Exploring the effects of task difficulty and learner variables on performance on picture description writing tasks

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100827
Khaled Barkaoui
{"title":"Exploring the effects of task difficulty and learner variables on performance on picture description writing tasks","authors":"Khaled Barkaoui","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Picture description (PD) tasks are widely used in second language (L2) teaching, research, and assessment to elicit and/or evaluate L2 learners’ writing performance. However, there is little research on the effects of the characteristics of such tasks on L2 writing performance. This study aimed to examine the effects of task difficulty and learner variables on the linguistic characteristics of responses to the 2020 version of the Duolingo English Test (DET) PD writing tasks. The written responses of 1439 test takers from four first language (L1) backgrounds and at different levels of L2 proficiency to 335 DET PD tasks at two levels of difficulty were analyzed and compared in terms of measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity using various computer programs. The findings indicated that task difficulty did not affect writing performance significantly; high-proficiency learners tended to perform better than did their low-proficiency counterparts; responses receiving higher scores tended to be longer and more accurate; and learner L1 was significantly associated with writing grades and linguistic features. The findings and their implications for the DET PD task and the DET validity argument are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 100827"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Picture description (PD) tasks are widely used in second language (L2) teaching, research, and assessment to elicit and/or evaluate L2 learners’ writing performance. However, there is little research on the effects of the characteristics of such tasks on L2 writing performance. This study aimed to examine the effects of task difficulty and learner variables on the linguistic characteristics of responses to the 2020 version of the Duolingo English Test (DET) PD writing tasks. The written responses of 1439 test takers from four first language (L1) backgrounds and at different levels of L2 proficiency to 335 DET PD tasks at two levels of difficulty were analyzed and compared in terms of measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity using various computer programs. The findings indicated that task difficulty did not affect writing performance significantly; high-proficiency learners tended to perform better than did their low-proficiency counterparts; responses receiving higher scores tended to be longer and more accurate; and learner L1 was significantly associated with writing grades and linguistic features. The findings and their implications for the DET PD task and the DET validity argument are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索任务难度和学习者变量对图片描述写作任务成绩的影响
图片描述(PD)任务被广泛应用于第二语言(L2)教学、研究和评估中,以激发和/或评估 L2 学习者的写作表现。然而,有关此类任务的特点对第二语言写作成绩的影响的研究却很少。本研究旨在考察任务难度和学习者变量对2020年版Duolingo英语测试(DET)PD写作任务回答的语言特点的影响。研究使用不同的计算机程序,对来自四种第一语言(L1)背景和不同第二语言水平的1439名应试者对335个两种难度的DET PD任务的书面回答进行了分析,并从流畅性、准确性和复杂性等方面进行了比较。研究结果表明,任务难度对写作成绩的影响不大;高水平的学习者往往比低水平的学习者表现得更好;得分较高的回答往往更长、更准确;学习者的 L1 与写作成绩和语言特点有很大关系。本文讨论了研究结果及其对 DET PD 任务和 DET 有效性论证的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1