Statistical modelling of aquatic size spectra: integrating data from multiple taxa and sampling methods

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.14321/aehm.026.03.17
Henrique Corrêa Giacomini, Derrick T. de Kerckhove, Victoria Kopf, Cindy Chu
{"title":"Statistical modelling of aquatic size spectra: integrating data from multiple taxa and sampling methods","authors":"Henrique Corrêa Giacomini, Derrick T. de Kerckhove, Victoria Kopf, Cindy Chu","doi":"10.14321/aehm.026.03.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Size spectra are used to assess the status and functioning of marine and freshwater ecosystems worldwide. Their use is underpinned by theory linking the dynamics of trophic interactions to a power-law decline of abundance with body size in ecological communities. Recent papers on empirical size spectrum estimation have argued for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of power-law probability distributions as a more accurate alternative to traditional linear regression approaches. One major limitation of currently used size spectrum estimators from Maximum Likelihood Estimation is that they cannot account for the use of multiple sampling protocols, nor the distortions caused by gear size selectivity, and therefore they become restricted to a relatively narrow taxonomic group and size range. Further progress in the field requires new methods that are flexible enough to combine multiple trophic groups and sampling gears into a single size spectrum estimate, while taking advantage of more accurate distributional approaches. The method we propose in this paper fills this gap by deriving the distribution of observed sizes explicitly from the underlying power-law spectrum and gear selectivity functions. It specifies likelihoods as a product of two components: (i) the probability of belonging to a given group and (ii) the probability distribution within the group. Using Bayesian estimation, we applied the method to surveys of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fishes in lakes of Quetico Provincial Park, northwestern Ontario, using Van Dorn samplers, zooplankton nets, gillnets, and hydroacoustics. The results show that the spectra estimated from subsets of trophic groups or gears are weak predictors of more complete spectra, highlighting the importance of using more inclusive community data. The two-component partitioning of likelihoods also helped demonstrate the existence of between-group spectrum slopes that were overall steeper than within-group slopes, indicating that heterogeneity of trophic transfers across the size spectrum is an important factor structuring these ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":8125,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/aehm.026.03.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Size spectra are used to assess the status and functioning of marine and freshwater ecosystems worldwide. Their use is underpinned by theory linking the dynamics of trophic interactions to a power-law decline of abundance with body size in ecological communities. Recent papers on empirical size spectrum estimation have argued for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of power-law probability distributions as a more accurate alternative to traditional linear regression approaches. One major limitation of currently used size spectrum estimators from Maximum Likelihood Estimation is that they cannot account for the use of multiple sampling protocols, nor the distortions caused by gear size selectivity, and therefore they become restricted to a relatively narrow taxonomic group and size range. Further progress in the field requires new methods that are flexible enough to combine multiple trophic groups and sampling gears into a single size spectrum estimate, while taking advantage of more accurate distributional approaches. The method we propose in this paper fills this gap by deriving the distribution of observed sizes explicitly from the underlying power-law spectrum and gear selectivity functions. It specifies likelihoods as a product of two components: (i) the probability of belonging to a given group and (ii) the probability distribution within the group. Using Bayesian estimation, we applied the method to surveys of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fishes in lakes of Quetico Provincial Park, northwestern Ontario, using Van Dorn samplers, zooplankton nets, gillnets, and hydroacoustics. The results show that the spectra estimated from subsets of trophic groups or gears are weak predictors of more complete spectra, highlighting the importance of using more inclusive community data. The two-component partitioning of likelihoods also helped demonstrate the existence of between-group spectrum slopes that were overall steeper than within-group slopes, indicating that heterogeneity of trophic transfers across the size spectrum is an important factor structuring these ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水生生物体型光谱的统计建模:整合来自多个分类群和采样方法的数据
体型光谱可用于评估全球海洋和淡水生态系统的状况和功能。其使用的理论基础是将营养相互作用的动态与生态群落中丰度随体型下降的幂律联系起来。近期有关经验性大小谱估计的论文认为,幂律概率分布的最大似然估计法(Maximum Likelihood Estimation)比传统的线性回归法更准确。目前使用的最大似然估计法尺寸谱估计的一个主要局限是,它们不能考虑多重取样方案的使用,也不能考虑渔具尺寸选择性造成的扭曲,因此它们仅限于相对狭窄的分类群和尺寸范围。该领域的进一步发展需要新的方法,这些方法必须足够灵活,能够将多个营养群组和取样渔具结合到单一的大小谱估计中,同时利用更精确的分布方法。我们在本文中提出的方法填补了这一空白,即从基本的幂律谱和渔具选择性函数中明确推导出观测到的大小分布。它将似然值指定为两个部分的乘积:(i) 属于某一群体的概率和 (ii) 群体内的概率分布。利用贝叶斯估计法,我们使用 Van Dorn 采样器、浮游动物网、刺网和水声对安大略省西北部 Quetico 省立公园湖泊中的浮游植物、浮游动物和鱼类进行了调查。结果表明,从营养群组或渔具子集估算出的光谱对更完整光谱的预测能力较弱,这突出了使用更具包容性的群落数据的重要性。对似然率的双分量划分也有助于证明组间谱系斜率的存在,总体上比组内斜率陡峭,这表明整个大小谱系中营养转移的异质性是构建这些生态系统的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles on the following themes and topics: • Original articles focusing on ecosystem-based sciences, ecosystem health and management of marine and aquatic ecosystems • Reviews, invited perspectives and keynote contributions from conferences • Special issues on important emerging topics, themes, and ecosystems (climate change, invasive species, HABs, risk assessment, models)
期刊最新文献
Impacts of dreissenid mussel growth and activity on phytoplankton and nutrients in Lake Erie's western basin Calibration versus computation: Comparison between 1D and 3D phytoplankton simulations in western Lake Erie Nitrification in the water column of Lake Erie: Seasonal patterns, community dynamics, and competition with cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms Dynamics of dissolved organic phosphorus in the nearshore of eastern Lake Erie Seasonal interactions between Quagga Mussel grazing and phytoplankton in western Lake Erie: The view from different measuring technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1