Toni Morrison's A Mercy: A Meditation on Othering

Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1353/eal.2024.a918908
Dana A. Williams
{"title":"Toni Morrison's A Mercy: A Meditation on Othering","authors":"Dana A. Williams","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Toni Morrison's <em>A Mercy</em><span>A Meditation on Othering</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dana A. Williams (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Toni Morrison has famously noted that her novels always begin with a question. In <em>The Bluest Eye</em> the question is <em>How do we make sense of a young Black girl's longing for blue eyes at a moment when chants of \"Black is beautiful\" abound?</em> In <em>Paradise</em> she asks, <em>What happens when you strip away racial markers?—what's left of the story?</em> In <em>Love</em>, we are prompted to wonder, <em>What are the unintended consequences of integration?</em> In <em>A Mercy</em>, the question is about place: <em>What can we know about a place before the people who populated it were racialized?</em></p> <p>In each instance, race/racism/racialization undergird the inquiry.<sup>1</sup> That the relationship between literature and race is of especial significance to Morrison is evidenced throughout her fiction, in interviews, and, perhaps most aggressively, in her collection of essays and lectures <em>Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination</em>, the first extended exploration of the question of race and literature (and literature's language) she offers us publicly. There she writes: \"When does racial 'unconsciousness' or awareness of race enrich interpretive language, and when does it impoverish it? What does positing one's writerly self, in the wholly racialized society that is the United States, as unraced and all others as raced entail?\" (Morrison, <em>Playing</em> xii). The queries here are meant to direct our attention to the ways American literature written by white authors often uses constructs of Blackness (characters, sounds, cultures, symbols, and the like) as narrative gearshifts—critical moments of discovery or change. This line of inquiry then leads to an interrogation of the ways the literary enterprise is or is not altruistic as a humanistic enterprise. \"When, in a race-conscious culture,\" Morrison writes, \"is that lofty goal actually approximated? When not and why?\" (xiii). Her recognition of the fact that so much of early American literature reflected a worldview that linked individual freedom to racial oppression was also a recognition of the limits of this literature. <strong>[End Page 101]</strong> What would happen if a writer rejected this singular landscape and pursued one absent \"the pressure that racialized societies level on the creative process\" (xiii)? In its determination to commingle history and fiction to re-create the North American landscape before racism is codified, <em>A Mercy</em> takes up this challenge.<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Morrison's interest in the relation of race and literature and the ways racism compromises literature's potential to enact humanism has a long history. Years before publishing <em>Playing in the Dark</em>, Morrison evidenced an interest in the topic in the classroom, both as student and as teacher. She has noted often in interviews her determination to write a paper on race in Shakespeare as an undergraduate student at Howard University (and how that determination was thwarted). As a theater student under the guidance of Owen Dodson, John Lavelle, Anne Cooke, and James Butcher, Morrison had played the role of Queen Elizabeth in a production of <em>Richard III</em>. And she had observed Dodson's reinterpretation of that play as \"Richard and the Three Queens.\" In short, she was attentive to the ways race informed Shakespeare's work. It would be years before professors and scholars would understand how such explorations taught us more about ourselves and each other when we were attentive to race than when we ignored race. Ironically, they saw efforts to focus on racial undertones in literature as limiting. Color-blind acquiescence was, presumably, the only path to universality. As a faculty member, Morrison pursued the ideas articulated in <em>Playing in the Dark</em> off and on for more than five years with undergraduate and graduate students at Princeton and three William E. Massey Sr. Lectures at Harvard before ultimately publishing the lectures. As a writer, she experimented with removal of the racial codes from language in the short story \"Recitatif\" and again in the novel <em>Paradise</em>. Both projects foreshadow the work of \"unracing\" literature to which <em>A Mercy</em> commits itself.</p> <p>I do not think it is an overstatement to say that critics encouraged Morrison to double down on her examination of the role race plays in literature (really how...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Toni Morrison's A MercyA Meditation on Othering
  • Dana A. Williams (bio)

Toni Morrison has famously noted that her novels always begin with a question. In The Bluest Eye the question is How do we make sense of a young Black girl's longing for blue eyes at a moment when chants of "Black is beautiful" abound? In Paradise she asks, What happens when you strip away racial markers?—what's left of the story? In Love, we are prompted to wonder, What are the unintended consequences of integration? In A Mercy, the question is about place: What can we know about a place before the people who populated it were racialized?

In each instance, race/racism/racialization undergird the inquiry.1 That the relationship between literature and race is of especial significance to Morrison is evidenced throughout her fiction, in interviews, and, perhaps most aggressively, in her collection of essays and lectures Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, the first extended exploration of the question of race and literature (and literature's language) she offers us publicly. There she writes: "When does racial 'unconsciousness' or awareness of race enrich interpretive language, and when does it impoverish it? What does positing one's writerly self, in the wholly racialized society that is the United States, as unraced and all others as raced entail?" (Morrison, Playing xii). The queries here are meant to direct our attention to the ways American literature written by white authors often uses constructs of Blackness (characters, sounds, cultures, symbols, and the like) as narrative gearshifts—critical moments of discovery or change. This line of inquiry then leads to an interrogation of the ways the literary enterprise is or is not altruistic as a humanistic enterprise. "When, in a race-conscious culture," Morrison writes, "is that lofty goal actually approximated? When not and why?" (xiii). Her recognition of the fact that so much of early American literature reflected a worldview that linked individual freedom to racial oppression was also a recognition of the limits of this literature. [End Page 101] What would happen if a writer rejected this singular landscape and pursued one absent "the pressure that racialized societies level on the creative process" (xiii)? In its determination to commingle history and fiction to re-create the North American landscape before racism is codified, A Mercy takes up this challenge.2

