Mixing studies for lupus anticoagulant: does it matter how we mix?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001288
Vanja Radišić Biljak, Matea Tomas, Ivana Lapić
{"title":"Mixing studies for lupus anticoagulant: does it matter how we mix?","authors":"Vanja Radišić Biljak, Matea Tomas, Ivana Lapić","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although clear and detailed recommendation regarding the lupus anticoagulant mixing test exist, various sources of NPP are used. We decided to inspect the possible differences in mixing studies depending on the mixing media. Four types of mixing media were prepared for 45 random remnant plasma samples: standard human plasma, control plasma N, previously analyzed patient with normal coagulation values, and home-made normal pool plasma (NPP). Samples were analyzed by using Siemens Dade Actin FSL Activated PTT Reagent on BCS XP analyzer. The median aPTT values of mixing studies with commercial lyophilized NPP, with commercial IQC, as well as with a patient did not differ (26.6, 26.3, and 26.8 s, respectively). Median value of a mixing study with home-made NPP was significantly higher from the rest of the group (27.9 s) ( P  < 0.05). According to the obtained results, we decided to employ the commercial lyophilized NPP for future lupus anticoagulant mixing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although clear and detailed recommendation regarding the lupus anticoagulant mixing test exist, various sources of NPP are used. We decided to inspect the possible differences in mixing studies depending on the mixing media. Four types of mixing media were prepared for 45 random remnant plasma samples: standard human plasma, control plasma N, previously analyzed patient with normal coagulation values, and home-made normal pool plasma (NPP). Samples were analyzed by using Siemens Dade Actin FSL Activated PTT Reagent on BCS XP analyzer. The median aPTT values of mixing studies with commercial lyophilized NPP, with commercial IQC, as well as with a patient did not differ (26.6, 26.3, and 26.8 s, respectively). Median value of a mixing study with home-made NPP was significantly higher from the rest of the group (27.9 s) ( P  < 0.05). According to the obtained results, we decided to employ the commercial lyophilized NPP for future lupus anticoagulant mixing studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狼疮抗凝剂的混合研究:如何混合重要吗?
虽然关于狼疮抗凝剂混合试验有明确而详细的建议,但使用的 NPP 来源各不相同。我们决定检查混合研究中混合培养基可能存在的差异。我们为 45 份随机残留血浆样本制备了四种类型的混合培养基:标准人类血浆、对照血浆 N、先前分析过的凝血值正常的患者血浆和自制的正常池血浆(NPP)。在 BCS XP 分析仪上使用西门子 Dade Actin FSL 激活 PTT 试剂对样本进行分析。使用商用冻干 NPP、商用 IQC 和一名患者进行混合研究的 aPTT 中值没有差异(分别为 26.6、26.3 和 26.8 秒)。使用自制 NPP 进行混合研究的中位值(27.9 秒)明显高于其他组别(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
期刊最新文献
Variation among venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools for postcesarean patients: a retrospective cohort study. Is the combination of two automated rapid assays for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia necessary? A novel SERPINC1 c.119G>A (p.Cys40Tyr) mutation with variable clinical expression in an Indian family. A novel γ-chain mutation p.Asp318His in a Chinese family with dysfibrinogenemia. Molecular mechanism analysis of a family with hereditary coagulation FXI deficiency caused by compound heterozygous mutations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1