Devaluing personhood: The framing of migrants in the EU's new pact on migration and asylum

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1111/tran.12676
Jouni Häkli, Gintarė Kudžmaitė, Kirsi Pauliina Kallio
{"title":"Devaluing personhood: The framing of migrants in the EU's new pact on migration and asylum","authors":"Jouni Häkli, Gintarė Kudžmaitė, Kirsi Pauliina Kallio","doi":"10.1111/tran.12676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest EU policy initiative to regulate migration to the European Union is called the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Compared with previous policies, the New Pact promotes and normalises multiple procedures that can have far-reaching consequences on migrants' agency, dignity, personhood, and vulnerability. As the EU's migration and asylum policies set the parameters for the governance of forced migration and access to asylum in the Member States, they also provide framings for the practical encounters between asylum seekers and the migration regime. These framings legitimise certain approaches to the management of asylum migration and the related interpretations of international human rights treaties both in the Member States and in the EU. By examining how migrants and their encounters with the EU are discussed and represented in the New Pact, we join the critical scholarship that has questioned the EU's supposed turn towards a more humane approach to migration. Examining the official voice of the EU, we conduct a critical policy analysis with a focus on terminology and framing, exploring three major frames through which the New Pact characterises migrants as part of its attempt to transform European asylum and migration governance. These frames relate to human classification, spatial coordination, and temporal control, each of which is linked to the management of encounters between migrants and the migration regime. We conclude by discussing what the New Pact's framing reveals about the EU's approaches to human vulnerability, dignity, agency, and (de)valued personhood.","PeriodicalId":48278,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest EU policy initiative to regulate migration to the European Union is called the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Compared with previous policies, the New Pact promotes and normalises multiple procedures that can have far-reaching consequences on migrants' agency, dignity, personhood, and vulnerability. As the EU's migration and asylum policies set the parameters for the governance of forced migration and access to asylum in the Member States, they also provide framings for the practical encounters between asylum seekers and the migration regime. These framings legitimise certain approaches to the management of asylum migration and the related interpretations of international human rights treaties both in the Member States and in the EU. By examining how migrants and their encounters with the EU are discussed and represented in the New Pact, we join the critical scholarship that has questioned the EU's supposed turn towards a more humane approach to migration. Examining the official voice of the EU, we conduct a critical policy analysis with a focus on terminology and framing, exploring three major frames through which the New Pact characterises migrants as part of its attempt to transform European asylum and migration governance. These frames relate to human classification, spatial coordination, and temporal control, each of which is linked to the management of encounters between migrants and the migration regime. We conclude by discussing what the New Pact's framing reveals about the EU's approaches to human vulnerability, dignity, agency, and (de)valued personhood.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贬低人格:欧盟关于移民和庇护的新契约中的移民框架
欧盟为规范向欧盟移民而采取的最新政策举措被称为《移民与庇护新契约》。与以往的政策相比,《新契约》促进并规范了多种程序,这些程序可能会对移民的代理权、尊严、人格和脆弱性产生深远影响。由于欧盟的移民和庇护政策为成员国管理强迫移民和获得庇护设定了参数,它们也为寻求庇护者和移民制度之间的实际接触提供了框架。这些框架使某些管理庇护移民的方法以及成员国和欧盟对国际人权条约的相关解释合法化。通过研究《新契约》是如何讨论移民及其与欧盟的关系的,我们加入了批判性学术研究的行列,质疑欧盟在移民问题上所谓的更人性化的转变。通过研究欧盟的官方声音,我们以术语和框架为重点进行了批判性的政策分析,探讨了《新契约》在试图改变欧洲庇护和移民管理时描述移民特征的三个主要框架。这些框架涉及人员分类、空间协调和时间控制,其中每个框架都与移民和移民制度之间的遭遇管理有关。最后,我们将讨论《新契约》的框架揭示了欧盟对人类脆弱性、尊严、代理权和(去)人格价值的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Transactions is one of the foremost international journals of geographical research. It publishes the very best scholarship from around the world and across the whole spectrum of research in the discipline. In particular, the distinctive role of the journal is to: • Publish "landmark· articles that make a major theoretical, conceptual or empirical contribution to the advancement of geography as an academic discipline. • Stimulate and shape research agendas in human and physical geography. • Publish articles, "Boundary crossing" essays and commentaries that are international and interdisciplinary in their scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Metabolic politics: A comparative synthesis Losing control: REF 2029 and the downgrading of academic outputs Mapping, geography Geographies of slavery in the Les Malouines/Las Malvinas/Falklands Islands: The Maroon connection The joy of maps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1