Self-Authorship Development in the Outdoors: But for Whom?

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of College Student Development Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1353/csd.2024.a919353
Patrick Filipe Conway, Kathy Chau Rohn
{"title":"Self-Authorship Development in the Outdoors: But for Whom?","authors":"Patrick Filipe Conway, Kathy Chau Rohn","doi":"10.1353/csd.2024.a919353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Self-Authorship Development in the Outdoors:<span>But for Whom?</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Patrick Filipe Conway (bio) and Kathy Chau Rohn (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Self-authorship has remained a seminal concept in developmental theory over the last several decades, describing a process in which individuals seek to achieve \"the internal capacity to define [their own] beliefs, identity, and social relations\" (Baxter Magolda, 2001, p. 269). As development occurs, individuals progress from external to internal making-making within cognitive, interpersonal, and intrapersonal domains (Baxter Magolda, 2007; Kegan, 1994). Baxter Magolda (2007) noted that an increased capacity for internal meaning-making promotes 21st-century learning outcomes important in both college and adult life, such as the development of \"effective citizenship, critical thinking and complex problem solving, interdependent relations with diverse others, and mature decision making\" (p. 69). And yet, as a theory of development originating from a constructivist lens, self-authorship has certain inherent limitations. By centering individuals, particularly those with dominant identities, inadequate attention has been paid to how systems of power and privilege impact and shape student development and mediate access to opportunities that promote such development (Abes et al., 2019). Thoughtful approaches contributing to the evolution of self-authorship theory that consider the current third wave of critical approaches to student development theory are essential.</p> <p>Colleges and universities have recently focused more attention on incorporating high-impact practices into their curricula, often under the auspices of the potential benefits such practices have for developmental growth and student success (Lange &amp; Stewart, 2019). Outdoor adventure education represents an experiential practice where students can extend their learning beyond the more traditional, heavily structured classroom environment. However, due to access and inclusion barriers, students with one or more intersecting marginalized identities remain less likely to participate in these activities (Warren et al., 2014). Additionally, the lack of empirical studies examining such experiences makes it less likely for higher education institutions to invest resources in high-impact outdoor programs (Lange &amp; Stewart, 2019).</p> <p>Our study investigated extreme cases of self-guided experiential learning by drawing on the experiences of three college students who took a semester's leave to backpack the entirety of the Appalachian Trail. The purposes of our exploratory study were twofold: (a) to more deeply understand developmental dynamics within self-authorship theory, particularly in how self-guided experiential learning <strong>[End Page 95]</strong> opportunities might contribute to such development, and (b) to situate these insights by exploring what they might mean within more critical contexts.</p> <p>The longstanding assumption within self-authorship theory that developmental growth requires facing challenges and having access to fixed systems of support necessitates further consideration. As Barber and King (2014) noted, \"the equation Challenge + Support = Development commonly used to capture this relationship is too simplistic\" (p. 445). Observing college students face serious challenges in a self-guided, peer-sustained manner provides a valuable opportunity to more fully understand this relationship and why it might lead to moments of growth within internal meaning-making. King et al. (2022) noted that reflective practices may be an essential mediating component contributing to self-authorship development. Our study built on this potentiality, suggesting that outdoor experiences—wherein opportunities for reflection are integral—are critical to explore further. We conclude this article with implications for future research, with an eye toward exploring how to make such opportunities more widely available and inclusive.</p> <h2>METHODS</h2> <p>The Appalachian Trail (AT) is a 2,200-mile footpath extending from Georgia to Maine (Arnold, 2007). Thru-hiking the AT is an intensive outdoor experience, one in which long-distance backpackers—called \"thru-hikers\"—walk the entire trail in a continuous journey. We report findings based on the experiences of two male sophomores and one female sophomore from a highly selective university on the East Coast. Danny, Timmy, and Cara (all pseudonyms) represent extreme cases of students who voluntarily took a leave from college during the Spring 2021 semester to thru-hike the AT together. Using purposive snowball sampling, we recruited Danny after seeing his thru-hike announcement on YouTube. He then introduced us to the other participants, who were all planning to hike the AT together prior to being contacted by the research team. All three participants are White STEM majors with prior hiking experience...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2024.a919353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Self-Authorship Development in the Outdoors:But for Whom?
  • Patrick Filipe Conway (bio) and Kathy Chau Rohn (bio)

