The impact of board gender diversity on the accrual/real earnings management practice: evidence from an emerging market

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS Future Business Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s43093-024-00307-7
Eman F. Attia, Sameh Yassen, Ahmed Chafai, Ahmed Qotb
{"title":"The impact of board gender diversity on the accrual/real earnings management practice: evidence from an emerging market","authors":"Eman F. Attia, Sameh Yassen, Ahmed Chafai, Ahmed Qotb","doi":"10.1186/s43093-024-00307-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the impact of gender diversity on financial reporting quality (accrual and real earnings management). We use a sample of 78 Egyptian listed companies over the period 2009–2021. The quality of financial reporting is measured using different models of earnings management (accrual and real earnings management). Accrual earnings management (AEM) is detected through four different models developed by modified Jones model, the Kasznik model, Kothari model, Raman and Shahrur model, while real earnings management (REM) is measured using six different model which are abnormal cash flows from operations (ABCFO), abnormal production costs (ABPROD), abnormal discretionary expenditures (ABDISEXP) and three aggregate proxies (RM1, RM2, RM3). Using the system generalized method of moments, companies with more gender diversity are more effective in reducing accrual earnings manipulation (AEM). The exception is the modified Jones model. Moreover, we find that gender diversity is positively and significantly correlated with financial reporting quality based on proxies of real earnings-based activity, except for RM2. The study found a non-significant and negative relationship between board diversity and RM2 as a proxy for REM. Overall, the empirical results based on accrual and real earnings management models (AEM and REM) support the notion that enterprises with more gender diversity on the board are more effective in controlling earnings manipulation practices. The predictions of corporate governance theories are confirmed. Policy makers should continue to promote and support gender diversity in leadership positions within organizations. This can be achieved through initiatives such as diversity quotas, mentoring programs, and leadership development opportunities for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":44859,"journal":{"name":"Future Business Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Business Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00307-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of gender diversity on financial reporting quality (accrual and real earnings management). We use a sample of 78 Egyptian listed companies over the period 2009–2021. The quality of financial reporting is measured using different models of earnings management (accrual and real earnings management). Accrual earnings management (AEM) is detected through four different models developed by modified Jones model, the Kasznik model, Kothari model, Raman and Shahrur model, while real earnings management (REM) is measured using six different model which are abnormal cash flows from operations (ABCFO), abnormal production costs (ABPROD), abnormal discretionary expenditures (ABDISEXP) and three aggregate proxies (RM1, RM2, RM3). Using the system generalized method of moments, companies with more gender diversity are more effective in reducing accrual earnings manipulation (AEM). The exception is the modified Jones model. Moreover, we find that gender diversity is positively and significantly correlated with financial reporting quality based on proxies of real earnings-based activity, except for RM2. The study found a non-significant and negative relationship between board diversity and RM2 as a proxy for REM. Overall, the empirical results based on accrual and real earnings management models (AEM and REM) support the notion that enterprises with more gender diversity on the board are more effective in controlling earnings manipulation practices. The predictions of corporate governance theories are confirmed. Policy makers should continue to promote and support gender diversity in leadership positions within organizations. This can be achieved through initiatives such as diversity quotas, mentoring programs, and leadership development opportunities for women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会性别多样性对权责发生制/实际收益管理实践的影响:来自新兴市场的证据
本文研究了性别多样性对财务报告质量(应计制和实际收益管理)的影响。我们以 2009-2021 年间 78 家埃及上市公司为样本。财务报告质量采用不同的收益管理(应计收益管理和实际收益管理)模型进行衡量。权责发生制收益管理(AEM)通过修正的琼斯模型、卡兹尼克模型、科塔里模型、拉曼和沙鲁尔模型开发的四种不同模型进行检测,而真实收益管理(REM)则使用六种不同的模型进行衡量,这些模型分别是经营活动产生的异常现金流(ABCFO)、异常生产成本(ABPROD)、异常自由支配支出(ABDISEXP)和三个综合代用指标(RM1、RM2、RM3)。利用系统广义矩法,性别多样性越多的公司在减少应计收益操纵(AEM)方面越有效。修正的琼斯模型是个例外。此外,我们还发现性别多样性与基于真实收益活动的财务报告质量呈显著正相关,但 RM2 除外。 研究发现,董事会多样性与作为 REM 替代指标的 RM2 之间存在不显著的负相关关系。总体而言,基于权责发生制和实际收益管理模型(AEM 和 REM)的实证结果支持这样一种观点,即董事会中性别多元化程度越高的企业在控制收益操纵行为方面越有效。公司治理理论的预测得到了证实。政策制定者应继续促进和支持组织内领导岗位的性别多元化。这可以通过多样性配额、指导计划和为女性提供领导力发展机会等举措来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.70%
发文量
53
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
When do shoppers prefer using QR codes? Empirical evidence from Vietnam Competitive advantage and sustainability in Ghanaian microfinance institutions: the mediating role of strategic capabilities Crowdfunding for innovation: a comprehensive empirical review A bibliometric review on gender equity in human resource management The blue economy effects on EUROMED tourism: forecasting approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1