EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524231222498
Elizabeth Namukwaya, Andrea Bruno de Sousa, Sílvia Lopes, Dorothea Petra Touwen, Jenny Theodora van der Steen, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Joanna Brooks, Stecy Yghemonos, Kawaldip Sehmi, Barbara Gomes
{"title":"EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.","authors":"Elizabeth Namukwaya, Andrea Bruno de Sousa, Sílvia Lopes, Dorothea Petra Touwen, Jenny Theodora van der Steen, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Joanna Brooks, Stecy Yghemonos, Kawaldip Sehmi, Barbara Gomes","doi":"10.1177/26323524231222498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whenever possible, a person should die where they feel it is the right place to be. There is substantial global variation in home death percentages but it is unclear whether these differences reflect preferences, and there are major limitations in how the place of death is classified and compared across countries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>EOLinPLACE is an international interdisciplinary research project funded by the European Research Council aiming to create a solid base for a ground-breaking international classification tool that will enable the mapping of preferred and actual places towards death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods observational research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We combine classic methods of developing health classifications with a bottom-up participatory research approach, working with international organizations representing patients and informal carers [International Alliance of Patients' Organizations (IAPO) and Eurocarers]. First, we will conduct an international comparative analysis of existing classification systems and routinely collected death certificate data on place of death. Secondly, we will conduct a mixed-methods study (ethnography followed by longitudinal quantitative study) in four countries (the Netherlands, Portugal, Uganda and the United States), to compare the preferences and experiences of patients with life-threatening conditions and their families. Thirdly, based on the generated evidence, we will build a contemporary classification of dying places; assess its content validity through focus groups with patients, carers and other stakeholders; and evaluate it in a psychometric study to examine construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, data quality and interpretability.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>Approved by the ethics committee of the University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (CE-068-2022) and committees in each of the participating countries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings will provide a deeper understanding of the diversity in individual end-of-life pathways. They will enable key developments such as measurement of progress towards achievement of preferences when care can be planned. The project will open new directions in how to care for the dying.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Research Registry UIN 9213.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231222498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whenever possible, a person should die where they feel it is the right place to be. There is substantial global variation in home death percentages but it is unclear whether these differences reflect preferences, and there are major limitations in how the place of death is classified and compared across countries.

Objectives: EOLinPLACE is an international interdisciplinary research project funded by the European Research Council aiming to create a solid base for a ground-breaking international classification tool that will enable the mapping of preferred and actual places towards death.

Design: Mixed-methods observational research.

Methods and analysis: We combine classic methods of developing health classifications with a bottom-up participatory research approach, working with international organizations representing patients and informal carers [International Alliance of Patients' Organizations (IAPO) and Eurocarers]. First, we will conduct an international comparative analysis of existing classification systems and routinely collected death certificate data on place of death. Secondly, we will conduct a mixed-methods study (ethnography followed by longitudinal quantitative study) in four countries (the Netherlands, Portugal, Uganda and the United States), to compare the preferences and experiences of patients with life-threatening conditions and their families. Thirdly, based on the generated evidence, we will build a contemporary classification of dying places; assess its content validity through focus groups with patients, carers and other stakeholders; and evaluate it in a psychometric study to examine construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, data quality and interpretability.

Ethics: Approved by the ethics committee of the University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (CE-068-2022) and committees in each of the participating countries.

Discussion: The findings will provide a deeper understanding of the diversity in individual end-of-life pathways. They will enable key developments such as measurement of progress towards achievement of preferences when care can be planned. The project will open new directions in how to care for the dying.

Trial registration: Research Registry UIN 9213.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EOLinPLACE:一个旨在改革临终场所分类和理解方式的国际研究项目。
背景:在可能的情况下,人应该在自己认为合适的地方死去。在全球范围内,居家死亡的比例存在很大差异,但目前尚不清楚这些差异是否反映了人们的偏好,而且各国在死亡地点的分类和比较方面也存在很大的局限性:EOLinPLACE是一个由欧洲研究理事会资助的国际跨学科研究项目,旨在为一个开创性的国际分类工具奠定坚实的基础,从而能够绘制首选和实际死亡地点图:方法与分析:我们与代表患者和非正式照护者的国际组织[国际患者组织联盟(IAPO)和欧洲照护者组织]合作,将制定健康分类的经典方法与自下而上的参与式研究方法相结合。首先,我们将对现有的分类系统和例行收集的死亡证明书中有关死亡地点的数据进行国际比较分析。其次,我们将在四个国家(荷兰、葡萄牙、乌干达和美国)开展一项混合方法研究(先进行人种学研究,再进行纵向定量研究),以比较生命垂危患者及其家属的偏好和经历。第三,根据所获得的证据,我们将建立一个当代临终场所分类法;通过与患者、照护者和其他利益相关者进行焦点小组讨论,评估其内容的有效性;并在心理测量研究中对其进行评估,以检查其构建有效性、可靠性、响应性、数据质量和可解释性:伦理:已获得科英布拉大学医学院伦理委员会(CE-068-2022)和各参与国伦理委员会的批准:讨论:研究结果将使人们更深入地了解个体生命终结途径的多样性。讨论:研究结果将使人们更深入地了解个体临终路径的多样性,并促进关键的发展,如在规划护理时衡量实现偏好的进展情况。该项目将为临终关怀开辟新的方向:研究注册 UIN 9213。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical influence: what does success look like? Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study. Using relational ethics to approach equity in palliative care. Fostering timely integrated palliative care in nursing homes through critical companionship: experiences from a Padi-Palli interventional study in France. Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1