{"title":"Movement analysis of the distal transverse arch of the dominant hand while grasping and pinching objects: A descriptive, correlational research study","authors":"Hideki Shiraishi OT, PhD , Hiroshi Yuine OT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The distal transverse arches obtained from active and passive motions<span> of the hand and the used range of motion (u-ROM) of the hand arch in activities of daily living have rarely been reported.</span></div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the distal transverse arch angle of the dominant hand, the influence of age, and the u-ROM of the arch when grasping and pinching objects.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Descriptive and correlational research design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>The active and passive distal transverse arches of the dominant hand of 104 healthy subjects were measured using a </span>goniometer. Additionally, the hand arch was measured when the subjects grasped and pinched objects. These data were used to analyze the correlation with age and to calculate the u-ROM (u-ROM %) rate of the distal transversal arch. Furthermore, the u-ROM% between the ring and fifth finger components of the hand arch was compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The active and passive dorsal arch angles were 135.8 (10.0°) and 169.9 (11.5°), respectively. The distal transverse arch angle tended to decline with age (active: <em>r</em> = −0.18, <em>p</em> = 0.07, 95% confidence interval = −0.36 to 0.02; passive: <em>r</em> = −0.40, <em>p</em> ≤ 0.001, 95% confidence interval = −0.55 to −0.23). The u-ROM% of the hand arch in grasping and pinching ranged from 65.5 (9.8)% to 84.6 (11.6)% and from 52.1 (7.9)% to 67.4 (9.1)%, respectively, against active and passive motions. The ring finger component was significantly higher than the fifth finger component (active: <em>p</em> = 0.08 to <0.001, effect size = −0.17 to −0.69; passive: <em>p</em> ≤ 0.001, effect size= −0.71 to −0.86). A similar trend was observed in both men and women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Therapists should evaluate the movement of the distal transverse arch of the injured hand in detail and consider the age, sex, and component of the hand arch when intervening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 563-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The distal transverse arches obtained from active and passive motions of the hand and the used range of motion (u-ROM) of the hand arch in activities of daily living have rarely been reported.
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the distal transverse arch angle of the dominant hand, the influence of age, and the u-ROM of the arch when grasping and pinching objects.
Study Design
Descriptive and correlational research design.
Methods
The active and passive distal transverse arches of the dominant hand of 104 healthy subjects were measured using a goniometer. Additionally, the hand arch was measured when the subjects grasped and pinched objects. These data were used to analyze the correlation with age and to calculate the u-ROM (u-ROM %) rate of the distal transversal arch. Furthermore, the u-ROM% between the ring and fifth finger components of the hand arch was compared.
Results
The active and passive dorsal arch angles were 135.8 (10.0°) and 169.9 (11.5°), respectively. The distal transverse arch angle tended to decline with age (active: r = −0.18, p = 0.07, 95% confidence interval = −0.36 to 0.02; passive: r = −0.40, p ≤ 0.001, 95% confidence interval = −0.55 to −0.23). The u-ROM% of the hand arch in grasping and pinching ranged from 65.5 (9.8)% to 84.6 (11.6)% and from 52.1 (7.9)% to 67.4 (9.1)%, respectively, against active and passive motions. The ring finger component was significantly higher than the fifth finger component (active: p = 0.08 to <0.001, effect size = −0.17 to −0.69; passive: p ≤ 0.001, effect size= −0.71 to −0.86). A similar trend was observed in both men and women.
Conclusions
Therapists should evaluate the movement of the distal transverse arch of the injured hand in detail and consider the age, sex, and component of the hand arch when intervening.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.