{"title":"The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War by J. Matthew Gallman (review)","authors":"Brie Swenson Arnold","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War</em> by J. Matthew Gallman <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brie Swenson Arnold (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War</em>. J. Matthew Gallman. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2021. ISBN: 978-0-8139-4656-6. 416 pp., cloth, $35.00. <p>In this thought-provoking volume, noted historian J. Matthew Gallman offers his latest look at aspects of the political and social dynamics of the Civil War North. The emphasis here is Northern Democrats: who remained a Democrat between 1860 and 1865 and why; how various individuals and the party as a whole defined what it meant to be a Democrat during this pivotal period; and how Democrats navigated being the opposition in the midst of a civil war. <strong>[End Page 76]</strong> Though a sizeable contingent of Northerners continued to be Democrats during the era of the ascendency of the Republican Party, secession and the exodus of Southern Democrats, and the Civil War, Northern Democrats have remained less studied and understood. <em>The Cacophony of Politics</em> substantially attends to that, especially when read alongside other volumes that are part of an uptick in attention to Northern Democrats. (See, for example, Jennifer Weber, <em>Copperheads: The Rise and Fall of Lincoln's Opponents in the North</em> [New York: Oxford University Press, 2006]; Michael Todd Landis, <em>Northern Men with Southern Loyalties: The Democratic Party and the Sectional Crisis</em> [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014]; Adam I. P. Smith, <em>The Stormy Present: Conservatism and the Problem of Slavery in Northern Politics, 1846–1865</em> [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017]; Joshua A. Lynn, <em>Preserving the White Man's Republic: Jacksonian Democracy, Race, and the Transformation of American Conservatism</em> [Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019]; and Lauren Haumesser, <em>The Democratic Collapse: How Gender Politics Broke a Party and a Nation, 1856–1861</em> [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022]. For the foundational study on the topic, see Jean Baker, <em>Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century</em> [1983; repr., New York: Fordham University Press, 1998]). Gallman wants to understand the \"men and women who did not see eye to eye with Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party\" and what those \"more ideologically conservative\" Northerners meant by terms like <em>loyalty, Union, Constitution</em>, and <em>Democrat</em> (9, 10). As members of the party of the opposition during a civil war, Northern Democrats also ran up against and helped to define the boundaries of acceptable wartime dissent.</p> <p>To tell this story, the book does not follow typical conventions: it is simultaneously a drawing together of Gallman's prior work as well as a new take, a synthesis as well as a collection of case studies; its organizational structure toggles between \"a broad chronology\" and \"illustrative episodes\"; historiographic interventions are not (overtly) attempted; and there is no central thesis (10–11). Instead, across the book's nine chapters Gallman explores several \"major observations\" and \"core arguments,\" which include the need to pay closer attention to labels (e.g., <em>War Democrat, Peace Democrat, Copperhead, loyal, racist</em>) and the ways Northern Democrats have been categorized; the fact that politics was everywhere during the Civil War era; the ways location and timing influenced political beliefs; the complexities of civil liberties during the wartime moment; and the role of race and ethnicity in wartime politics (11–16). To pinpoint Democrats' beliefs, Gallman draws on traditional sources like newspapers, speeches, party platforms, and private correspondence as well <strong>[End Page 77]</strong> as established sources read in new ways (especially cleverly, district provost marshal reports) and sources beyond the written word (e.g., mobs, fistfights, riots, arrests). The volume sparkles in its depiction of the nineteenth-century North as \"a world thick with politics\" and its expansive view of who and what was political, which adds further confirmation that partisan politics was never the exclusive province of politicians and was always influenced by an array of people in the streets, in households, and at the polls (13). We encounter famous party insiders like Stephen Douglas, George McClellan, Clement Vallandigham, Samuel Barlow, and Charles and Edward Ingersoll plus the Democratic rank and file, including Irish and German immigrants, farmwives, politicians' wives...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War by J. Matthew Gallman
Brie Swenson Arnold (bio)
The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War. J. Matthew Gallman. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2021. ISBN: 978-0-8139-4656-6. 416 pp., cloth, $35.00.
