Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Avalanche Victims with a Single Rescuer: A Prospective, Crossover, Manikin Pilot Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS High altitude medicine & biology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1089/ham.2023.0058
Shota Tanaka, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Hideharu Tanaka
{"title":"Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Avalanche Victims with a Single Rescuer: A Prospective, Crossover, Manikin Pilot Study.","authors":"Shota Tanaka, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Hideharu Tanaka","doi":"10.1089/ham.2023.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tanaka, Shota, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, and Hideharu Tanaka. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in avalanche victims with a single rescuer: a prospective, crossover, manikin pilot study. <i>High Alt Med Biol</i>. 25:60-67, 2024. <b><i>Background:</i></b> Winter outdoor recreational activities such as off-piste skiing have gained popularity and, as a result, the number of avalanche-related deaths has increased. However, the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at avalanche sites remains unclear. Our study compared the quality of CPR performed in a simulated avalanche burial on a snowy mountain with that performed indoors. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ten prehospital health care providers participated in the crossover pilot study. Various methods, including over-the-head CPR (OTH-CPR) and standard CPR, were used to perform avalanche resuscitation, with five rescue breaths, followed by 30 chest compressions and two breaths. The quality CPR was judged by four variables of chest compression and ventilation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The OTH-CPR performed indoors was better in quality: 5.33% [95% confidence interval (CI) -14.2 to 3.5] higher in adequate compression depth (94.3 ± 10.6% on the snow vs. 99.3 ± 1.1% indoors), 3.4% [95% CI -16.1 to 22.9] higher in adequate compression rate (70.4 ± 38.0% vs. 76.1 ± 35.7%), and 2.3% [95% CI -6.4 to 1.72] higher in adequate recoil (96.9 ± 4.8% vs. 99.2 ± 1.6%) than OTH-CPR on the snow. In terms of ventilation quality, OTH-CPR performed indoors had a 50% higher ventilation score [95% CI -73.0 to -27.0] than OTH-CPR on the snow (1.4 ± 4.3% vs. 45.9 ± 32.6%, Cohen's <i>d</i> = -1.81). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Chest compression quality was slightly impaired in the avalanche scenarios on the snow than in indoor settings. Asphyxiation is the main cause of avalanche-related deaths; however, low ventilation quality was observed on snow compared with the indoor setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12975,"journal":{"name":"High altitude medicine & biology","volume":" ","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High altitude medicine & biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2023.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tanaka, Shota, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, and Hideharu Tanaka. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in avalanche victims with a single rescuer: a prospective, crossover, manikin pilot study. High Alt Med Biol. 25:60-67, 2024. Background: Winter outdoor recreational activities such as off-piste skiing have gained popularity and, as a result, the number of avalanche-related deaths has increased. However, the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at avalanche sites remains unclear. Our study compared the quality of CPR performed in a simulated avalanche burial on a snowy mountain with that performed indoors. Methods: Ten prehospital health care providers participated in the crossover pilot study. Various methods, including over-the-head CPR (OTH-CPR) and standard CPR, were used to perform avalanche resuscitation, with five rescue breaths, followed by 30 chest compressions and two breaths. The quality CPR was judged by four variables of chest compression and ventilation. Results: The OTH-CPR performed indoors was better in quality: 5.33% [95% confidence interval (CI) -14.2 to 3.5] higher in adequate compression depth (94.3 ± 10.6% on the snow vs. 99.3 ± 1.1% indoors), 3.4% [95% CI -16.1 to 22.9] higher in adequate compression rate (70.4 ± 38.0% vs. 76.1 ± 35.7%), and 2.3% [95% CI -6.4 to 1.72] higher in adequate recoil (96.9 ± 4.8% vs. 99.2 ± 1.6%) than OTH-CPR on the snow. In terms of ventilation quality, OTH-CPR performed indoors had a 50% higher ventilation score [95% CI -73.0 to -27.0] than OTH-CPR on the snow (1.4 ± 4.3% vs. 45.9 ± 32.6%, Cohen's d = -1.81). Conclusions: Chest compression quality was slightly impaired in the avalanche scenarios on the snow than in indoor settings. Asphyxiation is the main cause of avalanche-related deaths; however, low ventilation quality was observed on snow compared with the indoor setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单人救援雪崩伤员的心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性、交叉、人体模型试点研究。
Tanaka, Shota, Koshi Nakagawa, Yosuke Kanagawa, Takashi Katsurahara, Kazuki Kozakai, Ken Tsuhako, Fumitaka Yoshikawa, Soh Gotoh, Kensuke Osanai, Madoka Sono, Hironori Inoue, Shuji Sakanashi, Hiroyuki Takahashi, and Hideharu Tanaka.单人救援雪崩伤员的心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性、交叉、人体模型试验研究。00:000-000, 2024.背景:越野滑雪等冬季户外娱乐活动越来越受欢迎,因此与雪崩相关的死亡人数也随之增加。然而,雪崩现场心肺复苏(CPR)的质量仍不清楚。我们的研究比较了在雪山模拟雪崩掩埋地和室内进行心肺复苏术的质量。研究方法十名院前医疗服务提供者参加了交叉试验研究。在雪崩急救过程中,采用了各种方法,包括俯卧位心肺复苏术(OTH-CPR)和标准心肺复苏术,先进行五次人工呼吸,然后进行 30 次胸外按压和两次人工呼吸。心肺复苏的质量由胸外按压和通气的四个变量来评判。结果显示在室内进行的 OTH-CPR 质量更高:在足够的按压深度方面高出 5.33% [95% 置信区间 (CI) -14.2 至 3.5](雪地上为 94.3 ± 10.6%,室内为 99.3 ± 1.1%),在按压深度方面高出 3.4% [95% CI -16.1 到 22.9],适当的压缩率(70.4 ± 38.0% 对 76.1 ± 35.7%)比雪地上的 OTH-CPR 高 2.3% [95% CI -6.4 到 1.72],适当的后坐力(96.9 ± 4.8% 对 99.2 ± 1.6%)比室内的 OTH-CPR 高 2.3%[95% CI -6.4 到 1.72]。在通气质量方面,在室内进行的 OTH-CPR 比在雪地上进行的 OTH-CPR 的通气评分高 50%[95%CI-73.0 至 -27.0](1.4 ± 4.3% vs. 45.9 ± 32.6%,Cohen's d =-1.81)。结论:雪地雪崩情况下的胸外按压质量略低于室内环境下的胸外按压质量。窒息是雪崩相关死亡的主要原因;然而,与室内环境相比,雪地上的通气质量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
High altitude medicine & biology
High altitude medicine & biology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: High Altitude Medicine & Biology is the only peer-reviewed journal covering the medical and biological issues that impact human life at high altitudes. The Journal delivers critical findings on the impact of high altitude on lung and heart disease, appetite and weight loss, pulmonary and cerebral edema, hypertension, dehydration, infertility, and other diseases. It covers the full spectrum of high altitude life sciences from pathology to human and animal ecology.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of High Altitude on Children's Sleep: A Community-Based Study on Preschoolers in the Tibetan Plateau. Post-Exercise Hypotension after Exercising in Hypoxia with and Without Tart Cherry Supplementation. Letter to the Editor: Solastalgia and Serendipity-at Altitude and in Academia. The Environmental Impact of a High-Altitude Medical Research Expedition. Altitude and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) in China: A Population-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1