Heat Tolerance Testing and the Return to Duty Decision: A Two-Year Case Cohort Analysis.

Rachel M Kester, Preetha A Abraham, Jeffrey C Leggit, Jacob B Harp, Josh B Kazman, Patricia A Deuster, Francis G O'Connor
{"title":"Heat Tolerance Testing and the Return to Duty Decision: A Two-Year Case Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Rachel M Kester, Preetha A Abraham, Jeffrey C Leggit, Jacob B Harp, Josh B Kazman, Patricia A Deuster, Francis G O'Connor","doi":"10.55460/W7TV-MBRZ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among individuals with prior exertional heat illness (EHI), heat tolerance testing (HTT) may inform risk and return to duty/activity. However, little is known about HTT's predictive validity, particularly for EHI recurrence. Our project sought to demonstrate the predictive validity of HTT in EHI recurrence and HTT's utility as a diagnostic tool in exertional heat stroke (EHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with prior EHS were recruited for the study by a physician's referral and were classified as heat tolerant or intolerant after completing demographics and an HTT. Participants were further categorized as single/simple (SS) EHI or recurrent/complex (RC) EHI by conducting a retrospective record review of the following two years. We calculated the positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of HTT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retrospective review of HTT records was used to categorize 44% of Servicemembers as RC, with 77% classified as heat tolerant, 14% as heat intolerant, and 9% as borderline. When borderline cases were classified as heat intolerant, HTT had a high NPV, indicating a high probability that heat-tolerant individuals did not have recurrent EHI. When borderline cases were classified as heat tolerant, NPV and sensitivity decreased while specificity increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that the HTT had a 100% NPV for future EHI over two years of follow-up for Servicemembers with a history of recurrent heat injury and negative HTT results. An HTT can provide critical data points to inform return to duty decisions and timelines by predicting the risk of EHI recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/W7TV-MBRZ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among individuals with prior exertional heat illness (EHI), heat tolerance testing (HTT) may inform risk and return to duty/activity. However, little is known about HTT's predictive validity, particularly for EHI recurrence. Our project sought to demonstrate the predictive validity of HTT in EHI recurrence and HTT's utility as a diagnostic tool in exertional heat stroke (EHS).

Methods: Participants with prior EHS were recruited for the study by a physician's referral and were classified as heat tolerant or intolerant after completing demographics and an HTT. Participants were further categorized as single/simple (SS) EHI or recurrent/complex (RC) EHI by conducting a retrospective record review of the following two years. We calculated the positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of HTT.

Results: The retrospective review of HTT records was used to categorize 44% of Servicemembers as RC, with 77% classified as heat tolerant, 14% as heat intolerant, and 9% as borderline. When borderline cases were classified as heat intolerant, HTT had a high NPV, indicating a high probability that heat-tolerant individuals did not have recurrent EHI. When borderline cases were classified as heat tolerant, NPV and sensitivity decreased while specificity increased.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that the HTT had a 100% NPV for future EHI over two years of follow-up for Servicemembers with a history of recurrent heat injury and negative HTT results. An HTT can provide critical data points to inform return to duty decisions and timelines by predicting the risk of EHI recurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐热测试与重返工作岗位的决定:为期两年的病例队列分析。
背景:对于曾经患过劳累性热病(EHI)的人,热耐受测试(HTT)可为风险和重返岗位/活动提供参考。然而,人们对耐热试验的预测效力知之甚少,尤其是对高温热病复发的预测效力。我们的项目旨在证明耐热试验对中暑复发的预测有效性,以及耐热试验作为劳累性中暑(EHS)诊断工具的实用性:方法: 通过医生转介,招募曾有过中暑经历的参与者参与研究,并在完成人口统计学和 HTT 后将其分为耐热和不耐热两类。通过对随后两年的记录进行回顾性审查,进一步将参与者分为单次/简单(SS)EHI 或复发/复杂(RC)EHI。我们计算了 HTT 的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV):通过对 HTT 记录的回顾性审查,我们将 44% 的军人归类为 RC,其中 77% 被归类为耐热,14% 被归类为不耐热,9% 被归类为边缘病例。当边缘病例被归类为不耐热者时,HTT 的 NPV 很高,表明耐热者很有可能没有复发性 EHI。当边缘病例被归类为耐热病例时,NPV 和灵敏度下降,而特异性上升:我们证明,在对有复发性热损伤病史且 HTT 结果为阴性的军人进行两年随访后,HTT 对未来 EHI 的 NPV 值为 100%。高温热损伤测试可提供重要的数据点,通过预测高温热损伤复发的风险,为重返岗位的决策和时间安排提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage. Chronicity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of Special Operators and Conventional Forces. On Saving - The Psychosocial Benefit of Saving Lives in War and Society. Rethinking the Operational Blood Bank Dilemma: Out of the "Box" Blood Storage and Transportation Evaluation. Special Forces Medics Ability to Identify Wooden Foreign Bodies by Point-of-Care Ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1