AmpFire HPV and ScreenFire RS HPV validation trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY American journal of clinical pathology Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqad181
Jun Hou, Jerome L Belinson, Hui Du, Changzhong Li, Wei Zhang, Lijie Zhang, Yi Zhang, Xinfeng Qu, Ruifang Wu
{"title":"AmpFire HPV and ScreenFire RS HPV validation trial.","authors":"Jun Hou, Jerome L Belinson, Hui Du, Changzhong Li, Wei Zhang, Lijie Zhang, Yi Zhang, Xinfeng Qu, Ruifang Wu","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqad181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The human papillomavirus (HPV) screening assays from Atila Biosystems, including the new AmpFire (14 type) and ScreenFire RS (13 type), were subjected to a series of validation tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a set of samples from the Chinese Multi-Site Screening Trial (previously tested with cobas 4800 and the next-generation SeqHPV) to satisfy Meijer's criteria for clinical end-point validation. We selected 556 self-collected specimens composed of 273 high-risk HPV (hrHPV) positives and 283 hrHPV negatives on the cobas 4800 and SeqHPV. Of the 273 hrHPV-positive cases, 108 had a disease end point of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or higher, including 47 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) or higher. We simulated the VALGENT framework for inter- and intralaboratory validation and evaluated the new 4-channel risk-stratified ScreenFire assay in a hierarchal fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both AmpFire and ScreenFire detected 106 (98.1%) of 108 cases with CIN2 or higher, with specificities of 56.7% and 58.1%, respectively. Intralaboratory concordance for 2 runs of AmpFire and ScreenFire was 95.13% and 96.03%, respectively, for overall hrHPV types and 99.10% and 99.46%, respectively, for HPV 16. The interlaboratory concordance of AmpFire and ScreenFire was 93.68% and 94.04% for overall hrHPV and 98.92% and 99.28%, respectively, for HPV 16. Other genotype correlation percentages were similarly high, with κs ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. The ScreenFire RS assay demonstrated excellent \"genotype-specific concordance\" when evaluated for \"clinical guidance\" in a hierarchal fashion (noting only the highest risk channel) with both the cobas 4800 and SeqHPV for less than CIN2, CIN2, and CIN3 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excellent intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility and the established clinical performance, together with the platforms' simplicity, make these assays particularly applicable to low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The human papillomavirus (HPV) screening assays from Atila Biosystems, including the new AmpFire (14 type) and ScreenFire RS (13 type), were subjected to a series of validation tests.

Methods: We used a set of samples from the Chinese Multi-Site Screening Trial (previously tested with cobas 4800 and the next-generation SeqHPV) to satisfy Meijer's criteria for clinical end-point validation. We selected 556 self-collected specimens composed of 273 high-risk HPV (hrHPV) positives and 283 hrHPV negatives on the cobas 4800 and SeqHPV. Of the 273 hrHPV-positive cases, 108 had a disease end point of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or higher, including 47 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) or higher. We simulated the VALGENT framework for inter- and intralaboratory validation and evaluated the new 4-channel risk-stratified ScreenFire assay in a hierarchal fashion.

Results: Both AmpFire and ScreenFire detected 106 (98.1%) of 108 cases with CIN2 or higher, with specificities of 56.7% and 58.1%, respectively. Intralaboratory concordance for 2 runs of AmpFire and ScreenFire was 95.13% and 96.03%, respectively, for overall hrHPV types and 99.10% and 99.46%, respectively, for HPV 16. The interlaboratory concordance of AmpFire and ScreenFire was 93.68% and 94.04% for overall hrHPV and 98.92% and 99.28%, respectively, for HPV 16. Other genotype correlation percentages were similarly high, with κs ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. The ScreenFire RS assay demonstrated excellent "genotype-specific concordance" when evaluated for "clinical guidance" in a hierarchal fashion (noting only the highest risk channel) with both the cobas 4800 and SeqHPV for less than CIN2, CIN2, and CIN3 or higher.

Conclusions: The excellent intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility and the established clinical performance, together with the platforms' simplicity, make these assays particularly applicable to low-resource settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AmpFire HPV 和 ScreenFire RS HPV 验证试验。
目的:对阿蒂拉生物系统公司生产的人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查试剂盒(包括新型AmpFire(14型)和ScreenFire RS(13型))进行一系列验证试验:我们使用了一组来自中国多点筛查试验的样本(之前使用 cobas 4800 和新一代 SeqHPV 进行过测试),以满足 Meijer 的临床终点验证标准。我们选择了 556 份自取标本,其中包括 273 份经 cobas 4800 和 SeqHPV 检测的高危人乳头瘤病毒 (hrHPV) 阳性标本和 283 份 hrHPV 阴性标本。在 273 例 hrHPV 阳性病例中,108 例的疾病终点为宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级(CIN2)或以上,其中 47 例为宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级(CIN3+)或以上。我们模拟了用于实验室间和实验室内验证的 VALGENT 框架,并对新型 4 通道风险分级 ScreenFire 检测进行了分级评估:结果:AmpFire 和 ScreenFire 检测出 108 例 CIN2 或以上病例中的 106 例(98.1%),特异性分别为 56.7% 和 58.1%。两次 AmpFire 和 ScreenFire 检测的实验室间一致性分别为:hrHPV 全部类型为 95.13% 和 96.03%,HPV 16 为 99.10% 和 99.46%。对于整体 hrHPV,AmpFire 和 ScreenFire 的实验室间一致性分别为 93.68% 和 94.04%,对于 HPV 16,分别为 98.92% 和 99.28%。其他基因型的相关性也同样很高,κs 在 0.86 到 0.94 之间。ScreenFire RS 检测与 cobas 4800 和 SeqHPV 对 CIN2 以下、CIN2 和 CIN3 或更高的 "临床指导 "进行分级评估时(只注意最高风险通道),表现出极好的 "基因型特异性一致性":实验室内和实验室间极好的重现性、成熟的临床表现以及平台的简易性使这些检测方法特别适用于资源匮乏的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
期刊最新文献
Culture and other direct detection methods to diagnose human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Validation of monocyte CD169 expression as a valuable rapid diagnostic marker of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral infections. Site-discordant expression of myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Epstein-Barr virus–positive, primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, with transformation: Case report and review of the literature RhD-positive red blood cell allocation practice to RhD-negative patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1