Dietitians' practices in dialysis units in Brazil: nutritional assessment and intervention.

Fabiana Baggio Nerbass, Aline de Araujo Antunes, Lilian Cuppari
{"title":"Dietitians' practices in dialysis units in Brazil: nutritional assessment and intervention.","authors":"Fabiana Baggio Nerbass, Aline de Araujo Antunes, Lilian Cuppari","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2023-0092en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of dietitians in dialysis units is indisputable and mandatory in Brazil, but little is known about the practices adopted by these professionals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To know practices adopted in routine nutritional care, focusing on nutritional assessment tools and treatment strategies for people at risk or diagnosed with malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Electronic questionnaire disseminated on social media and messaging applications. It included questions that covered dietitians' demographic and occupational profile characteristics and of the dialysis unit, use and frequency of nutritional assessment tools, nutritional intervention strategies in cases of risk or diagnosis of malnutrition, prescription and access to oral supplements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty four percent of the Brazilian dialysis units (n = 207) responded electronically. The most used nutritional assessment tools with or without a pre-established frequency were dietary surveys (96%) and Subjective Global Assessment (83%). The strategies in cases of risk or presence of malnutrition used most frequently (almost always/always) were instructions to increase energy and protein intake from foods (97%), and increasing the frequency of visits (88%). The frequency of prescribing commercial supplements with standard and specialized formulas was quite similar. The availability of dietary supplements by the public healthcare system to patients varied between regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most dietitians use various nutritional assessment tools and intervention strategies in cases of risk or malnutrition; however, the frequency of use of such tools and strategies varied substantially.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2023-0092en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of dietitians in dialysis units is indisputable and mandatory in Brazil, but little is known about the practices adopted by these professionals.

Objective: To know practices adopted in routine nutritional care, focusing on nutritional assessment tools and treatment strategies for people at risk or diagnosed with malnutrition.

Methodology: Electronic questionnaire disseminated on social media and messaging applications. It included questions that covered dietitians' demographic and occupational profile characteristics and of the dialysis unit, use and frequency of nutritional assessment tools, nutritional intervention strategies in cases of risk or diagnosis of malnutrition, prescription and access to oral supplements.

Results: Twenty four percent of the Brazilian dialysis units (n = 207) responded electronically. The most used nutritional assessment tools with or without a pre-established frequency were dietary surveys (96%) and Subjective Global Assessment (83%). The strategies in cases of risk or presence of malnutrition used most frequently (almost always/always) were instructions to increase energy and protein intake from foods (97%), and increasing the frequency of visits (88%). The frequency of prescribing commercial supplements with standard and specialized formulas was quite similar. The availability of dietary supplements by the public healthcare system to patients varied between regions.

Conclusion: Most dietitians use various nutritional assessment tools and intervention strategies in cases of risk or malnutrition; however, the frequency of use of such tools and strategies varied substantially.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西透析室营养师的实践:营养评估和干预。
简介:在巴西,透析室营养师的重要性毋庸置疑,而且是强制性的,但人们对这些专业人员所采取的做法却知之甚少:了解常规营养护理中采用的方法,重点是营养评估工具和针对高危人群或确诊为营养不良人群的治疗策略:通过社交媒体和信息应用程序发布电子问卷。其中的问题包括营养师的人口和职业概况特征、透析单位、营养评估工具的使用情况和频率、有营养不良风险或诊断出营养不良时的营养干预策略、口服营养补充剂的处方和获取途径:24%的巴西透析单位(n = 207)通过电子方式进行了回复。无论是否预先确定频率,使用最多的营养评估工具是膳食调查(96%)和主观全面评估(83%)。在有营养不良风险或存在营养不良的情况下,使用频率最高(几乎总是/总是)的策略是指导患者从食物中增加能量和蛋白质的摄入(97%),以及增加就诊频率(88%)。开具标准配方和专用配方的商业补充剂的频率相当接近。不同地区的公共医疗系统向患者提供膳食补充剂的情况各不相同:大多数营养师在出现营养风险或营养不良的情况下会使用各种营养评估工具和干预策略;但是,使用这些工具和策略的频率存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Growth in children with chronic kidney disease and associated risk factors for short stature. Renal tubular acidosis in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv). Erectile dysfunction among men with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis in a Brazilian Amazon urban setting: an epidemiological study. Prediction of metabolic syndrome and its associated risk factors in patients with chronic kidney disease using machine learning techniques. Skin accumulation of advanced glycation end-products predicts kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the Brazilian Diabetes Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1