Exploring the curricular and pedagogical decision criteria for research-based learning design in undergraduate studies

IF 1.5 4区社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102409

Pourya Pourhejazy , K. Robert Isaksen

{"title":"Exploring the curricular and pedagogical decision criteria for research-based learning design in undergraduate studies","authors":"Pourya Pourhejazy , K. Robert Isaksen","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learning design has a multifaceted nature requiring a range of course- and institutional considerations. Analyzing the decision criteria’s influence on research-based learning design helps understand the causes of the success/failure of the approach in achieving the teaching goals to improve the study programs. This study explores the interrelationship between the curricular and pedagogical criteria for research-based learning design decisions at the undergraduate level. For this purpose, the DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method is used to systematically analyze the decisive criteria and their causal relationships. Feedback from education professionals and university professors from Scandinavian universities is used to validate the pedagogy decision framework and provides input into the DEMATEL method. The student's role in the course is identified as the central criterion, featuring the highest level of interactions in the network of curricular and pedagogical decision criteria. Results are supportive of the identified institutional and course-specific criteria as prerequisites for the study outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000107/pdfft?md5=5c9f528da9face5f060fe9485227116f&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000107-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning design has a multifaceted nature requiring a range of course- and institutional considerations. Analyzing the decision criteria’s influence on research-based learning design helps understand the causes of the success/failure of the approach in achieving the teaching goals to improve the study programs. This study explores the interrelationship between the curricular and pedagogical criteria for research-based learning design decisions at the undergraduate level. For this purpose, the DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method is used to systematically analyze the decisive criteria and their causal relationships. Feedback from education professionals and university professors from Scandinavian universities is used to validate the pedagogy decision framework and provides input into the DEMATEL method. The student's role in the course is identified as the central criterion, featuring the highest level of interactions in the network of curricular and pedagogical decision criteria. Results are supportive of the identified institutional and course-specific criteria as prerequisites for the study outcomes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

探索本科研究型学习设计的课程和教学决策标准

学习设计具有多面性，需要对课程和机构进行多方面的考虑。分析决策标准对研究性学习设计的影响，有助于了解该方法在实现教学目标以改进学习计划方面的成败原因。本研究探讨了本科研究型学习设计决策的课程和教学标准之间的相互关系。为此，本研究采用了 "DECISION-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) "方法，对决定性标准及其因果关系进行了系统分析。来自斯堪的纳维亚大学的教育专业人士和大学教授的反馈意见被用来验证教学法决策框架，并为 DEMATEL 方法提供输入。学生在课程中的角色被确定为核心标准，在课程和教学决策标准网络中的互动程度最高。研究结果证明，已确定的机构和课程特定标准是取得研究成果的先决条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

6.20%

发文量

112

期刊介绍： Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.