Are there links between Alzheimer’s disease and ADHD? The efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists in controlling ADHD symptoms: a systematic review

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Middle East Current Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s43045-024-00405-w
Ramin Abdi Dezfouli, Sara Akbariforoud, Ensieh Esmaeilidezfouli
{"title":"Are there links between Alzheimer’s disease and ADHD? The efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists in controlling ADHD symptoms: a systematic review","authors":"Ramin Abdi Dezfouli, Sara Akbariforoud, Ensieh Esmaeilidezfouli","doi":"10.1186/s43045-024-00405-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of anti-Alzheimer agents (memantine, galantamine, rivastigmine, and donepezil) in controlling ADHD symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults. Following the PRISMA guideline, clinical trials assessing the potency of anti-Alzheimer medications in managing ADHD symptoms were imported from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (until February 2023). Screening stages were conducted by two independent researchers. Two independent researchers also extracted data from clinical trials reporting the outcomes as the reduction in scores of ADHD questionnaires. The risk of bias within the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, while the certainty of outcomes was evaluated based on the GRADE criteria. Of the initial 1597 studies, 11 studies were included. No studies were available for rivastigmine, and only a single study was conducted for galantamine. The results of the other two medications had a slight inconsistency. While both memantine and donepezil were reported to be effective in several studies, they were reported to be ineffective in some other studies. Side effects were mostly reduced appetite and headache. The tolerability of memantine, donepezil, and galantamine was all convincing. While galantamine did not demonstrate a promising efficacy in ADHD, memantine and donepezil showed effectiveness. However, future studies are needed to confirm their efficacy in ADHD since there was some inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":38653,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-024-00405-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of anti-Alzheimer agents (memantine, galantamine, rivastigmine, and donepezil) in controlling ADHD symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults. Following the PRISMA guideline, clinical trials assessing the potency of anti-Alzheimer medications in managing ADHD symptoms were imported from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (until February 2023). Screening stages were conducted by two independent researchers. Two independent researchers also extracted data from clinical trials reporting the outcomes as the reduction in scores of ADHD questionnaires. The risk of bias within the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, while the certainty of outcomes was evaluated based on the GRADE criteria. Of the initial 1597 studies, 11 studies were included. No studies were available for rivastigmine, and only a single study was conducted for galantamine. The results of the other two medications had a slight inconsistency. While both memantine and donepezil were reported to be effective in several studies, they were reported to be ineffective in some other studies. Side effects were mostly reduced appetite and headache. The tolerability of memantine, donepezil, and galantamine was all convincing. While galantamine did not demonstrate a promising efficacy in ADHD, memantine and donepezil showed effectiveness. However, future studies are needed to confirm their efficacy in ADHD since there was some inconsistency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病与多动症之间有联系吗?乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂和 NMDA 受体拮抗剂对控制多动症症状的疗效:系统综述
评估抗阿尔茨海默病药物(美金刚、加兰他敏、利伐斯的明和多奈哌齐)控制儿童、青少年和成人多动症症状的有效性、安全性和耐受性。按照 PRISMA 指南,从 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus(截止到 2023 年 2 月)中导入了评估抗阿尔茨海默氏症药物在控制多动症症状方面疗效的临床试验。筛选阶段由两名独立研究人员进行。两名独立研究人员还从报告结果的临床试验中提取了数据,报告结果为ADHD问卷得分的降低。使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,并根据 GRADE 标准评估了结果的确定性。在最初的 1597 项研究中,有 11 项研究被纳入。没有关于利伐斯的明的研究,只有一项关于加兰他敏的研究。其他两种药物的研究结果略有不一致。据报道,美金刚和多奈哌齐在几项研究中均有效,但在另一些研究中却无效。副作用主要是食欲减退和头痛。美金刚、多奈哌齐和加兰他敏的耐受性都令人信服。虽然加兰他敏对多动症的疗效并不乐观,但美金刚和多奈哌齐显示出了疗效。不过,由于存在一些不一致之处,还需要今后的研究来确认它们对多动症的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Middle East Current Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality in telepsychiatry is a new horizon for immersive mental health therapy Status and sociodemographic correlates of pathological internet use among adolescents in Jordan: a cross-sectional study Post-traumatic stress disorder among nursing students at Palestine Polytechnique University during the Gaza war and the attack on the health care system Psychological assessment of violent behaviors in schizophrenic patients followed up in My EL Hassan health center of Kenitra, Morocco Burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression symptoms among workers in radiation field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1