Mangrove ecosystem species mapping from integrated Sentinel-2 imagery and field spectral data using random forest algorithm

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Applied Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1117/1.jrs.18.014509
Nirmawana Simarmata, Ketut Wikantika, Soni Darmawan, Agung Budi Harto, Anjar Dimara Sakti, Aki Asmoro Santo
{"title":"Mangrove ecosystem species mapping from integrated Sentinel-2 imagery and field spectral data using random forest algorithm","authors":"Nirmawana Simarmata, Ketut Wikantika, Soni Darmawan, Agung Budi Harto, Anjar Dimara Sakti, Aki Asmoro Santo","doi":"10.1117/1.jrs.18.014509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mangroves maintain coastal balance and have the greatest potential for carbon sequestration. Most mapping studies on mangroves have focused on their extent and distribution and rarely featured mangrove species. Therefore, the objective of our study is to investigate mangrove species mapping from integrated Sentinel-2 imagery and field spectral data using a random forest (RF) algorithm. Study areas are located in East and South Lampung, Indonesia. The field samples used represented 144 points of mangrove species. The classification method used an RF algorithm and four models with varying parameters: model 1 with Sentinel-2; model 2 with both Sentinel-2 and field spectral data; model 3 with Sentinel-2, field spectral data, and spectrally transformed data; and model 4 only with spectrally transformed data. The results showed that Rhizophora mucronata, Sonneratia alba, Avicennia lanata, and Avicennia marina were the most common mangrove species in these areas, with reflectance values in the range of 0.002 to 0.493, 0.006 to 0.833, 0.014 to 0.768, and 0.002 to 0.758. Permutation importance (PI) that affects the classification model is the red band, near-infrared, and green normalized difference vegetation index, where the most PI in model 3 is 0.283. The highest level of agreement for mangrove species is found in model 3. Model 3 is the best parameter for RF classification that showed the best mapping accuracy, with the overall accuracy, user accuracy, producer accuracy, and kappa value being 81.25%, 81.68%, 81.25%, and 0.80, respectively.","PeriodicalId":54879,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.18.014509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mangroves maintain coastal balance and have the greatest potential for carbon sequestration. Most mapping studies on mangroves have focused on their extent and distribution and rarely featured mangrove species. Therefore, the objective of our study is to investigate mangrove species mapping from integrated Sentinel-2 imagery and field spectral data using a random forest (RF) algorithm. Study areas are located in East and South Lampung, Indonesia. The field samples used represented 144 points of mangrove species. The classification method used an RF algorithm and four models with varying parameters: model 1 with Sentinel-2; model 2 with both Sentinel-2 and field spectral data; model 3 with Sentinel-2, field spectral data, and spectrally transformed data; and model 4 only with spectrally transformed data. The results showed that Rhizophora mucronata, Sonneratia alba, Avicennia lanata, and Avicennia marina were the most common mangrove species in these areas, with reflectance values in the range of 0.002 to 0.493, 0.006 to 0.833, 0.014 to 0.768, and 0.002 to 0.758. Permutation importance (PI) that affects the classification model is the red band, near-infrared, and green normalized difference vegetation index, where the most PI in model 3 is 0.283. The highest level of agreement for mangrove species is found in model 3. Model 3 is the best parameter for RF classification that showed the best mapping accuracy, with the overall accuracy, user accuracy, producer accuracy, and kappa value being 81.25%, 81.68%, 81.25%, and 0.80, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用随机森林算法从综合哨兵-2 图像和实地光谱数据中绘制红树林生态系统物种分布图
红树林能维持海岸平衡,并具有最大的固碳潜力。大多数红树林绘图研究都侧重于红树林的范围和分布,很少涉及红树林物种。因此,我们的研究目标是利用随机森林(RF)算法,从综合哨兵-2 图像和实地光谱数据中研究红树林物种绘图。研究区域位于印度尼西亚楠榜东部和南部。所使用的野外样本代表了 144 个红树林物种点。分类方法使用了 RF 算法和参数不同的四个模型:模型 1 使用哨兵-2;模型 2 使用哨兵-2 和野外光谱数据;模型 3 使用哨兵-2、野外光谱数据和光谱转换数据;模型 4 仅使用光谱转换数据。结果显示,Rhizophora mucronata、Sonneratia alba、Avicennia lanata 和 Avicennia marina 是这些地区最常见的红树林物种,其反射率值范围分别为 0.002 至 0.493、0.006 至 0.833、0.014 至 0.768 和 0.002 至 0.758。影响分类模型的置换重要度(PI)是红波段、近红外和绿色归一化差异植被指数,其中模型 3 的置换重要度最高,为 0.283。模型 3 中红树林物种的一致性最高。模型 3 是射频分类的最佳参数,显示出最好的绘图精度,总体精度、用户精度、生产者精度和 kappa 值分别为 81.25%、81.68%、81.25% 和 0.80。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Remote Sensing is a peer-reviewed journal that optimizes the communication of concepts, information, and progress among the remote sensing community.
期刊最新文献
Few-shot synthetic aperture radar object detection algorithm based on meta-learning and variational inference Object-based strategy for generating high-resolution four-dimensional thermal surface models of buildings based on integration of visible and thermal unmanned aerial vehicle imagery Frequent oversights in on-orbit modulation transfer function estimation of optical imager onboard EO satellites Comprehensive comparison of different gridded precipitation products over geographic regions of Türkiye Monitoring soil moisture in cotton fields with synthetic aperture radar and optical data in arid and semi-arid regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1