Medical ethics questions of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant and lactating women in East Asia and Oceania.

Q2 Medicine Clinica Terapeutica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7417/CT.2024.5035
R Scendoni, P Fedeli, L Tomassini, M Cingolani
{"title":"Medical ethics questions of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant and lactating women in East Asia and Oceania.","authors":"R Scendoni, P Fedeli, L Tomassini, M Cingolani","doi":"10.7417/CT.2024.5035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>We aimed to investigate some of the medical ethics issues that characterize the COVID-19 vaccination phase in pregnancy and breast-feeding. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, focusing mainly on the countries of East Asia and Oceania. Vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding appears to help protect babies from COVID-19 by enabling antibodies to pass from mother to baby. However, individual countries of the same continent may adopt conflicting policy positions. Not only that, indications on the type of vaccine sometimes vary, depending on whether a woman is pregnant or breastfeeding. In this review we have taken into considerationp the policy positions on pregnancy and lactation by country and type of Covid-19 vaccine in East Asia and Oceania. Ten out of the 18 countries considered (representing more than two thirds of the population of East Asia and Oceania) provide different vaccine indications for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Can this diversity of recommendations be seen as a form of optimal protection for women in these categories, or does it suggest that some countries have taken a defensive position to avoid compensation claims in the event of complications? Is it ethically correct to leave questions concerning informed consent open? Misin-formation during a health crisis leaves people without protection and with increased vaccine hesitancy, especially for vulnerable populations in hard-to-reach areas of East Asia and Oceania.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2024.5035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: We aimed to investigate some of the medical ethics issues that characterize the COVID-19 vaccination phase in pregnancy and breast-feeding. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, focusing mainly on the countries of East Asia and Oceania. Vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding appears to help protect babies from COVID-19 by enabling antibodies to pass from mother to baby. However, individual countries of the same continent may adopt conflicting policy positions. Not only that, indications on the type of vaccine sometimes vary, depending on whether a woman is pregnant or breastfeeding. In this review we have taken into considerationp the policy positions on pregnancy and lactation by country and type of Covid-19 vaccine in East Asia and Oceania. Ten out of the 18 countries considered (representing more than two thirds of the population of East Asia and Oceania) provide different vaccine indications for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Can this diversity of recommendations be seen as a form of optimal protection for women in these categories, or does it suggest that some countries have taken a defensive position to avoid compensation claims in the event of complications? Is it ethically correct to leave questions concerning informed consent open? Misin-formation during a health crisis leaves people without protection and with increased vaccine hesitancy, especially for vulnerable populations in hard-to-reach areas of East Asia and Oceania.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东亚和大洋洲孕妇和哺乳期妇女接种 COVID-19 疫苗的医学伦理问题。
摘要:我们旨在调查妊娠期和哺乳期接种 COVID-19 疫苗所涉及的一些医学伦理问题。我们使用 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了文献检索,主要集中在东亚和大洋洲国家。在孕期和母乳喂养期间接种疫苗似乎有助于抗体从母亲传递给婴儿,从而保护婴儿免受 COVID-19 的感染。然而,同一大洲的个别国家可能会采取相互矛盾的政策立场。不仅如此,疫苗类型的指示有时也会因妇女是怀孕还是哺乳而有所不同。在本综述中,我们按东亚和大洋洲的国家和 Covid-19 疫苗类型考虑了有关怀孕和哺乳的政策立场p。在所考虑的 18 个国家中,有 10 个国家(占东亚和大洋洲人口的三分之二以上)为孕妇和哺乳期妇女提供了不同的疫苗适应症。这种建议的多样性是否可以被视为对这些类别妇女的一种最佳保护,还是表明一些国家采取了防御性立场,以避免在出现并发症时提出赔偿要求?对知情同意问题持开放态度在伦理上是否正确?健康危机期间的错误信息使人们得不到保护,并增加了对疫苗的犹豫,尤其是东亚和大洋洲难以到达地区的弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
A denigration curve to delineate the spread of communication about obstetric staff errors in Italy and its practical application. An Anomalous Origin of the Accessory Splenic Artery and its Significance in Surgical and Radiological Contexts: A Case Report. Case of tracheal rupture after endotracheal intubation: clinical risk management and medico-legal considerations. Diagnostic performance of 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in the assessment of brain stem glioma grading. Eggshell membrane as a regenerative material in alveolar bone grafting in combination with advanced platelet rich fibrin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1