Outcome of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures following diagnosis in the epilepsy monitoring unit

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1363459
Rachelle Abi-Nahed, Jimmy Li, Jasmine Carlier, Véronica Birca, Arline-Aude Bérubé, Dang Khoa Nguyen
{"title":"Outcome of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures following diagnosis in the epilepsy monitoring unit","authors":"Rachelle Abi-Nahed, Jimmy Li, Jasmine Carlier, Véronica Birca, Arline-Aude Bérubé, Dang Khoa Nguyen","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1363459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo study the outcome of patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) after their diagnosis in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).MethodsPatients diagnosed in our EMU with definite PNES between January 2009 and May 2023 were contacted by phone, and those who agreed to participate were asked a set of predetermined questions. Comparative analyses were carried out on several variables before and after diagnosis: number of participants with daily PNES, number of visits to the emergency department, number of participants who consulted their general practitioner or a neurologist outside of a scheduled follow-up, number of participants who took antiseizure medications (ASMs) or psychotropic drugs, and employment status.ResultsOut of the 103 patients with a definite diagnosis of PNES, 61 patients (79% female) accepted to participate in our study. The median age at PNES onset was 35 years, and the median delay to diagnosis was 3 years. Almost two-thirds (62%) were receiving ASMs and 40% psychotropic drugs. The mean stay at the EMU was 5 days. PNES diagnosis was explained to almost all patients (97%) by the end of their EMU stay and was well-accepted by most (89%). When contacted, 46% of participants no longer had PNES; 32% mentioned that their PNES had ceased immediately upon communication of the diagnosis. The median follow-up duration was 51 months. Fewer patients had daily seizures after the diagnosis (18 vs. 38%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.0455). Similarly, the median number of emergency department visits was significantly lower (0 vs. 2; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001). Only 17 patients consulted their general practitioner (vs. 40, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001) and 20 a neurologist (vs. 55, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001) after a PNES attack outside of a scheduled follow-up. The use of ASMs was also significantly reduced from 70 to 33% (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.01), with only one still taking an ASM for its antiseizure properties. Significantly more participants were working at last follow-up than at PNES diagnosis (49 vs. 25%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001).ConclusionOur study revealed a relatively favorable long-term outcome of definite PNES diagnosed in the EMU that translated in significant reductions in PNES frequency, health care utilization and ASM use, as well as a significant increase in employment rate.","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1363459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the outcome of patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) after their diagnosis in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).MethodsPatients diagnosed in our EMU with definite PNES between January 2009 and May 2023 were contacted by phone, and those who agreed to participate were asked a set of predetermined questions. Comparative analyses were carried out on several variables before and after diagnosis: number of participants with daily PNES, number of visits to the emergency department, number of participants who consulted their general practitioner or a neurologist outside of a scheduled follow-up, number of participants who took antiseizure medications (ASMs) or psychotropic drugs, and employment status.ResultsOut of the 103 patients with a definite diagnosis of PNES, 61 patients (79% female) accepted to participate in our study. The median age at PNES onset was 35 years, and the median delay to diagnosis was 3 years. Almost two-thirds (62%) were receiving ASMs and 40% psychotropic drugs. The mean stay at the EMU was 5 days. PNES diagnosis was explained to almost all patients (97%) by the end of their EMU stay and was well-accepted by most (89%). When contacted, 46% of participants no longer had PNES; 32% mentioned that their PNES had ceased immediately upon communication of the diagnosis. The median follow-up duration was 51 months. Fewer patients had daily seizures after the diagnosis (18 vs. 38%; p &lt; 0.0455). Similarly, the median number of emergency department visits was significantly lower (0 vs. 2; p &lt; 0.001). Only 17 patients consulted their general practitioner (vs. 40, p &lt; 0.001) and 20 a neurologist (vs. 55, p &lt; 0.001) after a PNES attack outside of a scheduled follow-up. The use of ASMs was also significantly reduced from 70 to 33% (p &lt; 0.01), with only one still taking an ASM for its antiseizure properties. Significantly more participants were working at last follow-up than at PNES diagnosis (49 vs. 25%; p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionOur study revealed a relatively favorable long-term outcome of definite PNES diagnosed in the EMU that translated in significant reductions in PNES frequency, health care utilization and ASM use, as well as a significant increase in employment rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫监测室诊断出精神性非癫痫发作后的结果
方法 通过电话联系 2009 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在本院癫痫监测室确诊为精神性非癫痫发作(PNES)的患者,并向同意参与的患者提出一系列预先确定的问题。我们对确诊前后的几个变量进行了比较分析:每天出现 PNES 的人数、到急诊科就诊的人数、在预定随访之外咨询全科医生或神经科医生的人数、服用抗癫痫药物(ASMs)或精神药物的人数以及就业状况。PNES 发病年龄的中位数为 35 岁,确诊时间的中位数为 3 年。近三分之二的患者(62%)正在接受ASMs治疗,40%正在接受精神药物治疗。在急诊室的平均住院时间为5天。几乎所有患者(97%)在急诊室住院结束时都得到了 PNES 诊断的解释,并且大多数患者(89%)都接受了该诊断。在与患者取得联系后,46%的患者已不再患有PNES;32%的患者表示,他们的PNES在诊断结果告知后立即停止。随访时间的中位数为 51 个月。确诊后每天都有癫痫发作的患者较少(18 对 38%;p &lt;0.0455)。同样,到急诊室就诊的中位数也明显减少(0 对 2;p &;lt;0.001)。仅有 17 名患者在 PNES 发作后在预定的复诊时间之外咨询了全科医生(与 40 名相比,p&lt; 0.001),20 名患者咨询了神经科医生(与 55 名相比,p&lt; 0.001)。ASMs 的使用率也从 70% 显著降至 33%(p &;lt;0.01),只有一人仍在服用 ASMs 以达到抗癫痫的效果。结论:我们的研究表明,在EMU确诊的明确PNES患者的长期疗效相对较好,PNES发作频率、医疗保健使用率和ASM使用率均显著降低,就业率也大幅提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Brain glucose metabolism in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing rehabilitation: a longitudinal 18F-FDG PET study. Healthy dietary intake diminishes the effect of cerebral small vessel disease on cognitive performance in older adults. Measuring electrophysiological changes induced by sub-concussive impacts due to soccer ball heading. Mechanisms and clinical significance of Tumarkin-like phenomenon during the final step of the Epley and Semont maneuver: insights from virtual simulation and literature review. Safety and efficacy of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1