Mechanical characterization and torsional buckling of pediatric cardiovascular materials

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1007/s10237-023-01809-z
Samir Donmazov, Senol Piskin, Tansu Gölcez, Demet Kul, Ahmet Arnaz, Kerem Pekkan
{"title":"Mechanical characterization and torsional buckling of pediatric cardiovascular materials","authors":"Samir Donmazov,&nbsp;Senol Piskin,&nbsp;Tansu Gölcez,&nbsp;Demet Kul,&nbsp;Ahmet Arnaz,&nbsp;Kerem Pekkan","doi":"10.1007/s10237-023-01809-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In complex cardiovascular surgical reconstructions, conduit materials that avoid possible large-scale structural deformations should be considered. A fundamental mode of mechanical complication is torsional buckling which occurs at the anastomosis site due to the mechanical instability, leading surgical conduit/patch surface deformation. The objective of this study is to investigate the torsional buckling behavior of commonly used materials and to develop a practical method for estimating the critical buckling rotation angle under physiological intramural vessel pressures. For this task, mechanical tests of four clinically approved materials, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), Dacron, porcine and bovine pericardia, commonly used in pediatric cardiovascular surgeries, are conducted (<i>n</i> = 6). Torsional buckling initiation tests with <i>n</i> = 4 for the baseline case (<i>L</i> = 7.5 cm) and <i>n</i> = 3 for the validation of ePTFE (<i>L</i> = 15 cm) and Dacron (<i>L</i> = 15 cm and <i>L</i> = 25 cm) for each are also conducted at low venous pressures. A practical predictive formulation for the buckling potential is proposed using experimental observations and available theory. The relationship between the critical buckling rotation angle and the lumen pressure is determined by balancing the circumferential component of the compressive principal stress with the shear stress generated by the modified critical buckling torque, where the modified critical buckling torque depends linearly on the lumen pressure. While the proposed technique successfully predicted the critical rotation angle values lying within two standard deviations of the mean in the baseline case for all four materials at all lumen pressures, it could reliably predict the critical buckling rotation angles for ePTFE and Dacron samples of length 15 cm with maximum relative errors of 31% and 38%, respectively, in the validation phase. However, the validation of the performance of the technique demonstrated lower accuracy for Dacron samples of length 25 cm at higher pressure levels of 12 mmHg and 15 mmHg. Applicable to all surgical materials, this formulation enables surgeons to assess the torsional buckling potential of vascular conduits noninvasively. Bovine pericardium has been found to exhibit the highest stability, while Dacron (the lowest) and porcine pericardium have been identified as the least stable with the (unitless) torsional buckling resistance constants, 43,800, 12,300 and 14,000, respectively. There was no significant difference between ePTFE and Dacron, and between porcine and bovine pericardia. However, both porcine and bovine pericardia were found to be statistically different from ePTFE and Dacron individually (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). ePTFE exhibited highly nonlinear behavior across the entire strain range [0, 0.1] (or 10% elongation). The significant differences among the surgical materials reported here require special care in conduit construction and anastomosis design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"23 3","pages":"845 - 860"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-023-01809-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In complex cardiovascular surgical reconstructions, conduit materials that avoid possible large-scale structural deformations should be considered. A fundamental mode of mechanical complication is torsional buckling which occurs at the anastomosis site due to the mechanical instability, leading surgical conduit/patch surface deformation. The objective of this study is to investigate