Analogical structure sense: A case study of students’ analogical reasoning between groups and rings

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Mathematical Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101136
Michael D. Hicks , Kyle Flanagan
{"title":"Analogical structure sense: A case study of students’ analogical reasoning between groups and rings","authors":"Michael D. Hicks ,&nbsp;Kyle Flanagan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analogical reasoning is an important mathematical process for undergraduate students. However, it is unclear how students understand analogies that are presented to them, and more importantly, how students understand and create their own analogies. In this paper, we present a case study of four students as they reason analogically about several structures in abstract algebra. In particular, we expand on the notion of structure sense to include a wider range of structures in advanced mathematics and attend to each students’ <em>analogical structure sense</em> associated with each structure. Findings suggest that although students may possess a strong structure sense for group-theoretic structures, it is not necessarily the case that they possess a comparatively strong analogical sense of structure for ring-theoretic structures. In addition, those students with weaker senses of structure for group-theoretic structures are still able express productive reasoning about ring-theoretic analogies. Implications for future research and instructional practice are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312324000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analogical reasoning is an important mathematical process for undergraduate students. However, it is unclear how students understand analogies that are presented to them, and more importantly, how students understand and create their own analogies. In this paper, we present a case study of four students as they reason analogically about several structures in abstract algebra. In particular, we expand on the notion of structure sense to include a wider range of structures in advanced mathematics and attend to each students’ analogical structure sense associated with each structure. Findings suggest that although students may possess a strong structure sense for group-theoretic structures, it is not necessarily the case that they possess a comparatively strong analogical sense of structure for ring-theoretic structures. In addition, those students with weaker senses of structure for group-theoretic structures are still able express productive reasoning about ring-theoretic analogies. Implications for future research and instructional practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类比结构感:学生在组与环之间进行类比推理的案例研究
对于本科生来说,类比推理是一个重要的数学过程。然而,学生如何理解呈现给他们的类比,以及更重要的是,学生如何理解并创建自己的类比,目前尚不清楚。在本文中,我们对四名学生进行了案例研究,他们对抽象代数中的几种结构进行了类比推理。特别是,我们扩展了结构感的概念,将高等数学中更广泛的结构纳入其中,并关注每个学生与每个结构相关的类比结构感。研究结果表明,虽然学生可能对群论结构具有较强的结构感,但并不一定对环论结构具有相对较强的类比结构感。此外,那些对群论结构的结构感较弱的学生仍然能够对环论类比进行富有成效的推理。本文讨论了未来研究和教学实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
Journal of Mathematical Behavior EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior solicits original research on the learning and teaching of mathematics. We are interested especially in basic research, research that aims to clarify, in detail and depth, how mathematical ideas develop in learners. Over three decades, our experience confirms a founding premise of this journal: that mathematical thinking, hence mathematics learning as a social enterprise, is special. It is special because mathematics is special, both logically and psychologically. Logically, through the way that mathematical ideas and methods have been built, refined and organized for centuries across a range of cultures; and psychologically, through the variety of ways people today, in many walks of life, make sense of mathematics, develop it, make it their own.
期刊最新文献
Encouraging students to explain their ideas when learning mathematics: A psychological perspective Lecturers' use of questions in undergraduate mathematics lectures Secondary teachers’ guided reinvention of the definitions of reducible and irreducible elements Creating and sharing linear algebra metaphors as an assessment for engaging students beyond the cognitive domain Engagement with student written work as an instantiation of and proxy for how college calculus instructors engage with student thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1