Pigs in Transplantation Research and Their Potential as Sources of Organs in Clinical Xenotransplantation.

Comparative medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000030
S Sikandar Raza, Hidetaka Hara, Willard Eyestone, David Ayares, David C Cleveland, David K C Cooper
{"title":"Pigs in Transplantation Research and Their Potential as Sources of Organs in Clinical Xenotransplantation.","authors":"S Sikandar Raza, Hidetaka Hara, Willard Eyestone, David Ayares, David C Cleveland, David K C Cooper","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pig has long been used as a research animal and has now gained importance as a potential source of organs for clinical xenotransplantation. When an organ from a wild-type (i. e., genetically unmodified) pig is transplanted into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate, a vigorous host immune response causes hyperacute rejection (within minutes or hours). This response has been largely overcome by 1) extensive gene editing of the organ-source pig and 2) the administration to the recipient of novel immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 T cell costimulation pathway. Gene editing has consisted of 1) deletion of expression of the 3 known carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have natural (preformed) antibodies and 2) the introduction of human 'protective' genes. The combination of gene editing and novel immunosuppressive therapy has extended life-supporting pig kidney graft survival to greater than 1 y and of pig heart survival to up to 9 mo. This review briefly describes the techniques of gene editing, the potential risks of transfer of porcine endogenous retroviruses with the organ, and the need for breeding and housing of donor pigs under biosecure conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93950,"journal":{"name":"Comparative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"33-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pig has long been used as a research animal and has now gained importance as a potential source of organs for clinical xenotransplantation. When an organ from a wild-type (i. e., genetically unmodified) pig is transplanted into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate, a vigorous host immune response causes hyperacute rejection (within minutes or hours). This response has been largely overcome by 1) extensive gene editing of the organ-source pig and 2) the administration to the recipient of novel immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 T cell costimulation pathway. Gene editing has consisted of 1) deletion of expression of the 3 known carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have natural (preformed) antibodies and 2) the introduction of human 'protective' genes. The combination of gene editing and novel immunosuppressive therapy has extended life-supporting pig kidney graft survival to greater than 1 y and of pig heart survival to up to 9 mo. This review briefly describes the techniques of gene editing, the potential risks of transfer of porcine endogenous retroviruses with the organ, and the need for breeding and housing of donor pigs under biosecure conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移植研究中的猪及其作为临床异种移植器官来源的潜力。
长期以来,猪一直被用作研究动物,现在作为临床异种移植的潜在器官来源,其重要性日益凸显。当来自野生型猪(即基因未修改的猪)的器官移植到免疫抑制的非人灵长类动物体内时,强烈的宿主免疫反应会导致超急性排斥反应(数分钟或数小时内)。这种反应在很大程度上是通过以下方法克服的:1)对器官来源猪进行广泛的基因编辑;2)向受体施用基于阻断 CD40/CD154 T 细胞成本刺激途径的新型免疫抑制疗法。基因编辑包括:1)删除人类具有天然(预形成)抗体的 3 种已知碳水化合物异抗原的表达;2)引入人类 "保护 "基因。基因编辑与新型免疫抑制疗法相结合,已将维持生命的猪肾脏移植存活期延长至 1 年以上,猪心脏存活期延长至 9 个月。 本综述简要介绍了基因编辑技术、猪内源性逆转录病毒随器官转移的潜在风险,以及在生物安全条件下繁殖和饲养供体猪的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AALAS Journal Updates for Authors. Chlamydia muridarum Causes Persistent Subclinical Infection and Elicits Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, and J:ARC(S) Mice Following Exposure to Shedding Mice. The Final Scene. Investigating the Effect of Enterally Administered Capromorelin on Body Weight in Mice (Mus musculus). Comparison of Terminal Elbow Extension between Humans and Baboons (Papio anubis).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1