Jesuit Mission Funding and Legacy Donations: Revisiting the Belgian Controversy over the Disposition of the De Boey Estate, 1850–1868*

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1111/1467-9809.13029
H. Richard Friman
{"title":"Jesuit Mission Funding and Legacy Donations: Revisiting the Belgian Controversy over the Disposition of the De Boey Estate, 1850–1868*","authors":"H. Richard Friman","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.13029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the mid-1860s, the Belgian press and politics were riveted by legal proceedings alleging Jesuit financial predation against the estate of noted Antwerp businessman and donor to religious causes Guillaume-Joseph De Boey. These controversies remain understudied in prominent scholarship on De Boey's extensive support for Jesuit missions in the United States. More recent scholarship on religious contestation in Belgian politics during the 1850s and 1860s explores the trials but focuses on their politicisation and prominence of anti-Jesuit tropes more than the potential accuracy of the allegations of impropriety. Combining these literatures with trial transcripts and archival research, this article revisits the De Boey case to explore ways in which Jesuit funding for overseas missions navigated legal restrictions on private donations. The article reveals a pattern of proxies and regulatory evasion, but one conducted through donor complicity more than Jesuit predation. These findings add to the historiography of Jesuit funding networks and support for overseas missions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the mid-1860s, the Belgian press and politics were riveted by legal proceedings alleging Jesuit financial predation against the estate of noted Antwerp businessman and donor to religious causes Guillaume-Joseph De Boey. These controversies remain understudied in prominent scholarship on De Boey's extensive support for Jesuit missions in the United States. More recent scholarship on religious contestation in Belgian politics during the 1850s and 1860s explores the trials but focuses on their politicisation and prominence of anti-Jesuit tropes more than the potential accuracy of the allegations of impropriety. Combining these literatures with trial transcripts and archival research, this article revisits the De Boey case to explore ways in which Jesuit funding for overseas missions navigated legal restrictions on private donations. The article reveals a pattern of proxies and regulatory evasion, but one conducted through donor complicity more than Jesuit predation. These findings add to the historiography of Jesuit funding networks and support for overseas missions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耶稣会传教资金与遗产捐赠:重温 1850-1868 年比利时关于 De Boey 财产处置的争议*
19 世纪 60 年代中期,比利时新闻界和政界因耶稣会对安特卫普著名商人、宗教事业捐赠人纪尧姆-约瑟夫-德博伊的财产进行掠夺的法律诉讼而沸沸扬扬。在有关德博伊广泛支持耶稣会在美国传教的著名学术研究中,这些争议仍未得到充分研究。最近关于 19 世纪 50 年代和 60 年代比利时政治中的宗教争论的学术研究对审判进行了探讨,但更多关注的是审判的政治化和反耶稣会教义的突出地位,而不是不正当指控的潜在准确性。本文将这些文献与审判记录和档案研究相结合,重新审视了德博伊案,探讨耶稣会资助海外传教活动时如何规避对私人捐款的法律限制。文章揭示了一种代理和规避监管的模式,但这种模式是通过捐赠者的共谋而非耶稣会的掠夺来实现的。这些发现为耶稣会资助网络和支持海外传教会的史学研究增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information FrancesTanzer, Vanishing Vienna: Modernism, Philosemitism and Jews in a Postwar City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2024; pp. Xii + 252 LydiaCabrera: El Monte: Notes on the Religions, Magic, Superstitions, and Folklore of the Black and Creole People of Cuba. Translated by David Font‐Navarrete. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023; pp. 589. GuJun: Samuel Wells Williams: A Critical Biography. Jinan: Shandong Educational Press, 2023; pp. 398. Holly CrawfordPickett: The Drama of Serial Conversion in Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2024; pp. x + 264.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1