Laboratory tests for investigating anemia: From an expert system to artificial intelligence

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Practical Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00357
Philippe Halfon , Guillaume Penaranda , Dan Ringwald , Frederique Retornaz , Nicolas Boissel , Sylvain Bodard , Jean Marc Feryn , David Bensoussan , Patrice Cacoub
{"title":"Laboratory tests for investigating anemia: From an expert system to artificial intelligence","authors":"Philippe Halfon ,&nbsp;Guillaume Penaranda ,&nbsp;Dan Ringwald ,&nbsp;Frederique Retornaz ,&nbsp;Nicolas Boissel ,&nbsp;Sylvain Bodard ,&nbsp;Jean Marc Feryn ,&nbsp;David Bensoussan ,&nbsp;Patrice Cacoub","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the laboratory tests conducted in real-life settings for patients with anemia with the expected prescriptions derived from an optimal checkup.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A panel of experts formulated an “optimal laboratory test assessment\" specific to each anemia profile. A retrospective analysis was done of the laboratory tests conducted according to the type of anemia (microcytic, normocytic or macrocytic). Using an algorithmic system, the laboratory tests performed in real-life practice were compared with the recommendations suggested in the “optimal laboratory test assessment” and with seemingly “unnecessary” laboratory tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the analysis of the “optimal laboratory test assessment”, of the 1179 patients with microcytic anemia, 269 (22.8%) had had one of the three tests recommended by the expert system, and only 33 (2.8%) had all three tests. For normocytic anemia, 1054 of 2313 patients (45.6%) had one of the eleven recommended tests, and none had all eleven. Of the 384 patients with macrocytic anemia, 196 (51%) had one of the four recommended tests, and none had all four. In the analysis of “unnecessary laboratory tests\", one lab test was unnecessarily done in 727/3876 patients (18.8%), i.e. 339 of 1179 (28.8%) microcytic, 171 of 2313 (7.4%) normocytic, and 217 of 384 (56.5 %) macrocytic anemias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Laboratory investigations of anemia remain imperfect as more than half of the cases did not receive the expected tests. Analyzing other diagnostic domains, the authors are currently developing an artificial intelligence system to assist physicians in enhancing the efficiency of their laboratory test prescriptions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000039/pdfft?md5=2ffe98457e0edcdbb69e1c04318ccbe6&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000039-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the laboratory tests conducted in real-life settings for patients with anemia with the expected prescriptions derived from an optimal checkup.

Methods

A panel of experts formulated an “optimal laboratory test assessment" specific to each anemia profile. A retrospective analysis was done of the laboratory tests conducted according to the type of anemia (microcytic, normocytic or macrocytic). Using an algorithmic system, the laboratory tests performed in real-life practice were compared with the recommendations suggested in the “optimal laboratory test assessment” and with seemingly “unnecessary” laboratory tests.

Results

In the analysis of the “optimal laboratory test assessment”, of the 1179 patients with microcytic anemia, 269 (22.8%) had had one of the three tests recommended by the expert system, and only 33 (2.8%) had all three tests. For normocytic anemia, 1054 of 2313 patients (45.6%) had one of the eleven recommended tests, and none had all eleven. Of the 384 patients with macrocytic anemia, 196 (51%) had one of the four recommended tests, and none had all four. In the analysis of “unnecessary laboratory tests", one lab test was unnecessarily done in 727/3876 patients (18.8%), i.e. 339 of 1179 (28.8%) microcytic, 171 of 2313 (7.4%) normocytic, and 217 of 384 (56.5 %) macrocytic anemias.

Conclusion

Laboratory investigations of anemia remain imperfect as more than half of the cases did not receive the expected tests. Analyzing other diagnostic domains, the authors are currently developing an artificial intelligence system to assist physicians in enhancing the efficiency of their laboratory test prescriptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查贫血的实验室测试:从专家系统到人工智能
方法 专家小组针对每种贫血类型制定了 "最佳实验室检查评估"。根据贫血类型(小红细胞性、正常红细胞性或大红细胞性)对所进行的实验室检查进行了回顾性分析。结果在对 "最佳实验室检查评估 "的分析中,1179 名微小细胞性贫血患者中,有 269 人(22.8%)进行了专家系统推荐的三项检查中的一项,只有 33 人(2.8%)进行了所有三项检查。至于正常红细胞性贫血,2313 名患者中有 1054 人(45.6%)接受过 11 项推荐检测中的一项,没有人接受过全部 11 项检测。在 384 名巨幼红细胞性贫血患者中,有 196 人(51%)进行了四项建议化验中的一项,没有人进行了全部四项化验。在对 "不必要的实验室检查 "的分析中,727/3876 名患者(18.8%)不必要地做了一项实验室检查,即 1179 人中有 339 人(28.8%)患有小红细胞性贫血,2313 人中有 171 人(7.4%)患有正常红细胞性贫血,384 人中有 217 人(56.5%)患有大红细胞性贫血。通过对其他诊断领域的分析,作者目前正在开发一种人工智能系统,以协助医生提高化验处方的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
期刊最新文献
Development of a rapid LFA test based on direct RT-LAMP for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 The measurement of immunosuppressive drugs by mass spectrometry and immunoassay in a South African transplant setting Falsely abnormal serum protein electrophoresis after administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG): A retrospective cohort study Glycated albumin in pregnancy correlates negatively with body mass index and contributes to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus A novel case of Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis following prenatal diagnosis: Case report from Huizhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1