Comparison of Health Status and Life Satisfaction According to Food Security in Single-Person Households of Elderly Population.

Clinical nutrition research Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7762/cnr.2024.13.1.42
Dong Hoon Jung, Jae Won Han, Wonha Kim, Hee-Sook Lim
{"title":"Comparison of Health Status and Life Satisfaction According to Food Security in Single-Person Households of Elderly Population.","authors":"Dong Hoon Jung, Jae Won Han, Wonha Kim, Hee-Sook Lim","doi":"10.7762/cnr.2024.13.1.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed the 2019 Community Health Survey data to compare and analyze the health levels and life satisfaction of single-person elderly households based on food security. The final study subjects were 15,606 single-person elderly individuals aged 65 and above. These subjects were classified based on their response to food security into three groups: food sufficient-diverse, food sufficient-not diverse, and food insufficient. The study results showed that the proportion of the food insufficient group among single-person elderly households was 7.4% for men and 10.6% for women, with a slightly higher rate for female elderly. Both male and female elderly over 80 years of age, with low education levels, and basic living support recipients showed significantly higher proportions in the sufficient-not diverse and food insufficient groups. For male elderly, significant differences were observed in subjective health status and oral health level in the food insufficient group, and for female elderly, stress levels also showed significant differences. Life satisfaction scores were generally lower for female elderly compared to male, and significant differences were found in both male and female elderly based on food security. Common factors that significantly influence life satisfaction among single-person elderly households, both male and female, include food security, subjective health status, and living environment satisfaction, with food security being the most impactful factor. The study suggests that it is necessary to include these significant factors in the development of various social activity programs, such as dietary programs, to enhance life satisfaction and food security of single-person elderly households.</p>","PeriodicalId":72617,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition research","volume":"13 1","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10866680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2024.13.1.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed the 2019 Community Health Survey data to compare and analyze the health levels and life satisfaction of single-person elderly households based on food security. The final study subjects were 15,606 single-person elderly individuals aged 65 and above. These subjects were classified based on their response to food security into three groups: food sufficient-diverse, food sufficient-not diverse, and food insufficient. The study results showed that the proportion of the food insufficient group among single-person elderly households was 7.4% for men and 10.6% for women, with a slightly higher rate for female elderly. Both male and female elderly over 80 years of age, with low education levels, and basic living support recipients showed significantly higher proportions in the sufficient-not diverse and food insufficient groups. For male elderly, significant differences were observed in subjective health status and oral health level in the food insufficient group, and for female elderly, stress levels also showed significant differences. Life satisfaction scores were generally lower for female elderly compared to male, and significant differences were found in both male and female elderly based on food security. Common factors that significantly influence life satisfaction among single-person elderly households, both male and female, include food security, subjective health status, and living environment satisfaction, with food security being the most impactful factor. The study suggests that it is necessary to include these significant factors in the development of various social activity programs, such as dietary programs, to enhance life satisfaction and food security of single-person elderly households.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人单人家庭的健康状况和生活满意度与食品安全的比较。
本研究分析了2019年社区健康调查数据,比较和分析了基于食品安全的独居老人家庭的健康水平和生活满意度。最终研究对象为 15606 名 65 岁及以上的单人老年人。这些受试者根据其对食物安全的反应被分为三组:食物充足-多样化、食物充足-不多样化和食物不足。研究结果显示,在单人长者家庭中,食物不足组的比例男性为 7.4%,女性为 10.6%,女性长者的比例略高。80 岁以上的男性和女性老年人、教育水平较低的老年人以及基本生活补助领取者在食物充足而不多样化和食物不足群体中的比例都明显较高。在食物不足组中,男性老年人的主观健康状况和口腔健康水平存在显著差异,女性老年人的压力水平也存在显著差异。与男性相比,女性老年人的生活满意度得分普遍较低,而男性和女性老年人在食品安全方面均存在显著差异。显著影响单人老年家庭(包括男性和女性)生活满意度的共同因素包括食品安全、主观健康状况和生活环境满意度,其中食品安全是影响最大的因素。研究表明,在制定各种社会活动计划(如膳食计划)时,有必要将这些重要因素纳入其中,以提高独居老人家庭的生活满意度和食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcium Intake and the Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. 5A's Behavior Change Model Improves Nutrition Knowledge and Intake Among Adolescent Athletes. Continuous Postpandemic Increase in the Use of Nutrition Fact Labels Among Korean Adults: A Weighted Multiyear Analysis of a Nationwide Survey. Flaxseed Lowers Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Subjects: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Korean Food Exchange Lists for Diabetes Meal Planning: Revised 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1