Descemetic Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Advanced Keratoconus: Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.2147/tcrm.s441577
Leopoldo Spadea, Lucia Di Genova, Edoardo Trovato Battagliola, Stefano Scordari
{"title":"Descemetic Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Advanced Keratoconus: Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes","authors":"Leopoldo Spadea, Lucia Di Genova, Edoardo Trovato Battagliola, Stefano Scordari","doi":"10.2147/tcrm.s441577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> To assess and contrast the visual and refractive results of Descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the treatment of advanced keratoconus.<br/><strong>Design:</strong> Retrospective, comparative, interventional study.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> This study enrolled eyes affected by keratoconus with preoperative mean keratometry ≥ 60 diopters (D) that were treated with either Descemetic DALK (30 eyes) or PK (29 eyes) by using always the same corneal diameters (8.00mm recipient; 8.25mm donor cornea) and the same suture technique (10– 0 nylon double-running 12-bites continuous suture). The outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refractive astigmatism (SRAst), and keratometric astigmatism at 3mm area (SimK), spherical equivalent (SEq).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Postoperative visual acuity significantly improved in both groups. Mean CDVA was higher in the DALK group 3 months (DALK 0.61, PK 0.42, p&lt; 0.05), 6 months (DALK 0.69, PK 0.44, p&lt; 0.05), and 12 months (DALK 0.72, PK 0.45, p&lt; 0.05) postoperatively. However, 6 months after suture removal, CDVA was not statistically different between the two groups (DALK 0.71, PK 0.75, p&gt; 0.05). Final SRAst and SimK also were comparable between the two groups (respectively DALK 2.97, PK:2.81, p&gt; 0.05; DALK 3.91, PK 2.37, p&gt; 0.05). No significant statistical differences were noted for UCVA and SEq data during the entire follow-up period between the two groups.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Both methods of corneal transplantation resulted in a notable enhancement of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes afflicted by advanced keratoconus. Descemetic DALK demonstrated superior visual acuity before suture removal, whereas DALK and PK exhibited comparable results in terms of visual acuity, refractive correction, and keratometric astigmatism after suture removal.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> astigmatism, corneal topography, descemetic dalk, keratoconus, PK<br/>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s441577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess and contrast the visual and refractive results of Descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the treatment of advanced keratoconus.
Design: Retrospective, comparative, interventional study.
Methods: This study enrolled eyes affected by keratoconus with preoperative mean keratometry ≥ 60 diopters (D) that were treated with either Descemetic DALK (30 eyes) or PK (29 eyes) by using always the same corneal diameters (8.00mm recipient; 8.25mm donor cornea) and the same suture technique (10– 0 nylon double-running 12-bites continuous suture). The outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refractive astigmatism (SRAst), and keratometric astigmatism at 3mm area (SimK), spherical equivalent (SEq).
Results: Postoperative visual acuity significantly improved in both groups. Mean CDVA was higher in the DALK group 3 months (DALK 0.61, PK 0.42, p< 0.05), 6 months (DALK 0.69, PK 0.44, p< 0.05), and 12 months (DALK 0.72, PK 0.45, p< 0.05) postoperatively. However, 6 months after suture removal, CDVA was not statistically different between the two groups (DALK 0.71, PK 0.75, p> 0.05). Final SRAst and SimK also were comparable between the two groups (respectively DALK 2.97, PK:2.81, p> 0.05; DALK 3.91, PK 2.37, p> 0.05). No significant statistical differences were noted for UCVA and SEq data during the entire follow-up period between the two groups.
Conclusion: Both methods of corneal transplantation resulted in a notable enhancement of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes afflicted by advanced keratoconus. Descemetic DALK demonstrated superior visual acuity before suture removal, whereas DALK and PK exhibited comparable results in terms of visual acuity, refractive correction, and keratometric astigmatism after suture removal.

Keywords: astigmatism, corneal topography, descemetic dalk, keratoconus, PK
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期角膜病中的去角质前深层角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术:视觉和屈光效果比较
目的:评估和对比 Descemetic 深前板层角膜移植术(DALK)和穿透性角膜移植术(PK)在治疗晚期角膜炎中的视觉和屈光效果:设计:回顾性、对比性、介入性研究:本研究招募了术前平均角膜度数≥60屈光度(D)的角膜炎患眼,采用相同的角膜直径(8.00毫米受体角膜;8.25毫米供体角膜)和相同的缝合技术(10-0尼龙双流12咬合连续缝合),对其进行Descemetic DALK(30眼)或PK(29眼)治疗。结果测量指标为术后未矫正远距离视力(UDVA)、最佳矫正远距离视力(CDVA)、主观屈光散光(SRAst)、3 毫米区域角膜散光(SimK)、球面等值(SEq):两组患者术后视力均有明显提高。DALK 组术后 3 个月(DALK 0.61,PK 0.42,p< 0.05)、6 个月(DALK 0.69,PK 0.44,p< 0.05)和 12 个月(DALK 0.72,PK 0.45,p< 0.05)的平均 CDVA 较高。但在拆线 6 个月后,两组的 CDVA 没有统计学差异(DALK 0.71,PK 0.75,p> 0.05)。两组最终的 SRAst 和 SimK 也相当(分别为 DALK 2.97,PK:2.81,p> 0.05;DALK 3.91,PK 2.37,p> 0.05)。两组患者在整个随访期间的 UCVA 和 SEq 数据无明显统计学差异:结论:两种角膜移植方法都能显著提高晚期角膜炎患者的视觉和屈光效果。DALK和PK在视力、屈光矫正和角膜散光方面的效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Medications Associated with Geriatric Syndromes and Prescribing Patterns: The Impact of Excessive Polypharmacy in Older Adult Patients. Three Artificial Liver Models of Treatment of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. The Utility of Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation. Potentially Risk Factors for New Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Analysis of Influencing Factors and Construction of Predictive Model for Persistent Cough After Lung Cancer Resection Under Thoracoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1