Thrown in at the deep end: a qualitative study with physicians on the purpose and challenges of discharge interviews.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2319566
Lorena Morschek, Jobst-Hendrik Schultz, Ricarda Wigbels, Nadja Gebhardt, Cassandra Derreza-Greeven, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Alexandra Noll, Inga Unger, Christoph Nikendei, Till Johannes Bugaj
{"title":"Thrown in at the deep end: a qualitative study with physicians on the purpose and challenges of discharge interviews.","authors":"Lorena Morschek, Jobst-Hendrik Schultz, Ricarda Wigbels, Nadja Gebhardt, Cassandra Derreza-Greeven, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Alexandra Noll, Inga Unger, Christoph Nikendei, Till Johannes Bugaj","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2319566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Against the backdrop of poor discharge communication in hospitals, this study explores the purpose of discharge interviews from the physicians' perspective and the challenges they are confronted with. Discharge interviews are legally required in Germany as part of the discharge management. Led by the ward physician, the discharge interview should summarize relevant information about the hospital stay, medication, lifestyle interventions and follow-up treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with <i>n</i> = 12 physicians were conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital between February and April 2020. Qualitative content analysis was carried out using MAXQDA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians reported gaining information, providing information, and answering open-ended questions as the purpose of the discharge interview. Challenges in conducting discharge interviews were related to finding a common language, patient-related challenges, conditions of everyday ward life, and lack of training. Physicians reported receiving no explicit training on discharge interviews. While professional experience seems to mitigate the lack of training, some physicians expressed a prevailing sense of insecurity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of preparation for discharge interviews in medical school makes it particularly challenging for physicians to translate their theoretical knowledge into patient-centered discharge communication. Medical training on discharge interviews should be expanded in terms of theoretical input on the ideal content, its purpose and potential (e.g. in reducing readmissions), as well as practical exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"180-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2319566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Against the backdrop of poor discharge communication in hospitals, this study explores the purpose of discharge interviews from the physicians' perspective and the challenges they are confronted with. Discharge interviews are legally required in Germany as part of the discharge management. Led by the ward physician, the discharge interview should summarize relevant information about the hospital stay, medication, lifestyle interventions and follow-up treatment.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with n = 12 physicians were conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital between February and April 2020. Qualitative content analysis was carried out using MAXQDA.

Results: Physicians reported gaining information, providing information, and answering open-ended questions as the purpose of the discharge interview. Challenges in conducting discharge interviews were related to finding a common language, patient-related challenges, conditions of everyday ward life, and lack of training. Physicians reported receiving no explicit training on discharge interviews. While professional experience seems to mitigate the lack of training, some physicians expressed a prevailing sense of insecurity.

Conclusion: The lack of preparation for discharge interviews in medical school makes it particularly challenging for physicians to translate their theoretical knowledge into patient-centered discharge communication. Medical training on discharge interviews should be expanded in terms of theoretical input on the ideal content, its purpose and potential (e.g. in reducing readmissions), as well as practical exercises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深陷其中:与医生就出院面谈的目的和挑战进行的定性研究。
目的:在医院出院沟通不畅的背景下,本研究从医生的角度探讨了出院面谈的目的以及他们所面临的挑战。德国法律规定,出院面谈是出院管理的一部分。出院面谈应由病房医生主持,总结住院、用药、生活方式干预和后续治疗的相关信息:2020 年 2 月至 4 月期间,海德堡大学医院对 n = 12 名医生进行了半结构化访谈。采用 MAXQDA 进行了定性内容分析:出院访谈的目的包括获取信息、提供信息和回答开放式问题。进行出院访谈的挑战与寻找共同语言、患者相关挑战、病房日常生活条件和缺乏培训有关。医生们表示没有接受过关于出院面谈的明确培训。虽然专业经验似乎可以缓解缺乏培训的问题,但一些医生表示普遍存在不安全感:结论:医学院缺乏对出院面谈的准备,这使得医生将理论知识转化为以患者为中心的出院沟通尤其具有挑战性。出院面谈的医学培训应在理想内容的理论输入、其目的和潜力(如减少再入院率)以及实践练习方面加以扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremia in adult with cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Thickening liquids for pediatric dysphagia: a perspective from clinical practice. Association of plasma aldosterone concentration with arterial stiffness progression in hypertensive patients: insights from a longitudinal analysis. Preoperative intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for elective surgery: evidence based on 12 randomized trials. Factors associated with renal involvement in adult immunoglobulin a vasculitis: what is it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1