COMPARISON OF C-PEPTIDE LEVELS IN MONOGENIC FORMS OF DIABETES WITH OTHER TYPES OF DIABETES: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.4183/aeb.2023.281
D Geneş, Z Pekkolay, M Şimşek, H Saraçoğlu, M Turgut, S Tekeş, A K Tuzcu
{"title":"COMPARISON OF C-PEPTIDE LEVELS IN MONOGENIC FORMS OF DIABETES WITH OTHER TYPES OF DIABETES: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY.","authors":"D Geneş, Z Pekkolay, M Şimşek, H Saraçoğlu, M Turgut, S Tekeş, A K Tuzcu","doi":"10.4183/aeb.2023.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utility of C-peptide levels in the differentiation of monogenic forms of diabetes from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A total of 104 patients aged >16 who visited the Dicle University's Faculty of Medicine between April 2011 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with monogenic diabetes by genetic analysis or with T1DM and T2DM were randomly selected for retrospective evaluation. The C-peptide levels of these patients at the time of diagnosis of diabetes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 104 patients, 24 (23%) were diagnosed with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), 40 (38.5%) with T1DM, and 40 (38.5%) with T2DM. Median C-peptide levels (ng/mL) (interquartile range) were 1.78 (1.24-2.88) in MODY group, 0.86 (0.34-1.22) in T1DM group, and 2.38 (1.58-4.27) in T2DM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a difference in C-peptide levels between MODY and T1DM groups but not between MODY and T2DM groups. As per clinical evaluations, although C-peptide levels of patients with MODY are similar to those of patients with T2DM patients, the possibility of C-peptide levels being similar to those required for T1DM diagnosis should also be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50902,"journal":{"name":"Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest","volume":"19 3","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10863950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2023.281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of C-peptide levels in the differentiation of monogenic forms of diabetes from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice.

Subjects and methods: A total of 104 patients aged >16 who visited the Dicle University's Faculty of Medicine between April 2011 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with monogenic diabetes by genetic analysis or with T1DM and T2DM were randomly selected for retrospective evaluation. The C-peptide levels of these patients at the time of diagnosis of diabetes were compared.

Results: Of the 104 patients, 24 (23%) were diagnosed with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), 40 (38.5%) with T1DM, and 40 (38.5%) with T2DM. Median C-peptide levels (ng/mL) (interquartile range) were 1.78 (1.24-2.88) in MODY group, 0.86 (0.34-1.22) in T1DM group, and 2.38 (1.58-4.27) in T2DM group.

Conclusions: There was a difference in C-peptide levels between MODY and T1DM groups but not between MODY and T2DM groups. As per clinical evaluations, although C-peptide levels of patients with MODY are similar to those of patients with T2DM patients, the possibility of C-peptide levels being similar to those required for T1DM diagnosis should also be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单基因糖尿病与其他类型糖尿病的 c 肽水平比较:单中心研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估C肽水平在临床实践中区分单基因糖尿病与1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的实用性:随机选取2011年4月至2020年12月期间就诊于迪凯尔大学医学院、年龄大于16岁、通过基因分析确诊为单基因糖尿病或T1DM和T2DM的104名患者进行回顾性评估。结果显示,在104名患者中,有24人(23人)被确诊为糖尿病:结果:在 104 名患者中,有 24 人(23%)被诊断为成熟-发病型青年糖尿病(MODY),40 人(38.5%)被诊断为 T1DM,40 人(38.5%)被诊断为 T2DM。中位 C 肽水平(纳克/毫升)(四分位数间距)分别为:MODY 组 1.78(1.24-2.88),T1DM 组 0.86(0.34-1.22),T2DM 组 2.38(1.58-4.27):结论:C肽水平在 MODY 组和 T1DM 组之间存在差异,但在 MODY 组和 T2DM 组之间没有差异。根据临床评估,虽然 MODY 患者的 C 肽水平与 T2DM 患者相似,但也应考虑 C 肽水平与 T1DM 诊断要求相似的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest
Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) is an international journal covering the fields of basic and clinical Endocrinology, Neuroendocrinology, Reproductive Medicine, Chronobiology, Human Ethology published quarterly Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) is the official international journal of the Romanian Society for Endocrinology. It continues the former Romanian Journal of Endocrinology
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC INTEREST ABOUT OSTEOPOROSIS USING GOOGLE TRENDS: ARE SEASON AND ECONOMY EFFECTIVE? CONGENITAL HYPOTHYROIDISM SCREENING RESULTS IN THE TURKISH PROVINCE OF ADIYAMAN IN 2015-2020. EFFICACY AND PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PAPILLARY THYROID CANCER WITH POSTOPERATIVE PREABLATIVE STIMULATED THYROGLOBULIN ABOVE 10 NG/ML AFTER INITIAL THERAPY WITH RADIOIODINE. ENDOCRINOLOGICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN ASSESSING INFERTILITY AT REPRODUCTIVE AGE. EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PARATHYROID INCIDENTALOMAS DETECTED BY ROUTINE NECK ULTRASONOGRAPHY WITH A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINICAL APPROACH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1