Safe and Verified Gomory Mixed-Integer Cuts in a Rational Mixed-Integer Program Framework

IF 2.6 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED SIAM Journal on Optimization Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1137/23m156046x
Leon Eifler, Ambros Gleixner
{"title":"Safe and Verified Gomory Mixed-Integer Cuts in a Rational Mixed-Integer Program Framework","authors":"Leon Eifler, Ambros Gleixner","doi":"10.1137/23m156046x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 1, Page 742-763, March 2024. <br/> Abstract. This paper is concerned with the exact solution of mixed-integer programs (MIPs) over the rational numbers, i.e., without any roundoff errors and error tolerances. Here, one computational bottleneck that should be avoided whenever possible is to employ large-scale symbolic computations. Instead it is often possible to use safe directed rounding methods, e.g., to generate provably correct dual bounds. In this work, we continue to leverage this paradigm and extend an exact branch-and-bound framework by separation routines for safe cutting planes, based on the approach first introduced by Cook, Dash, Fukasawa, and Goycoolea in 2009 [INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp. 641–649]. Constraints are aggregated safely using approximate dual multipliers from an LP solve, followed by mixed-integer rounding to generate provably valid, although slightly weaker inequalities. We generalize this approach to problem data that is not representable in floating-point arithmetic, add routines for controlling the encoding length of the resulting cutting planes, and show how these cutting planes can be verified according to the VIPR certificate standard. Furthermore, we analyze the performance impact of these cutting planes in the context of an exact MIP framework, showing that we can solve 21.5% more instances to exact optimality and reduce solving times by 26.8% on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark test set.","PeriodicalId":49529,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m156046x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 1, Page 742-763, March 2024.
Abstract. This paper is concerned with the exact solution of mixed-integer programs (MIPs) over the rational numbers, i.e., without any roundoff errors and error tolerances. Here, one computational bottleneck that should be avoided whenever possible is to employ large-scale symbolic computations. Instead it is often possible to use safe directed rounding methods, e.g., to generate provably correct dual bounds. In this work, we continue to leverage this paradigm and extend an exact branch-and-bound framework by separation routines for safe cutting planes, based on the approach first introduced by Cook, Dash, Fukasawa, and Goycoolea in 2009 [INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp. 641–649]. Constraints are aggregated safely using approximate dual multipliers from an LP solve, followed by mixed-integer rounding to generate provably valid, although slightly weaker inequalities. We generalize this approach to problem data that is not representable in floating-point arithmetic, add routines for controlling the encoding length of the resulting cutting planes, and show how these cutting planes can be verified according to the VIPR certificate standard. Furthermore, we analyze the performance impact of these cutting planes in the context of an exact MIP framework, showing that we can solve 21.5% more instances to exact optimality and reduce solving times by 26.8% on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark test set.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合理混合整数程序框架中安全且经过验证的高莫里混合整数切割
SIAM 优化期刊》,第 34 卷,第 1 期,第 742-763 页,2024 年 3 月。 摘要本文关注有理数混合整数程序(MIP)的精确求解,即没有任何舍入误差和误差容限。在此,应尽可能避免的一个计算瓶颈是采用大规模符号计算。相反,通常可以使用安全的定向舍入方法,例如,生成可证明正确的对偶边界。在这项工作中,我们继续利用这一范例,并基于 Cook、Dash、Fukasawa 和 Goycoolea 于 2009 年首次提出的方法[INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp.]利用 LP 求解中的近似对偶乘数安全地汇总约束条件,然后进行混合整数舍入,生成可证明有效的不等式,尽管不等式稍弱。我们将这种方法推广到无法用浮点运算表示的问题数据上,添加了用于控制所生成切割平面的编码长度的例程,并展示了如何根据 VIPR 证书标准验证这些切割平面。此外,我们还在精确 MIP 框架的背景下分析了这些切割平面对性能的影响,结果表明,在 MIPLIB 2017 基准测试集上,我们可以多求解 21.5% 的实例,并将求解时间缩短 26.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Optimization
SIAM Journal on Optimization 数学-应用数学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The SIAM Journal on Optimization contains research articles on the theory and practice of optimization. The areas addressed include linear and quadratic programming, convex programming, nonlinear programming, complementarity problems, stochastic optimization, combinatorial optimization, integer programming, and convex, nonsmooth and variational analysis. Contributions may emphasize optimization theory, algorithms, software, computational practice, applications, or the links between these subjects.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum and Addendum: Newton Differentiability of Convex Functions in Normed Spaces and of a Class of Operators Newton-Based Alternating Methods for the Ground State of a Class of Multicomponent Bose–Einstein Condensates Minimum Spanning Trees in Infinite Graphs: Theory and Algorithms On Minimal Extended Representations of Generalized Power Cones A Functional Model Method for Nonconvex Nonsmooth Conditional Stochastic Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1