Validation of rapid detection methods for Salmonella enterica in green chile.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Letters in Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/lambio/ovae011
Raghda Kailany, Yatziri Presmont, Ruben Zapata, James Owusu-Kwarteng, Willis Fedio
{"title":"Validation of rapid detection methods for Salmonella enterica in green chile.","authors":"Raghda Kailany, Yatziri Presmont, Ruben Zapata, James Owusu-Kwarteng, Willis Fedio","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to validate the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rea-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, the Neogen Amplified Nucleic Single Temperature Reaction (ANSR) assay, and the Vitek ImmunoDiagnostic Assay System (VIDAS) SLM procedure against the FDA cultural procedure for Salmonella detection in green chile pepper. Green chile was artificially contaminated with Salmonella according to the FDA guidelines (FDA. Guidelines for the Validation of Microbiological Methods for the FDA Foods Program, 3rd Edition. 2019. www.fda.gov/media/83812/download?attachment (17 March 2024, date last accessed)) at a fractional recovery level (where 50%-25% tests positive and at a level +1 log greater for each organism tested). Enriched samples were tested directly by the ANSR Salmonella test and by qPCR, and were subcultured into Rappaport-Vassiliadis and tetrathionate brilliant green broth for cultural detection and qPCR. For the VIDAS-SLM assay, the selective enrichments were further cultured in M broth before testing. Presumptive salmonellae were confirmed with biochemical tests, serology, and qPCR. All three rapid assays were compared favorably with the FDA-BAM (Bacteriological Analytical Manual) method. No significant differences at P < .05 were found between the procedures using McNemar's χ2 test. The three procedures were found to be rapid and reliable alternatives to cultural detection of Salmonella enterica in green chile.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to validate the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rea-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, the Neogen Amplified Nucleic Single Temperature Reaction (ANSR) assay, and the Vitek ImmunoDiagnostic Assay System (VIDAS) SLM procedure against the FDA cultural procedure for Salmonella detection in green chile pepper. Green chile was artificially contaminated with Salmonella according to the FDA guidelines (FDA. Guidelines for the Validation of Microbiological Methods for the FDA Foods Program, 3rd Edition. 2019. www.fda.gov/media/83812/download?attachment (17 March 2024, date last accessed)) at a fractional recovery level (where 50%-25% tests positive and at a level +1 log greater for each organism tested). Enriched samples were tested directly by the ANSR Salmonella test and by qPCR, and were subcultured into Rappaport-Vassiliadis and tetrathionate brilliant green broth for cultural detection and qPCR. For the VIDAS-SLM assay, the selective enrichments were further cultured in M broth before testing. Presumptive salmonellae were confirmed with biochemical tests, serology, and qPCR. All three rapid assays were compared favorably with the FDA-BAM (Bacteriological Analytical Manual) method. No significant differences at P < .05 were found between the procedures using McNemar's χ2 test. The three procedures were found to be rapid and reliable alternatives to cultural detection of Salmonella enterica in green chile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证绿色智利中肠炎沙门氏菌的快速检测方法。
本研究的目的是验证 FDA qPCR 检测法、Neogen 扩增核酸单温反应检测法和 VIDAS SLM 程序与 FDA 文化程序在青辣椒中的沙门氏菌检测效果。根据 FDA 指南(FDA,2019 年),在部分回收水平(50%-25% 的检测结果呈阳性,且每种检测生物体的水平+1 log 以上)下,人为地用沙门氏菌污染青辣椒。富集样品直接通过 ANSR 沙门氏菌检测法和 qPCR 进行检测,富集样品经亚培养后加入 Rappaport-Vassiliadis 和四硫酸盐亮绿肉汤中,用于培养检测。在进行 VIDAS-SLM 检测和 qPCR 时,选择性富集的样本会在 M 肉汤中进一步培养,然后再进行检测。通过生化检验、血清学和 qPCR 确认推定的沙门氏菌。所有这三种快速检测方法与 FDA BAM 方法相比,效果都很好。在 p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
期刊最新文献
Ecology and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in wildlife: insights into specialist and generalist lineages and zoonotic potential. Biotransformation of Naproxen by an atoxigenic Bacillus cereus group strain closely related to Bacillus anthracis: Linking Genomic Features to Biodegradative Activity. First evidence of SO2-releasing bags controlling fungal growth, aflatoxins and cyclopiazonic acid contamination in unshelled peanuts. Bactericidal and anti-virulence effects of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil against foodborne pathogens: in vitro and milk matrix assay. Native bradyrhizobia for soybean: genetic and functional diversity in Heihe soils, a major production zone of Heilongjiang, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1