Morrison's interest in the relation of race and literature and the ways racism compromises literature's potential to enact humanism has a long history. Years before publishing Playing in the Dark, Morrison evidenced an interest in the topic in the classroom, both as student and as teacher. She has noted often in interviews her determination to write a paper on race in Shakespeare as an undergraduate student at Howard University (and how that determination was thwarted). As a theater student under the guidance of Owen Dodson, John Lavelle, Anne Cooke, and James Butcher, Morrison had played the role of Queen Elizabeth in a production of Richard III. And she had observed Dodson's reinterpretation of that play as "Richard and the Three Queens." In short, she was attentive to the ways race informed Shakespeare's work. It would be years before professors and scholars would understand how such explorations taught us more about ourselves and each other when we were attentive to race than when we ignored race. Ironically, they saw efforts to focus on racial undertones in literature as limiting. Color-blind acquiescence was, presumably, the only path to universality. As a faculty member, Morrison pursued the ideas articulated in Playing in the Dark off and on for more than five years with undergraduate and graduate students at Princeton and three William E. Massey Sr. Lectures at Harvard before ultimately publishing the lectures. As a writer, she experimented with removal of the racial codes from language in the short story "Recitatif" and again in the novel Paradise. Both projects foreshadow the work of "unracing" literature to which A Mercy commits itself.

I do not think it is an overstatement to say that critics encouraged Morrison to double down on her examination of the role race plays in literature (really how...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
托尼-莫里森的《怜悯》:对他者化的沉思
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 托尼-莫里森的《怜悯》--关于 "他者化 "的沉思 丹娜-A-威廉姆斯(简历 托尼-莫里森曾说过,她的小说总是以一个问题开始。在《最蓝的眼睛》中,这个问题是:当 "黑人是美丽的 "的呼声此起彼伏的时候,我们如何理解一个黑人女孩对蓝眼睛的渴望?在《天堂》中,她问:如果剥去种族标记,会发生什么?在《爱》中,我们不禁要问:融合会带来哪些意想不到的后果?在《怜悯》中,问题是关于地方的:在一个地方的居民被种族化之前,我们能对这个地方了解多少?1 文学与种族之间的关系对莫里森具有特别重要的意义,这一点在她的小说、访谈以及她的散文集和演讲集《在黑暗中玩耍:白与文学想象》中都有所体现,这也许是她首次公开探讨种族与文学(以及文学语言)的问题。她在书中写道:"种族'无意识'或种族意识何时会丰富阐释语言,何时又会削弱阐释语言?在美国这个完全种族化的社会中,将作家自我定位为非种族,而将所有其他人定位为种族,这意味着什么?(莫里森,《游玩》xii)。这里的疑问意在引导我们关注白人作家所写的美国文学作品如何经常使用黑人的建构(人物、声音、文化、符号等)作为叙事的变速--发现或改变的关键时刻。这条线索进而引出对文学事业作为一项人文事业是否利他的拷问。"莫里森写道:"在一个具有种族意识的文化中,这一崇高目标何时才能实现?什么时候没有,为什么?"(xiii)。她认识到美国早期文学作品反映了一种将个人自由与种族压迫联系在一起的世界观,同时也认识到这种文学的局限性。[第 101 页完] 如果作家摒弃这种奇特的景观,追求一种没有 "种族化社会对创作过程施加的压力"(xiii)的景观,会发生什么呢?2 莫里森对种族与文学的关系以及种族主义如何损害文学表现人文主义潜力的兴趣由来已久。2 莫里森对种族与文学的关系以及种族主义如何损害文学体现人文主义的潜力的兴趣由来已久。在出版《在黑暗中嬉戏》之前,莫里森作为学生和教师在课堂上就表现出了对这一主题的兴趣。她经常在访谈中提到自己在霍华德大学读本科时决心撰写一篇关于莎士比亚作品中的种族问题的论文(以及这一决心是如何受挫的)。作为一名戏剧系学生,在欧文-多德森、约翰-拉威尔、安妮-库克和詹姆斯-布彻的指导下,莫里森曾在一部《理查三世》中扮演伊丽莎白女王。她还观看了多德森将该剧重新演绎为 "理查德与三位王后 "的过程。总之,她非常关注莎士比亚作品中的种族因素。多年之后,教授和学者们才会明白,当我们关注种族问题时,这种探索会比我们忽视种族问题时更能让我们了解自己和彼此。具有讽刺意味的是,他们认为关注文学作品中的种族色彩是一种限制。肤色盲从大概是通往普遍性的唯一途径。作为一名教师,莫里森与普林斯顿大学的本科生和研究生一起,在五年多的时间里断断续续地研究了《在黑暗中游戏》一书中阐述的观点,并在哈佛大学举办了三次威廉-梅西讲座,最终出版了该讲座。作为一名作家,她曾在短篇小说《Recitatif》和长篇小说《天堂》中尝试从语言中删除种族代码。这两个项目都预示了《怜悯》所致力于的 "去种族化 "文学工作。我认为,评论家们鼓励莫里森加倍努力研究种族在文学中扮演的角色(真的是如何......)并不为过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1