Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities (G.E.P.S.U.)

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Policy Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0
A. Martí-De Olives, M. C. Terol Cantero, M. Martín-Aragón, E. Lozano Chiarlones, M. J. Navarro-Ríos, C. Vázquez-Rodríguez
{"title":"Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities (G.E.P.S.U.)","authors":"A. Martí-De Olives, M. C. Terol Cantero, M. Martín-Aragón, E. Lozano Chiarlones, M. J. Navarro-Ríos, C. Vázquez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, policies have been implemented in Europe to promote gender equality in higher education and in academic research. The Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality of women and men contemplates Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) as a tool for companies and organizations, including universities, to achieve this end. One of the most relevant concerns in any GEP is the initial diagnosis of the situation, but the literature also points out a need for periodical monitoring of the state of inequalities to measure the impact, effects and consequences of the implemented actions of the plan. Hence, the aim of this article was to develop a questionnaire for equality as perceived by staff in a university labor context and to explore its preliminary psychometric properties. The GEPSU (Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities) was developed by a group of women researchers who all have expertise in gender studies and experience and training in GEPs. A total of 270 people from different staff categories answered the GEPSU by Google Form survey at a Spanish Public University. The results for the dimensional structure and construct validity of the GEPSU showed three factors: labor Equality (Factor 1), Conciliation (Factor 2) and Motherhood/Fatherhood (Factor 3). We found high correlations between them and the results for their internal consistency were optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, policies have been implemented in Europe to promote gender equality in higher education and in academic research. The Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality of women and men contemplates Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) as a tool for companies and organizations, including universities, to achieve this end. One of the most relevant concerns in any GEP is the initial diagnosis of the situation, but the literature also points out a need for periodical monitoring of the state of inequalities to measure the impact, effects and consequences of the implemented actions of the plan. Hence, the aim of this article was to develop a questionnaire for equality as perceived by staff in a university labor context and to explore its preliminary psychometric properties. The GEPSU (Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities) was developed by a group of women researchers who all have expertise in gender studies and experience and training in GEPs. A total of 270 people from different staff categories answered the GEPSU by Google Form survey at a Spanish Public University. The results for the dimensional structure and construct validity of the GEPSU showed three factors: labor Equality (Factor 1), Conciliation (Factor 2) and Motherhood/Fatherhood (Factor 3). We found high correlations between them and the results for their internal consistency were optimal.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学性别平等感知量表(G.E.P.S.U)的编制和初步心理计量特性
近几十年来,欧洲实施了促进高等教育和学术研究中性别平等的政策。西班牙第 3/2007 号《组织法》旨在切实实现男女平等,该法将性别平等计划 (GEP)作为企业和组织(包括大学)实现这一目标的工具。性别平等计划中最重要的问题之一是对情况进行初步诊断,但文献也指出有必要对不平等状况进 行定期监测,以衡量计划实施行动的影响、效果和后果。因此,本文的目的是编制一份关于大学劳动环境中教职员工所感受到的平等的调查问卷,并探索其初步的心理测量特性。GEPSU(大学性别平等感知量表)是由一组女性研究人员编制的,她们都具有性别研究方面的专业知识,并接受过性别平等计划方面的经验和培训。在西班牙的一所公立大学中,共有 270 名不同类别的教职员工通过谷歌问卷调查回答了 GEPSU 的问题。性别平等与公共服务指数的维度结构和建构有效性结果显示有三个因子:劳动平等(因子 1)、调解(因子 2)和母爱/父爱(因子 3)。我们发现这三个因子之间的相关性很高,内部一致性结果也很理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Policy
Higher Education Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy. The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome. Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.
期刊最新文献
The Third Space in Higher Education: A Scoping Review A Question of (Academic) Honour? Motivations for Member Participation in Advisory Boards in the German Science System Women’s Leadership Dilemma: Why Ethiopian Women in Academia Prefer to Stay away from Decision-Making? Beyond the Bench: The Professional Identity of Research Management and Administration The ‘Problem’ of University-Industry Linkages: Insights from Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1