Perioperative Vision Loss Following Prone Spine Surgery: A Case-Control Study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2023.12.004
{"title":"Perioperative Vision Loss Following Prone Spine Surgery: A Case-Control Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Perioperative vision loss (POVL) is a rare and devastating complication following prone spine surgery. Due to the rare nature of this complication, there is limited research available about patient and surgical risk factors that increase the risk of POVL. The objective of this study was to investigate associated risk factors for POVL with use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This study used a case-control secondary data analysis methodology that included five cases of POVL and 250 controls from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who all underwent prone spine surgery between 2010 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Each POVL case was matched to 50 randomly selected controls (n = 250) based on type and year of surgery. Demographics and variables of interest were compared among the POVL cases, among POVL cases and the aggregate control group (n = 250), and POVL cases against their matched control group. Univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression were then used to estimate the odds of developing POVL in relation to potential patient and surgical risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>When POVL cases were compared to the 250 control cases using univariate analysis, patients who developed POVL were more likely to have received a blood transfusion within 72 hours of surgery (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). and have longer operative times (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% CI [1.003, 1.017], <em>P</em> = .003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Two surgical risk factors were determined to be statistically significant, including the need for perioperative blood transfusion and prolonged operative time. These findings support previous research on POVL which often identified blood loss and prolonged operative times as surgical risk factors. The narrow patient population used in this project may have limited the ability to perform a more robust study on POVL. Therefore, further research on POVL using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database is strongly encouraged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947223010699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Perioperative vision loss (POVL) is a rare and devastating complication following prone spine surgery. Due to the rare nature of this complication, there is limited research available about patient and surgical risk factors that increase the risk of POVL. The objective of this study was to investigate associated risk factors for POVL with use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Design

This study used a case-control secondary data analysis methodology that included five cases of POVL and 250 controls from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who all underwent prone spine surgery between 2010 and 2020.

Methods

Each POVL case was matched to 50 randomly selected controls (n = 250) based on type and year of surgery. Demographics and variables of interest were compared among the POVL cases, among POVL cases and the aggregate control group (n = 250), and POVL cases against their matched control group. Univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression were then used to estimate the odds of developing POVL in relation to potential patient and surgical risk factors.

Findings

When POVL cases were compared to the 250 control cases using univariate analysis, patients who developed POVL were more likely to have received a blood transfusion within 72 hours of surgery (P < .0001). and have longer operative times (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% CI [1.003, 1.017], P = .003).

Conclusions

Two surgical risk factors were determined to be statistically significant, including the need for perioperative blood transfusion and prolonged operative time. These findings support previous research on POVL which often identified blood loss and prolonged operative times as surgical risk factors. The narrow patient population used in this project may have limited the ability to perform a more robust study on POVL. Therefore, further research on POVL using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database is strongly encouraged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俯卧脊椎手术后围手术期视力丧失:病例对照研究
目的:围手术期视力丧失(POVL)是俯卧脊椎手术后一种罕见的破坏性并发症。由于这种并发症的罕见性,有关增加 POVL 风险的患者和手术风险因素的研究非常有限。本研究旨在利用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库调查 POVL 的相关风险因素:本研究采用病例对照二级数据分析方法,纳入了美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库中的5例POVL病例和250例对照病例,这些病例均在2010年至2020年间接受了俯卧位脊柱手术:根据手术类型和年份,将每个 POVL 病例与随机抽取的 50 个对照组(n = 250)进行匹配。比较了POVL病例之间、POVL病例与总对照组(n = 250)之间以及POVL病例与匹配对照组之间的人口统计学特征和相关变量。然后使用单变量和多变量条件逻辑回归估算与潜在患者和手术风险因素相关的POVL发病几率:通过单变量分析将 POVL 病例与 250 例对照病例进行比较,发现发生 POVL 的患者更有可能在术后 72 小时内接受过输血(P. 结论:POVL 的发生与患者和手术风险因素有关:有两个手术风险因素具有统计学意义,包括围手术期输血需求和手术时间延长。这些研究结果支持之前关于 POVL 的研究,这些研究通常将失血和手术时间延长作为手术风险因素。本项目使用的患者群体较窄,可能限制了对 POVL 进行更深入研究的能力。因此,我们强烈建议使用国家外科质量改进计划数据库对 POVL 进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nursing Consultation Model: A Delphi Study. The Use of Prophylactic Ketamine to Mitigate Postoperative Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Cover 1 Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1