Evidence Supporting Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hayder Suhail Najm Alareer, Arvin Arian, Maryam Fotouhi, Hayder Jasim Taher, Ayoob Dinar Abdullah
{"title":"Evidence Supporting Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hayder Suhail Najm Alareer, Arvin Arian, Maryam Fotouhi, Hayder Jasim Taher, Ayoob Dinar Abdullah","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on the Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System (LI-RADS) guidelines, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed using imaging criteria in patients at risk of HCC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LI-RADS in high-risk patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review is conducted on international databases, including Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PROQUEST, and Cochrane Library, with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated, and all the data were analyzed using STATA version 16. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined using a random-effects meta-analysis approach. Also, we used the chi-squared test and I<sup>2</sup> index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and Funnel plots and Egger tests were used for evaluating publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sensitivity was estimated at 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). According to different types of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS), the highest pooled sensitivity was in version 2018 (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) (I<sup>2</sup>: 80.6%, <i>P</i> of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T<sup>2</sup>: 0.001). The pooled specificity was estimated as 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). According to different types of LI-RADS, the highest pooled specificity was in version 2014 (93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I<sup>2</sup>: 81.7%, <i>P</i> of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T<sup>2</sup>: 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LI-RADS can assist radiologists in achieving the required sensitivity and specificity in high-risk patients suspected to have HCC. Therefore, this strategy can serve as an appropriate tool for identifying HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on the Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System (LI-RADS) guidelines, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed using imaging criteria in patients at risk of HCC.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LI-RADS in high-risk patients with HCC.

Material and methods: This systematic review is conducted on international databases, including Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PROQUEST, and Cochrane Library, with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated, and all the data were analyzed using STATA version 16. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined using a random-effects meta-analysis approach. Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and Funnel plots and Egger tests were used for evaluating publication bias.

Results: The pooled sensitivity was estimated at 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). According to different types of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS), the highest pooled sensitivity was in version 2018 (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) (I2: 80.6%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). The pooled specificity was estimated as 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). According to different types of LI-RADS, the highest pooled specificity was in version 2014 (93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I2: 81.7%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001).

Conclusion: LI-RADS can assist radiologists in achieving the required sensitivity and specificity in high-risk patients suspected to have HCC. Therefore, this strategy can serve as an appropriate tool for identifying HCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝脏成像报告和数据系统对基于 CT 和 MR 成像的肝细胞癌诊断价值的支持证据:系统综述和 Meta 分析。
背景:根据肝脏成像数据和报告系统(LI-RADS)指南,肝细胞癌(HCC)可通过成像标准对高危患者进行诊断:本研究旨在评估 LI-RADS 对高危 HCC 患者的诊断价值:本系统性综述在谷歌学术、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、PROQUEST 和 Cochrane Library 等国际数据库中以适当的关键词进行检索。使用二项分布公式计算每项研究的方差,并使用 STATA 16 版本对所有数据进行分析。采用随机效应荟萃分析法确定了汇总的敏感性和特异性。此外,我们还使用卡方检验和 I2 指数来计算研究之间的异质性,并使用 Funnel 图和 Egger 检验来评估发表偏倚:汇总灵敏度估计为 0.80(95% CI 0.76-0.84)。根据肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)的不同类型,2018版的汇总灵敏度最高(0.83(95% CI 0.79-0.87))(I2:80.6%,异质性检验P:0.001)。集合特异性估计为 0.89(95% CI 0.87-0.92)。根据 LI-RADS 的不同类型,2014 版的集合特异性最高(93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I2: 81.7%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity 2: 0.001):LI-RADS可帮助放射科医生在怀疑患有HCC的高危患者中达到所需的灵敏度和特异性。因此,该策略可作为鉴别 HCC 的适当工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
期刊最新文献
A Neural Network-based Approach to Prediction of Preterm Birth using Non-invasive Tests. Altered Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations of rs-fMRI Signal followed by rTMS Analgesic Effects in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Patients. Comparative Evaluation of LED Light Application and Heat Generation with Three Different Wavelengths of Frequency on Soft Tissues in Bringing Faster Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Finite Element Model Study. Feasibility of Robot-Assistance Hand Physiotherapy in Post-Stroke Patients. Impact of Electronic Collimation on Reducing Unnecessary Patient Dose in Digital Radiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1