Influence of material parameter variability on the predicted coronary artery biomechanical environment via uncertainty quantification

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1007/s10237-023-01814-2
Caleb C. Berggren, David Jiang, Y. F. Jack Wang, Jake A. Bergquist, Lindsay C. Rupp, Zexin Liu, Rob S. MacLeod, Akil Narayan, Lucas H. Timmins
{"title":"Influence of material parameter variability on the predicted coronary artery biomechanical environment via uncertainty quantification","authors":"Caleb C. Berggren,&nbsp;David Jiang,&nbsp;Y. F. Jack Wang,&nbsp;Jake A. Bergquist,&nbsp;Lindsay C. Rupp,&nbsp;Zexin Liu,&nbsp;Rob S. MacLeod,&nbsp;Akil Narayan,&nbsp;Lucas H. Timmins","doi":"10.1007/s10237-023-01814-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Central to the clinical adoption of patient-specific modeling strategies is demonstrating that simulation results are reliable and safe. Indeed, simulation frameworks must be robust to uncertainty in model input(s), and levels of confidence should accompany results. In this study, we applied a coupled uncertainty quantification–finite element (FE) framework to understand the impact of uncertainty in vascular material properties on variability in predicted stresses. Univariate probability distributions were fit to material parameters derived from layer-specific mechanical behavior testing of human coronary tissue. Parameters were assumed to be probabilistically independent, allowing for efficient parameter ensemble sampling. In an idealized coronary artery geometry, a forward FE model for each parameter ensemble was created to predict tissue stresses under physiologic loading. An emulator was constructed within the UncertainSCI software using polynomial chaos techniques, and statistics and sensitivities were directly computed. Results demonstrated that material parameter uncertainty propagates to variability in predicted stresses across the vessel wall, with the largest dispersions in stress within the adventitial layer. Variability in stress was most sensitive to uncertainties in the anisotropic component of the strain energy function. Moreover, unary and binary interactions within the adventitial layer were the main contributors to stress variance, and the leading factor in stress variability was uncertainty in the stress-like material parameter that describes the contribution of the embedded fibers to the overall artery stiffness. Results from a patient-specific coronary model confirmed many of these findings. Collectively, these data highlight the impact of material property variation on uncertainty in predicted artery stresses and present a pipeline to explore and characterize forward model uncertainty in computational biomechanics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"23 3","pages":"927 - 940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-023-01814-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central to the clinical adoption of patient-specific modeling strategies is demonstrating that simulation results are reliable and safe. Indeed, simulation frameworks must be robust to uncertainty in model input(s), and levels of confidence should accompany results. In this study, we applied a coupled uncertainty quantification–finite element (FE) framework to understand the impact of uncertainty in vascular material properties on variability in predicted stresses. Univariate probability distributions were fit to material parameters derived from layer-specific mechanical behavior testing of human coronary tissue. Parameters were assumed to be probabilistically independent, allowing for efficient parameter ensemble sampling. In an idealized coronary artery geometry, a forward FE model for each parameter ensemble was created to predict tissue stresses under physiologic loading. An emulator was constructed within the UncertainSCI software using polynomial chaos techniques, and statistics and sensitivities were directly computed. Results demonstrated that material parameter uncertainty propagates to variability in predicted stresses across the vessel wall, with the largest dispersions in stress within the adventitial layer. Variability in stress was most sensitive to uncertainties in the anisotropic component of the strain energy function. Moreover, unary and binary interactions within the adventitial layer were the main contributors to stress variance, and the leading factor in stress variability was uncertainty in the stress-like material parameter that describes the contribution of the embedded fibers to the overall artery stiffness. Results from a patient-specific coronary model confirmed many of these findings. Collectively, these data highlight the impact of material property variation on uncertainty in predicted artery stresses and present a pipeline to explore and characterize forward model uncertainty in computational biomechanics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过不确定性量化分析材料参数变化对预测冠状动脉生物力学环境的影响。
临床采用患者特异性建模策略的核心是证明模拟结果是可靠和安全的。事实上,模拟框架必须对模型输入中的不确定性具有稳健性,并且结果应具有可信度。在这项研究中,我们采用了不确定性量化-有限元(FE)耦合框架,以了解血管材料属性的不确定性对预测应力变化的影响。根据人体冠状动脉组织特定层力学行为测试得出的材料参数拟合了单变量概率分布。假设参数在概率上是独立的,因此可以进行有效的参数集合采样。在理想化的冠状动脉几何形状中,为每个参数组合创建了一个前向有限元模型,以预测生理负荷下的组织应力。利用多项式混沌技术在 UncertainSCI 软件中构建了一个仿真器,并直接计算了统计数据和敏感性。结果表明,材料参数的不确定性会导致整个血管壁预测应力的变化,其中临近层的应力分散最大。应力的变化对应变能函数各向异性分量的不确定性最为敏感。此外,临近层内的一元和二元相互作用是造成应力差异的主要因素,而应力差异的主要因素是应力样材料参数的不确定性,该参数描述了嵌入纤维对整个动脉刚度的贡献。患者特异性冠状动脉模型的结果证实了上述许多发现。总之,这些数据强调了材料特性变化对预测动脉应力不确定性的影响,并提供了一个管道来探索和描述计算生物力学中前瞻模型的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
期刊最新文献
A review on the mucus dynamics in the human respiratory airway. The mechanical response of polymeric gyroid structures in an optimised orthotic insole. Timing of resting zone parathyroid hormone-related protein expression affects maintenance of the growth plate during secondary ossification: a computational study. A non-intrusive reduced-order model for finite element analysis of implant positioning in total hip replacements. Comparison and identification of human coronary plaques with/without erosion using patient-specific optical coherence tomography-based fluid-structure interaction models: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1