparing outcomes following plantar versus dorsal approaches for recurrent Morton neuroma found no significant difference in postoperative patient outcomes. That study suggested that surgeons utilize the approach with which they are most comfortable<sup>12</sup>. Gould et al. reported an 85% success rate with collagen conduit, which was similar to if not slightly improved compared with the other prior studies. The utilization of a collagen conduit technique thus offers comparable patient outcomes for patients with difficult neuromas<sup>7</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Recurrent neuroma resection with the use of a collagen conduit has proven to provide satisfactory patient outcomes regarding pain and neuritis symptoms<sup>7</sup>. The goal of any neuroma resection is to greatly diminish or entirely eliminate nerve pain. Based on the available evidence, there has been no proven clinical superiority of any particular technique over the others<sup>6</sup>. However, in the present example case, the location of the patient's neuroma in this video makes it 85% likely that the patient will report satisfactory outcomes and 50% likely that the patient will be entirely symptom-free<sup>7</sup>. At two weeks postoperatively, the patient reported well controlled pain, absence of burning or tingling sensation, full range of movement in the foot, and intact sensation throughout all major nerve distributions, including the saphenous; superficial peroneal nerve; deep peroneal nerve; and sural, medial, and lateral plantar nerves. However, sensation is absent distal to the site of a neuroma resection.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Careful preoperative planting is of utmost importance.Ruling out other potential pathologies is necessary to ensure proper outcomes.Meticulous dissection should be carried out, with delicate handling of the proximal nerve ending.Excision of the nerve should be done sharply through the healthy portion of the nerve.Appropriate sizing of the nerve conduit (with a commercially available industry sizer) should be performed.The nerve conduit should be passed dorsally and secured to the dorsal fascia without any tension.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>MRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundVAS = visual analog scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10863939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Painful neuromas of the foot and ankle frequently pose a treatment dilemma because of persistent pain or recurrence after resection. Primary surgical treatment of painful neuromas includes simple excision with retraction of the residual nerve ending to a less vulnerable location1-4. The use of a collagen conduit for recurrent neuromas is advantageous, particularly in areas with minimal soft-tissue coverage options, and is a technique that has shown 85% patient satisfaction regarding surgical outcomes7. Additionally, the use of a collagen conduit limits the need for deep soft-tissue dissection and reduces the morbidity typically associated with nerve burial.

Description: Specific steps include appropriate physical examination, preoperative planning, and supine patient positioning. The patient is placed supine with a lower-extremity bolster under the ipsilateral extremity in order to allow improved visualization of the plantar surface of the foot. A nonsterile tourniquet is placed on the thigh. The incision site is marked out, and a longitudinal plantar incision is made until proximal healthy nerve is identified-typically approximately 1 to 2 cm, but the incision can be extended up to 6 cm. The incision is made between the metatarsals, with blunt dissection carried down to the neuroma. The neuroma is sharply excised distally through healthy nerve, and a whip stitch is placed to facilitate the collagen conduit placement. The collagen conduit is passed dorsally into the intermetatarsal space and secured to the dorsal fascia of the foot. The wound is closed with 3-0 nylon horizontal mattress sutures. Postoperatively, a soft dressing is applied to the operative extremity, and patients are advised to be non-weight-bearing for two weeks. At two weeks, patients begin partial weight-bearing with use of a boot, and physical therapy is initiated. No antibiotics are necessary, and 300 mg of gabapentin is prescribed and tapered off by the six-week follow-up visit. Follow-ups are conducted at 2, 6, 12, 24, and fifty-two weeks. It is necessary to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection, surgical complications, and neuroma recurrence during follow-up appointments.

Alternatives: Simple excision of the neuroma with proximal burial into muscle or bone is a common surgical technique. However, inadequate resection of the nerve or poor surgical technique can lead to recurrent neuromas. For neuromas not responding to simple excision, other techniques have been utilized, including cauterization, chemical agents, nerve capping, and muscle or bone burial5,6. The results of these techniques have varied, and none has gained clinical superiority over the other6.

Rationale: A study analyzing the use of collagen conduits for painful neuromas of the foot and ankle has shown this technique to be a safe and successful alternative to the previously discussed methods of resection7. That study by Gould et al. found that 85% of patients had a substantial reduction in pain, with mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores reducing from 8 to 10 preoperatively to 0 to 4 postoperatively7. Moreover, alternative biological conduits, such as the greater saphenous vein, have proven to be costly in time and resources, as this structure is often utilized in cardiovascular bypass surgery and its harvest conveys a risk of iatrogenic nerve injury to the patient7.Numerous studies focusing on excision of recurrent Morton neuromas via a plantar approach have found variable success rates. Of the patients surveyed in those studies, 75% reported substantial pain improvement. However, <50% of these queried patients reported complete pain relief8,9. Studies analyzing the dorsal approach for revision Morton neuroma excision found similar success rates. Approximately 78% of patients reported good or excellent postoperative outcomes, and significant improvements were observed in patient postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores for pain interference, intensity, and global physical health10,11. One study comparing outcomes following plantar versus dorsal approaches for recurrent Morton neuroma found no significant difference in postoperative patient outcomes. That study suggested that surgeons utilize the approach with which they are most comfortable12. Gould et al. reported an 85% success rate with collagen conduit, which was similar to if not slightly improved compared with the other prior studies. The utilization of a collagen conduit technique thus offers comparable patient outcomes for patients with difficult neuromas7.