Self-authorship has remained a seminal concept in developmental theory over the last several decades, describing a process in which individuals seek to achieve "the internal capacity to define [their own] beliefs, identity, and social relations" (Baxter Magolda, 2001, p. 269). As development occurs, individuals progress from external to internal making-making within cognitive, interpersonal, and intrapersonal domains (Baxter Magolda, 2007; Kegan, 1994). Baxter Magolda (2007) noted that an increased capacity for internal meaning-making promotes 21st-century learning outcomes important in both college and adult life, such as the development of "effective citizenship, critical thinking and complex problem solving, interdependent relations with diverse others, and mature decision making" (p. 69). And yet, as a theory of development originating from a constructivist lens, self-authorship has certain inherent limitations. By centering individuals, particularly those with dominant identities, inadequate attention has been paid to how systems of power and privilege impact and shape student development and mediate access to opportunities that promote such development (Abes et al., 2019). Thoughtful approaches contributing to the evolution of self-authorship theory that consider the current third wave of critical approaches to student development theory are essential.

Colleges and universities have recently focused more attention on incorporating high-impact practices into their curricula, often under the auspices of the potential benefits such practices have for developmental growth and student success (Lange & Stewart, 2019). Outdoor adventure education represents an experiential practice where students can extend their learning beyond the more traditional, heavily structured classroom environment. However, due to access and inclusion barriers, students with one or more intersecting marginalized identities remain less likely to participate in these activities (Warren et al., 2014). Additionally, the lack of empirical studies examining such experiences makes it less likely for higher education institutions to invest resources in high-impact outdoor programs (Lange & Stewart, 2019).

Our study investigated extreme cases of self-guided experiential learning by drawing on the experiences of three college students who took a semester's leave to backpack the entirety of the Appalachian Trail. The purposes of our exploratory study were twofold: (a) to more deeply understand developmental dynamics within self-authorship theory, particularly in how self-guided experiential learning [End Page 95] opportunities might contribute to such development, and (b) to situate these insights by exploring what they might mean within more critical contexts.

The longstanding assumption within self-authorship theory that developmental growth requires facing challenges and having access to fixed systems of support necessitates further consideration. As Barber and King (2014) noted, "the equation Challenge + Support = Development commonly used to capture this relationship is too simplistic" (p. 445). Observing college students face serious challenges in a self-guided, peer-sustained manner provides a valuable opportunity to more fully understand this relationship and why it might lead to moments of growth within internal meaning-making. King et al. (2022) noted that reflective practices may be an essential mediating component contributing to self-authorship development. Our study built on this potentiality, suggesting that outdoor experiences—wherein opportunities for reflection are integral—are critical to explore further. We conclude this article with implications for future research, with an eye toward exploring how to make such opportunities more widely available and inclusive.