the torsional buckling behavior of commonly used materials and to develop a practical method for estimating the critical buckling rotation angle under physiological intramural vessel pressures. For this task, mechanical tests of four clinically approved materials, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), Dacron, porcine and bovine pericardia, commonly used in pediatric cardiovascular surgeries, are conducted (n = 6). Torsional buckling initiation tests with n = 4 for the baseline case (L = 7.5 cm) and n = 3 for the validation of ePTFE (L = 15 cm) and Dacron (L = 15 cm and L = 25 cm) for each are also conducted at low venous pressures. A practical predictive formulation for the buckling potential is proposed using experimental observations and available theory. The relationship between the critical buckling rotation angle and the lumen pressure is determined by balancing the circumferential component of the compressive principal stress with the shear stress generated by the modified critical buckling torque, where the modified critical buckling torque depends linearly on the lumen pressure. While the proposed technique successfully predicted the critical rotation angle values lying within two standard deviations of the mean in the baseline case for all four materials at all lumen pressures, it could reliably predict the critical buckling rotation angles for ePTFE and Dacron samples of length 15 cm with maximum relative errors of 31% and 38%, respectively, in the validation phase. However, the validation of the performance of the technique demonstrated lower accuracy for Dacron samples of length 25 cm at higher pressure levels of 12 mmHg and 15 mmHg. Applicable to all surgical materials, this formulation enables surgeons to assess the torsional buckling potential of vascular conduits noninvasively. Bovine pericardium has been found to exhibit the highest stability, while Dacron (the lowest) and porcine pericardium have been identified as the least stable with the (unitless) torsional buckling resistance constants, 43,800, 12,300 and 14,000, respectively. There was no significant difference between ePTFE and Dacron, and between porcine and bovine pericardia. However, both porcine and bovine pericardia were found to be statistically different from ePTFE and Dacron individually (p < 0.0001). ePTFE exhibited highly nonlinear behavior across the entire strain range [0, 0.1] (or 10% elongation). The significant differences among the surgical materials reported here require special care in conduit construction and anastomosis design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科心血管材料的机械特性和扭转屈曲。
在复杂的心血管手术重建中,导管材料应避免可能出现的大规模结构变形。机械并发症的一种基本模式是扭转屈曲,由于机械不稳定性而发生在吻合部位,导致手术导管/补片表面变形。本研究的目的是调查常用材料的扭转屈曲行为,并开发一种实用的方法来估算生理腔内血管压力下的临界屈曲旋转角。为此,我们对四种临床认可的材料进行了机械测试,它们是儿科心血管手术中常用的膨体聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)、达克隆、猪心包和牛心包(n = 6)。此外,还在低静脉压力下进行了扭转屈曲起始试验,基线情况(L = 7.5 厘米)为 n = 4,验证 ePTFE(L = 15 厘米)和 Dacron(L = 15 厘米和 L = 25 厘米)为 n = 3。利用实验观察结果和现有理论,提出了实用的屈曲势能预测公式。临界屈曲旋转角与管腔压力之间的关系是通过平衡压缩主应力的周向分量与修正临界屈曲力矩产生的剪应力来确定的,其中修正临界屈曲力矩与管腔压力成线性关系。虽然所提出的技术成功地预测了所有四种材料在所有管腔压力下的临界旋转角值在基线情况下平均值的两个标准差范围内,但在验证阶段,它可以可靠地预测长度为 15 厘米的 ePTFE 和 Dacron 样品的临界屈曲旋转角,最大相对误差分别为 31% 和 38%。不过,在 12 毫米汞柱和 15 毫米汞柱的较高压力水平下,对长度为 25 厘米的 Dacron 样品进行的性能验证表明,该技术的准确性较低。该配方适用于所有手术材料,使外科医生能够无创评估血管导管的扭转屈曲潜力。研究发现,牛心包的稳定性最高,而达克龙(最低)和猪心包的稳定性最低,其(无单位)扭转屈曲阻力常数分别为 43800、12300 和 14000。ePTFE 和达克龙之间以及猪心包和牛心包之间没有明显差异。然而,猪和牛的心包与 ePTFE 和 Dacron 的心包在统计学上存在差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
期刊最新文献
A review on the mucus dynamics in the human respiratory airway. The mechanical response of polymeric gyroid structures in an optimised orthotic insole. Timing of resting zone parathyroid hormone-related protein expression affects maintenance of the growth plate during secondary ossification: a computational study. A non-intrusive reduced-order model for finite element analysis of implant positioning in total hip replacements. Comparison and identification of human coronary plaques with/without erosion using patient-specific optical coherence tomography-based fluid-structure interaction models: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1