Design organization and clinical processes around patient characteristics: Evidence from a multiple case study of Hemophilia.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1177/09514848241231585
Stefano Villa, Raimondo De Cristofaro, Giovanni Di Minno, Simone Laratro, Flora Peyvandi, Lara Pippo, Sara Villa, Antonio G De Belvis
{"title":"Design organization and clinical processes around patient characteristics: Evidence from a multiple case study of Hemophilia.","authors":"Stefano Villa, Raimondo De Cristofaro, Giovanni Di Minno, Simone Laratro, Flora Peyvandi, Lara Pippo, Sara Villa, Antonio G De Belvis","doi":"10.1177/09514848241231585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is growing evidence of the relevance of designing organization of care around patient characteristics; this is especially true in the case of complex chronic diseases.<b>Purpose:</b> The goal of the paper - that focuses on the analysis of the clinical condition hemophilia in three different centers - is to address two different research questions:1. How can we define, within the same clinical condition, different patient profiles homogeneous in terms of intensity of service required (e.g. number of visits or diagnostics)? 2. What are the conditions to re-organize care around these patient profiles in a multidisciplinary and coordinated manner?<b>Research design:</b> The authors have used a multiple case study approach combining both qualitative and quantitative methodologies; in particularly the semi-structured interviews and the direct observation were aimed to map the process in order to come up with an estimate of the cost of the full cycle of care.<b>Study sample:</b> The research methodology has been applied consistently in three different centers. The selection of the structures has been based on two main different criteria: (i) high standards regarding both organizational and clinical aspects and (ii) willingness from management, nurses and physicians to provide data.<b>Results:</b> The study clearly shows that different patient profiles - within the same clinical condition - trigger a different set of diagnostic and therapeutic activities. It is, thus, important considering patient characteristics in the development and implementation of clinical pathways and this will imply relevant differences in terms of organizational and economic impact.<b>Conclusions:</b> These process-based analyses are very much critical especially if we want to move to a bundled and integrated payment system but, as shown by this study itself, require a lot of time and efforts since our healthcare information systems are still fragmented and vertically designed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"9514848241231585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848241231585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence of the relevance of designing organization of care around patient characteristics; this is especially true in the case of complex chronic diseases.Purpose: The goal of the paper - that focuses on the analysis of the clinical condition hemophilia in three different centers - is to address two different research questions:1. How can we define, within the same clinical condition, different patient profiles homogeneous in terms of intensity of service required (e.g. number of visits or diagnostics)? 2. What are the conditions to re-organize care around these patient profiles in a multidisciplinary and coordinated manner?Research design: The authors have used a multiple case study approach combining both qualitative and quantitative methodologies; in particularly the semi-structured interviews and the direct observation were aimed to map the process in order to come up with an estimate of the cost of the full cycle of care.Study sample: The research methodology has been applied consistently in three different centers. The selection of the structures has been based on two main different criteria: (i) high standards regarding both organizational and clinical aspects and (ii) willingness from management, nurses and physicians to provide data.Results: The study clearly shows that different patient profiles - within the same clinical condition - trigger a different set of diagnostic and therapeutic activities. It is, thus, important considering patient characteristics in the development and implementation of clinical pathways and this will imply relevant differences in terms of organizational and economic impact.Conclusions: These process-based analyses are very much critical especially if we want to move to a bundled and integrated payment system but, as shown by this study itself, require a lot of time and efforts since our healthcare information systems are still fragmented and vertically designed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围绕患者特征设计组织和临床流程:来自血友病多病例研究的证据。
背景:目的:本文重点分析了三个不同中心的血友病临床病症,旨在解决两个不同的研究问题:1.在同一临床病症中,我们如何界定在所需服务强度(如就诊次数或诊断)方面具有同质性的不同患者特征?2.2. 以多学科协调的方式,围绕这些病人特征重新组织护理的条件是什么?作者采用了多种案例研究方法,结合了定性和定量方法;特别是半结构式访谈和直接观察,旨在绘制流程图,以估算整个护理周期的成本:研究样本:研究方法在三个不同的中心得到了一致的应用。研究样本:研究方法一直在三个不同的中心进行,选择这些中心主要基于两个不同的标准:(i) 组织和临床方面的高标准;(ii) 管理层、护士和医生愿意提供数据:研究清楚地表明,在相同的临床条件下,不同的病人情况会引发不同的诊断和治疗活动。因此,在制定和实施临床路径时必须考虑患者的特征,这将意味着在组织和经济影响方面存在相关差异:这些基于流程的分析非常重要,特别是如果我们想转向捆绑式综合支付系统的话,但正如本研究本身所显示的那样,由于我们的医疗信息系统仍然是零散和垂直设计的,因此需要大量的时间和精力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid managers in an evolving healthcare: Does gender matter? A framework for lean implementation in preoperative assessment: Evidence from a high complexity hospital in Italy. A multi-dimensional study of organisational boundaries and silos in the healthcare sector. "A different sense of what we do here, who we are and what we deliver": Provider perspectives on the effects of a change in governance of healthcare services in correctional facilities in British Columbia. Delphi Plus: A novel methodology for identifying evidence-based data standards for health service decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1