METHODS

The Appalachian Trail (AT) is a 2,200-mile footpath extending from Georgia to Maine (Arnold, 2007). Thru-hiking the AT is an intensive outdoor experience, one in which long-distance backpackers—called "thru-hikers"—walk the entire trail in a continuous journey. We report findings based on the experiences of two male sophomores and one female sophomore from a highly selective university on the East Coast. Danny, Timmy, and Cara (all pseudonyms) represent extreme cases of students who voluntarily took a leave from college during the Spring 2021 semester to thru-hike the AT together. Using purposive snowball sampling, we recruited Danny after seeing his thru-hike announcement on YouTube. He then introduced us to the other participants, who were all planning to hike the AT together prior to being contacted by the research team. All three participants are White STEM majors with prior hiking experience...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
户外活动中的自我意识培养:但为了谁?
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 户外活动中的自我作者发展:但是为了谁? Patrick Filipe Conway(简历)和 Kathy Chau Rohn(简历) 在过去的几十年里,"自我作者 "一直是发展理论中的一个开创性概念,它描述了一个过程,在这个过程中,个体努力实现 "定义[自己的]信念、身份和社会关系的内部能力"(Baxter Magolda, 2001, p.269)。在发展过程中,个体在认知、人际和人内等领域从外部决策到内部决策不断进步(Baxter Magolda, 2007; Kegan, 1994)。Baxter Magolda(2007 年)指出,内部意义建构能力的提高会促进 21 世纪的学习成果,这对大学和成人生活都很重要,例如培养 "有效的公民意识、批判性思维和复杂问题的解决、与不同他人的相互依存关系以及成熟的决策制定"(第 69 页)。然而,作为一种源于建构主义视角的发展理论,自我创作具有一定的内在局限性。由于以个人为中心,特别是以那些具有主导身份的人为中心,人们对权力和特权体系如何影响和塑造学生的发展以及如何获得促进这种发展的机会没有给予足够的关注(Abes et al.)考虑到当前第三波学生发展理论的批判性方法,以深思熟虑的方法促进自我作者理论的发展至关重要。最近,高等院校更加关注将高影响力实践纳入其课程,这些实践往往对学生的发展成长和成功具有潜在的益处(Lange & Stewart, 2019)。户外探险教育是一种体验式实践,学生可以将学习延伸到更传统、结构更严谨的课堂环境之外。然而,由于准入和包容方面的障碍,具有一种或多种交叉边缘化身份的学生仍然不太可能参加这些活动(Warren 等人,2014 年)。此外,由于缺乏对此类体验的实证研究,高等教育机构不太可能将资源投入到影响力大的户外活动中(Lange & Stewart, 2019)。我们的研究调查了自我引导体验式学习的极端案例,借鉴了三名大学生的经验,他们请了一个学期的假,背包走完了整个阿巴拉契亚小径。我们的探索性研究有两个目的:(a)更深入地理解自我作者理论中的发展动力,特别是自我引导的体验式学习 [完 95 页] 机会如何促进这种发展;(b)通过探索这些见解在更关键的背景下可能意味着什么,来确定这些见解的位置。自我作者理论的长期假设是,发展成长需要面对挑战并获得固定的支持系统,这一假设需要进一步考虑。正如 Barber 和 King(2014 年)所指出的,"通常用来捕捉这种关系的等式'挑战 + 支持 = 发展'过于简单化"(第 445 页)。观察大学生以自我引导、同伴支持的方式面对严峻挑战的过程,为我们提供了一个宝贵的机会,让我们更全面地了解这种关系,以及为什么这种关系会带来内在意义生成的成长时刻。King 等人(2022 年)指出,反思性实践可能是促进自我作者发展的重要中介成分。我们的研究以这一潜力为基础,表明户外体验--其中反思的机会是不可或缺的--是进一步探索的关键。在本文的最后,我们提出了对未来研究的启示,着眼于探索如何使这种机会更加广泛和具有包容性。方法 阿巴拉契亚步道(AT)是从佐治亚州延伸到缅因州的一条长达 2200 英里的人行步道(Arnold,2007 年)。徒步穿越阿巴拉契亚步道是一种高强度的户外活动,在这种活动中,长途背包客--即所谓的 "穿越者"--会连续走完全程。我们报告的研究结果基于东海岸一所名校的两名大二男生和一名大二女生的经历。Danny、Timmy和Cara(均为化名)是2021年春季学期自愿请假一起徒步穿越AT的学生中的极端案例。通过有目的的滚雪球式抽样,我们在 YouTube 上看到丹尼的徒步公告后招募了他。然后,他向我们介绍了其他参与者,在研究小组联系他们之前,他们都计划一起徒步穿越亚特兰大。这三位参与者都是科技、工程和数学专业的白人,之前都有徒步旅行的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.
期刊最新文献
Black Men's Belongingness at Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Examining the Campus Environment and Culturally Engaging Practices Latina Undergraduates on the Path to Becoming Exitosas on Their Own Terms Messaging About Race: Exploring Sorority and Fraternity Social Media Test-Free Admissions at Selective Institutions: Perspectives From Admissions Professionals Negotiation Spaces: Interrogating Black Men Doctoral Students' Experiences Using Cross and Fhagen-Smith's Black Identity Development Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1