Agroforestry systems affect soil organic carbon stocks and fractions in deforested landscapes of Amazonia

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s10457-023-00949-6
Juan Carlos Suárez, Milena Segura, Hernán J. Andrade
{"title":"Agroforestry systems affect soil organic carbon stocks and fractions in deforested landscapes of Amazonia","authors":"Juan Carlos Suárez, Milena Segura, Hernán J. Andrade","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00949-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the main component of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems and an indicator of soil quality. The study aimed to investigate the stock and vertical distribution of SOC fractions and the SOC sequestration of different agroforestry systems (AFS) and other land uses in the Colombian Amazon. In each land use (Secondary forest—SF, Natural regeneration—NR, Alley cropping 1—AC1, Alley cropping 2—AC2, Forest plantations 1—FP1, Forest plantations 2—FP2, Crops in forest plantation—CFP, Shade trees for crops—STC, Homegarden—HG, Silvopastoral system—SPS and Pasture—P), four soil pits were made (1 × 1 × 1 m) to collect soil samples to determine SOC concentration by carbon lability fractions (C<sub>VL</sub>: very labile, C<sub>L</sub>: labile, C<sub>LL</sub>: less labile, C<sub>NL</sub>: non-labile) and bulk density at four depths (0—10, 10–20, 20–40 and 40–100 cm). The mean SOC concentration was 15.3 ± 1.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, with a higher concentration in 0–10 cm (26.1 ± 2.4 g kg<sup>−1</sup>). The concentration of the different fractions presented the following order C<sub>VL</sub> &gt; C<sub>NL</sub> &gt; C<sub>L</sub> &gt; C<sub>LL</sub> (7.4 ± 0.3, 4.8 ± 0.2, 2.7 ± 0.1 and 2.1 ± 0.1 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). SOC stock was 13.3 to 220.0 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> in the 0–100 cm layers, where FP1, FP2, AC1 and AC2 showed the highest values (174.0 to 199.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). In contrast, HG, P and STC showed the lowest values with 134.0, 116.0 and 96.2 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Therefore, and due to the contribution of the most stable carbon fractions in the soil (C<sub>LL</sub> and C<sub>NL</sub>), land uses such as AC1 and AC2 presented the highest levels of carbon stability measured by the carbon management index. Therefore, the different land uses with agroforestry systems increased the amount and stability of carbon accumulated in the soil compared to pasture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00949-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the main component of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems and an indicator of soil quality. The study aimed to investigate the stock and vertical distribution of SOC fractions and the SOC sequestration of different agroforestry systems (AFS) and other land uses in the Colombian Amazon. In each land use (Secondary forest—SF, Natural regeneration—NR, Alley cropping 1—AC1, Alley cropping 2—AC2, Forest plantations 1—FP1, Forest plantations 2—FP2, Crops in forest plantation—CFP, Shade trees for crops—STC, Homegarden—HG, Silvopastoral system—SPS and Pasture—P), four soil pits were made (1 × 1 × 1 m) to collect soil samples to determine SOC concentration by carbon lability fractions (CVL: very labile, CL: labile, CLL: less labile, CNL: non-labile) and bulk density at four depths (0—10, 10–20, 20–40 and 40–100 cm). The mean SOC concentration was 15.3 ± 1.2 g kg−1, with a higher concentration in 0–10 cm (26.1 ± 2.4 g kg−1). The concentration of the different fractions presented the following order CVL > CNL > CL > CLL (7.4 ± 0.3, 4.8 ± 0.2, 2.7 ± 0.1 and 2.1 ± 0.1 g kg−1, respectively). SOC stock was 13.3 to 220.0 Mg C ha−1 in the 0–100 cm layers, where FP1, FP2, AC1 and AC2 showed the highest values (174.0 to 199.0 Mg ha−1). In contrast, HG, P and STC showed the lowest values with 134.0, 116.0 and 96.2 Mg ha−1, respectively. Therefore, and due to the contribution of the most stable carbon fractions in the soil (CLL and CNL), land uses such as AC1 and AC2 presented the highest levels of carbon stability measured by the carbon management index. Therefore, the different land uses with agroforestry systems increased the amount and stability of carbon accumulated in the soil compared to pasture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农林系统影响亚马孙流域毁林地貌的土壤有机碳储量和组分
土壤有机碳(SOC)是陆地生态系统中碳的主要成分,也是土壤质量的指标之一。本研究旨在调查哥伦比亚亚马逊地区不同农林系统(AFS)和其他土地利用方式的土壤有机碳储量和垂直分布以及土壤有机碳固存情况。在每种土地利用方式(次生林-SF、天然更新-NR、小巷种植 1-AC1、小巷种植 2-AC2、森林种植 1-FP1、森林种植 2-FP2、森林种植中的作物-CFP、作物遮荫树-STC、家庭园艺-HG、造林-畜牧系统-SPS 和牧场-P)中,制作了四个土壤坑(1 × 1 × 1 米)以收集土壤样本,并通过碳易变性分数(CVL:非常易变;CL:易变;P:易变)测定 SOC 浓度:CVL:极易变;CL:易变;CLL:较易变;CNL:不易变)和容重测定四种深度(0-10 厘米、10-20 厘米、20-40 厘米和 40-100 厘米)的 SOC 浓度。平均 SOC 浓度为 15.3 ± 1.2 g kg-1,0-10 厘米处浓度较高(26.1 ± 2.4 g kg-1)。不同馏分的浓度依次为 CVL > CNL > CL > CLL(分别为 7.4 ± 0.3、4.8 ± 0.2、2.7 ± 0.1 和 2.1 ± 0.1 g kg-1)。在 0-100 厘米土层中,SOC 储量为 13.3 至 220.0 兆克 C ha-1,其中 FP1、FP2、AC1 和 AC2 的值最高(174.0 至 199.0 兆克 ha-1)。相比之下,HG、P 和 STC 的值最低,分别为 134.0、116.0 和 96.2 毫克/公顷-1。因此,由于土壤中最稳定的碳组分(CLL 和 CNL)的贡献,以碳管理指数衡量,AC1 和 AC2 等土地利用方式的碳稳定性水平最高。因此,与牧场相比,农林系统的不同土地利用方式增加了土壤中碳积累的数量和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Improving the precision of estimating carbon sequestration potential in four tree and shrub agroforestry species through the comparison of general and specific allometric equations in Côte d’Ivoire Soil quality indicators under five different cacao production systems and fallow in Alto Beni, Bolivia Variables related to soil fertility in successional agroforestry systems: Serras do Sudeste, RS, Brazil Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results The ties that bind: how trees can enhance agroecological transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1