The Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54
Seunghee Na, Dong Woo Kang, Geon Ha Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Kee Hyung Park, Young Ho Park, Gihwan Byeon, Jeewon Suh, Joon Hyun Shin, YongSoo Shim, YoungSoon Yang, Yoo Hyun Um, Seong-Il Oh, Sheng-Min Wang, Bora Yoon, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Sun Min Lee, Juyoun Lee, Jin San Lee, Hak Young Rhee, Jae-Sung Lim, Young Hee Jung, Juhee Chin, Yun Jeong Hong, Hyemin Jang, Hongyoon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Jae-Won Jang
{"title":"The Usefulness of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Seunghee Na, Dong Woo Kang, Geon Ha Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Kee Hyung Park, Young Ho Park, Gihwan Byeon, Jeewon Suh, Joon Hyun Shin, YongSoo Shim, YoungSoon Yang, Yoo Hyun Um, Seong-Il Oh, Sheng-Min Wang, Bora Yoon, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Sun Min Lee, Juyoun Lee, Jin San Lee, Hak Young Rhee, Jae-Sung Lim, Young Hee Jung, Juhee Chin, Yun Jeong Hong, Hyemin Jang, Hongyoon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Jae-Won Jang","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management.

Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes.

Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments.

Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18F-FDG PET 在区分痴呆症亚型方面的用途:系统综述与元分析》。
背景和目的:包括阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆(AD)、路易体痴呆(DLB)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)在内的痴呆亚型给诊断带来了挑战。本综述探讨了 18F-FDG 正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDG PET)在区分这些亚型以进行精确治疗和管理方面的有效性:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,利用 PubMed 和 Embase 等数据库进行了系统综述,以确定有关 18F-FDG PET 在痴呆症诊断中的效用的研究。检索包括截至2022年11月16日的研究,重点关注同行评审期刊,并采用痴呆亚型的金标准临床诊断:结果:从12815篇文章中筛选出14篇进行最终分析。AD相对于FTD的敏感性为0.96(95%置信区间[CI],0.88-0.98),特异性为0.84(95%置信区间,0.70-0.92)。在AD与DLB的比较中,18F-FDG PET的灵敏度为0.93(95% CI为0.88-0.98),特异性为0.92(95% CI为0.70-0.92)。最后,在区分AD和非AD痴呆症时,灵敏度为0.86(95% CI,0.80-0.91),特异性为0.88(95% CI,0.80-0.91)。这些研究大多采用病例对照设计,并进行了视觉和定量评估:结论:18F-FDG PET 在区分痴呆亚型,尤其是 AD、FTD 和 DLB 方面具有很高的灵敏度和特异性。这种方法虽然不是独立的诊断工具,但能显著提高不确定病例的诊断准确性,是对临床评估和结构成像的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE. Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses. Discriminative Power of Seoul Cognitive Status Test in Differentiating Subjective Cognitive Decline, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia Based on CERAD-K Standards. Shunt-Responsive Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patient With Parkinson's Disease-Compatible Findings on Dopamine Transporter Scans. Speech Emotion Recognition in People at High Risk of Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1