Increased Care Provision and Caregiver Wellbeing: Moderation by Changes in Social Network Care Provision.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbae015
Allison Kirkegaard, Esther M Friedman, Sarah Edgington, David Kennedy
{"title":"Increased Care Provision and Caregiver Wellbeing: Moderation by Changes in Social Network Care Provision.","authors":"Allison Kirkegaard, Esther M Friedman, Sarah Edgington, David Kennedy","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous research links increased care provision to worse wellbeing among family and friend caregivers, both before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We expand on this by incorporating data on caregivers' social networks and exploring the relationships between own and network changes in care during the pandemic and caregiver wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use nationally representative data from 1,876 family and friend caregivers in the first wave of our Care Network Connections over Time study (fielded 12/17/2020-1/4/2021) who had provided care continuously since before the COVID-19 pandemic began. Caregivers were asked about the amount of care that they and each member of their social networks were providing at the time of the survey relative to before the pandemic. We use multivariate regression models to examine the associations between five caregiver wellbeing outcomes and changes in care, and explore the moderating role of networks' changes in care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among caregivers who had provided care since prior to the pandemic, most increased (42.0%) or maintained the same (40.8%) care. Their networks also typically increased (33.4%) or maintained (46.5%) care. Increasing one's own care provision was associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and emotional difficulty than maintaining stable care. Among those who increased care, these levels were highest when the network also increased or decreased care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Increased care provision was most strongly associated with poor caregiver wellbeing in contexts where caregivers' social networks also changed care provisions. Supports for caregivers undertaking additional care tasks should take into account caregivers' networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Previous research links increased care provision to worse wellbeing among family and friend caregivers, both before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We expand on this by incorporating data on caregivers' social networks and exploring the relationships between own and network changes in care during the pandemic and caregiver wellbeing.

Methods: We use nationally representative data from 1,876 family and friend caregivers in the first wave of our Care Network Connections over Time study (fielded 12/17/2020-1/4/2021) who had provided care continuously since before the COVID-19 pandemic began. Caregivers were asked about the amount of care that they and each member of their social networks were providing at the time of the survey relative to before the pandemic. We use multivariate regression models to examine the associations between five caregiver wellbeing outcomes and changes in care, and explore the moderating role of networks' changes in care.

Results: Among caregivers who had provided care since prior to the pandemic, most increased (42.0%) or maintained the same (40.8%) care. Their networks also typically increased (33.4%) or maintained (46.5%) care. Increasing one's own care provision was associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and emotional difficulty than maintaining stable care. Among those who increased care, these levels were highest when the network also increased or decreased care.

Discussion: Increased care provision was most strongly associated with poor caregiver wellbeing in contexts where caregivers' social networks also changed care provisions. Supports for caregivers undertaking additional care tasks should take into account caregivers' networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供更多护理与护理人员的福祉:社会网络护理服务变化的调节作用。
研究目的以前的研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,提供更多的护理服务会导致亲友护理者的幸福感下降。在此基础上,我们纳入了照顾者的社会网络数据,并探讨了大流行期间照顾者自身和网络变化与照顾者福祉之间的关系:我们使用了具有全国代表性的 1,876 名亲友照护者的数据,这些照护者参加了第一波 "照护网络随时间变化的联系 "研究(于 2020 年 12 月 17 日-2021 年 4 月 1 日进行),他们自 COVID-19 大流行开始之前就一直提供照护服务。我们询问了护理人员在接受调查时,他们及其社交网络中的每个成员提供的护理数量与大流行之前相比的情况。我们使用多元回归模型研究了五种护理人员福利结果与护理变化之间的关联,并探讨了网络护理变化的调节作用:在自大流行之前就提供护理服务的护理人员中,大多数人增加了护理服务(42.0%)或保持不变(40.8%)。他们的网络通常也会增加(33.4%)或维持(46.5%)护理服务。与保持稳定的护理相比,增加自身护理与更高程度的焦虑、抑郁、孤独和情绪困难相关。在增加护理服务的人群中,当护理网络也增加或减少护理服务时,这些程度最高:讨论:在照顾者的社交网络也改变了照顾方式的情况下,增加照顾服务与照顾者的福利不佳关系最为密切。为承担额外护理任务的护理者提供的支持应考虑到护理者的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Intended Utilization of Home-Based Long-Term Care Among Older Adults in China: The Moderating Effect of Community Support. Does Pain Explain Trends in Disability? An Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Adults, 2002-2018. Neighborhood Stressors and Epigenetic Age Acceleration among Older Americans. Associations between Loneliness, Epigenetic Aging, and Multimorbidity through Older Adulthood. Loneliness Trajectories in U.S. Military Veterans: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study of Risk and Protective Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1