Estimated plasma volume status is a simple and quick tool that could help define the severity of patients with infection on arrival at the emergency department

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.003
Gianni Turcato MD , Arian Zaboli RN , Serena Sibilio RN , Francesco Brigo MD
{"title":"Estimated plasma volume status is a simple and quick tool that could help define the severity of patients with infection on arrival at the emergency department","authors":"Gianni Turcato MD ,&nbsp;Arian Zaboli RN ,&nbsp;Serena Sibilio RN ,&nbsp;Francesco Brigo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Infectious states are subtle and rapidly evolving conditions observed daily in the emergency department (ED), and their prognostic evaluation remains a complex clinical challenge. Recently, estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has been suggested to have a prognostic role in conditions where volemic alteration is central to the pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to verify whether ePVS recorded at ED admission can provide prognostic indications of 30-day mortality in patients with infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective observational study was performed between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 at the ED of the Merano Hospital. All patients with infection were enrolled. ePVS values were derived from haemoglobin and haematocrit measured on the immediate arrival of patients in the ED. The predictive power of ePVS for 30-day mortality was assessed using a multivariate model adjusted for severity, comorbidity and urgency. Kaplan–Meier analysis was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 949 patients with infection enrolled in the study (47.9%, SOFA ≥2), 8.9% (84/949) died at 30 days. The median ePVS value was higher in patients who died at 30 days than in patients who survived (5.83 vs. 4.61, p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ePVS in both continuous and categorical form around the median was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality even after adjusting for severity, comorbidity and urgency. Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed an increased risk of death in patients with high ePVS values.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ePVS recorded on ED admission of patients with infection was an independent predictor of risk for 30-day mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002962924010620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infectious states are subtle and rapidly evolving conditions observed daily in the emergency department (ED), and their prognostic evaluation remains a complex clinical challenge. Recently, estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has been suggested to have a prognostic role in conditions where volemic alteration is central to the pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to verify whether ePVS recorded at ED admission can provide prognostic indications of 30-day mortality in patients with infection.

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 at the ED of the Merano Hospital. All patients with infection were enrolled. ePVS values were derived from haemoglobin and haematocrit measured on the immediate arrival of patients in the ED. The predictive power of ePVS for 30-day mortality was assessed using a multivariate model adjusted for severity, comorbidity and urgency. Kaplan–Meier analysis was also performed.

Results

Of the 949 patients with infection enrolled in the study (47.9%, SOFA ≥2), 8.9% (84/949) died at 30 days. The median ePVS value was higher in patients who died at 30 days than in patients who survived (5.83 vs. 4.61, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ePVS in both continuous and categorical form around the median was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality even after adjusting for severity, comorbidity and urgency. Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed an increased risk of death in patients with high ePVS values.

Conclusions

ePVS recorded on ED admission of patients with infection was an independent predictor of risk for 30-day mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计血浆容量状态是一种简单快捷的工具,有助于确定急诊科感染患者的严重程度。
背景:感染状态是急诊科(ED)每天都会观察到的微妙而快速变化的情况,其预后评估仍然是一项复杂的临床挑战。最近,估计血浆容量状态(ePVS)被认为在以血容量改变为病理生理学核心的情况下具有预后作用。本研究旨在验证急诊室入院时记录的 ePVS 是否能提供感染患者 30 天死亡率的预后指标:方法:2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间,在梅拉诺医院急诊科开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。ePVS 值来自患者刚到急诊室时测量的血红蛋白和血细胞比容。采用多变量模型评估了 ePVS 对 30 天死亡率的预测能力,并对严重程度、合并症和紧急程度进行了调整。同时还进行了卡普兰-梅耶分析:在参与研究的 949 名感染患者(47.9% SOFA ≥ 2)中,8.9%(84/949)在 30 天后死亡。30 天后死亡患者的 ePVS 中位值高于存活患者(5.83 vs. 4.61,p < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,即使调整了严重程度、合并症和紧急程度,中位数附近的连续和分类形式的 ePVS 仍是 30 天内死亡的独立风险因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析证实,ePVS 值高的患者死亡风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1