Expected outcomes: Recurrent neuroma resection with the use of a collagen conduit has proven to provide satisfactory patient outcomes regarding pain and neuritis symptoms7. The goal of any neuroma resection is to greatly diminish or entirely eliminate nerve pain. Based on the available evidence, there has been no proven clinical superiority of any particular technique over the others6. However, in the present example case, the location of the patient's neuroma in this video makes it 85% likely that the patient will report satisfactory outcomes and 50% likely that the patient will be entirely symptom-free7. At two weeks postoperatively, the patient reported well controlled pain, absence of burning or tingling sensation, full range of movement in the foot, and intact sensation throughout all major nerve distributions, including the saphenous; superficial peroneal nerve; deep peroneal nerve; and sural, medial, and lateral plantar nerves. However, sensation is absent distal to the site of a neuroma resection.

Important tips: Careful preoperative planting is of utmost importance.Ruling out other potential pathologies is necessary to ensure proper outcomes.Meticulous dissection should be carried out, with delicate handling of the proximal nerve ending.Excision of the nerve should be done sharply through the healthy portion of the nerve.Appropriate sizing of the nerve conduit (with a commercially available industry sizer) should be performed.The nerve conduit should be passed dorsally and secured to the dorsal fascia without any tension.

Acronyms and abbreviations: MRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundVAS = visual analog scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用胶原导管进行复发性莫顿神经瘤翻修手术
背景:足部和踝部的痛性神经瘤常常因持续疼痛或切除后复发而给治疗带来难题。疼痛性神经瘤的初级手术治疗包括简单切除,并将残余神经末梢牵引至不太脆弱的位置1-4。使用胶原导管治疗复发性神经瘤具有优势,尤其是在软组织覆盖选择极少的区域,而且这种技术的手术效果患者满意度高达 85%7 。此外,使用胶原导管还能限制深层软组织剥离的需要,并降低通常与神经埋置术相关的发病率:具体步骤包括适当的体格检查、术前计划和患者仰卧位。让患者仰卧,在同侧肢体下方放置一个下肢支撑物,以便更好地观察足底表面。在大腿上绑上未经消毒的止血带。标记出切口部位,然后进行纵向足底切口,直到确定近端健康神经为止--通常约为 1 到 2 厘米,但切口可延长至 6 厘米。切口位于跖骨之间,钝性剥离直至神经瘤。通过健康神经向远端锐性切除神经瘤,并进行鞭状缝合以方便胶原导管的放置。将胶原导管背向穿过跖骨间隙,固定在足背筋膜上。用 3-0 尼龙水平褥式缝合线缝合伤口。术后,对手术肢体进行软敷料包扎,并建议患者两周内不要负重。两周后,患者开始使用靴子部分负重,并开始物理治疗。无需使用抗生素,并处方 300 毫克的加巴喷丁,在六周的随访中逐渐停用。随访时间为 2、6、12、24 和 52 周。在随访期间,有必要监测感染症状和体征、手术并发症和神经瘤复发情况:简单切除神经瘤并将其近端埋入肌肉或骨骼是一种常见的手术方法。然而,神经切除不充分或手术技术不佳会导致神经瘤复发。对于单纯切除无效的神经瘤,可采用其他技术,包括烧灼法、化学制剂、神经帽、肌肉或骨埋藏法5,6。这些技术的效果各不相同,没有一种技术在临床上优于其他技术6:理由:一项分析使用胶原导管治疗足部和踝部疼痛性神经瘤的研究表明,与之前讨论过的切除方法相比,这种技术是一种安全、成功的替代方法7。古尔德等人的研究发现,85% 的患者疼痛明显减轻,平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分从术前的 8 到 10 分降至术后的 0 到 4 分7。此外,大隐静脉等替代性生物导管已被证明在时间和资源上都是昂贵的,因为这种结构通常用于心血管搭桥手术,而且采集这种导管会给患者带来先天性神经损伤的风险7。在这些研究中接受调查的患者中,75% 的人表示疼痛得到了明显改善。然而,8,9.对采用背侧入路进行莫顿神经瘤翻修切除术进行分析的研究发现,成功率类似。约 78% 的患者报告术后效果良好或极佳,而且术后患者报告结果衡量信息系统 (PROMIS) 对疼痛干扰、疼痛强度和整体身体健康的评分也有显著改善10,11。有一项研究比较了复发性莫顿神经瘤的足底和足背入路治疗效果,结果发现患者术后效果无明显差异。该研究建议外科医生采用他们最熟悉的方法12。Gould 等人报告称,使用胶原导管的成功率为 85%,与之前的其他研究相比,即使不是略有提高,也相差无几。因此,使用胶原导管技术可为疑难神经瘤患者提供相当的治疗效果7:事实证明,使用胶原导管进行复发性神经瘤切除术可在疼痛和神经炎症状方面为患者提供令人满意的治疗效果7。任何神经瘤切除术的目标都是大大减轻或完全消除神经疼痛。根据现有的证据,还没有任何特定技术在临床上优于其他技术6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
期刊最新文献
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach. Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Displaced Radial Neck Fracture (Metaizeau Technique). Flexible Intramedullary Nail Placement in Pediatric Humerus Fractures. Ligamentum Flavum Flap Technique in Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Surgery for Pediatric Trigger Finger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1