In this thought-provoking volume, noted historian J. Matthew Gallman offers his latest look at aspects of the political and social dynamics of the Civil War North. The emphasis here is Northern Democrats: who remained a Democrat between 1860 and 1865 and why; how various individuals and the party as a whole defined what it meant to be a Democrat during this pivotal period; and how Democrats navigated being the opposition in the midst of a civil war. [End Page 76] Though a sizeable contingent of Northerners continued to be Democrats during the era of the ascendency of the Republican Party, secession and the exodus of Southern Democrats, and the Civil War, Northern Democrats have remained less studied and understood. The Cacophony of Politics substantially attends to that, especially when read alongside other volumes that are part of an uptick in attention to Northern Democrats. (See, for example, Jennifer Weber, Copperheads: The Rise and Fall of Lincoln's Opponents in the North [New York: Oxford University Press, 2006]; Michael Todd Landis, Northern Men with Southern Loyalties: The Democratic Party and the Sectional Crisis [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014]; Adam I. P. Smith, The Stormy Present: Conservatism and the Problem of Slavery in Northern Politics, 1846–1865 [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017]; Joshua A. Lynn, Preserving the White Man's Republic: Jacksonian Democracy, Race, and the Transformation of American Conservatism [Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019]; and Lauren Haumesser, The Democratic Collapse: How Gender Politics Broke a Party and a Nation, 1856–1861 [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022]. For the foundational study on the topic, see Jean Baker, Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century [1983; repr., New York: Fordham University Press, 1998]). Gallman wants to understand the "men and women who did not see eye to eye with Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party" and what those "more ideologically conservative" Northerners meant by terms like loyalty, Union, Constitution, and Democrat (9, 10). As members of the party of the opposition during a civil war, Northern Democrats also ran up against and helped to define the boundaries of acceptable wartime dissent.
To tell this story, the book does not follow typical conventions: it is simultaneously a drawing together of Gallman's prior work as well as a new take, a synthesis as well as a collection of case studies; its organizational structure toggles between "a broad chronology" and "illustrative episodes"; historiographic interventions are not (overtly) attempted; and there is no central thesis (10–11). Instead, across the book's nine chapters Gallman explores several "major observations" and "core arguments," which include the need to pay closer attention to labels (e.g., War Democrat, Peace Democrat, Copperhead, loyal, racist) and the ways Northern Democrats have been categorized; the fact that politics was everywhere during the Civil War era; the ways location and timing influenced political beliefs; the complexities of civil liberties during the wartime moment; and the role of race and ethnicity in wartime politics (11–16). To pinpoint Democrats' beliefs, Gallman draws on traditional sources like newspapers, speeches, party platforms, and private correspondence as well [End Page 77] as established sources read in new ways (especially cleverly, district provost marshal reports) and sources beyond the written word (e.g., mobs, fistfights, riots, arrests). The volume sparkles in its depiction of the nineteenth-century North as "a world thick with politics" and its expansive view of who and what was political, which adds further confirmation that partisan politics was never the exclusive province of politicians and was always influenced by an array of people in the streets, in households, and at the polls (13). We encounter famous party insiders like Stephen Douglas, George McClellan, Clement Vallandigham, Samuel Barlow, and Charles and Edward Ingersoll plus the Democratic rank and file, including Irish and German immigrants, farmwives, politicians' wives...
政治的杂音:马修-加尔曼(J. Matthew Gallman)著的《北方民主党人与美国内战》(评论
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The Cacophony of Politics:马修-加尔曼(J. Matthew Gallman)著,布里-斯文森-阿诺德(Brie Swenson Arnold)(简历)《喧嚣的政治:北方民主党人与美国内战》(The Cacophony of Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War):北方民主党人与美国内战》。J. Matthew Gallman 著。夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2021 年。ISBN:978-0-8139-4656-6。416 页,布面,35.00 美元。在这本发人深省的书中,著名历史学家马修-加尔曼(J. Matthew Gallman)对南北战争时期北方的政治和社会动态进行了最新的研究。本书的重点是北方民主党人:在 1860 年至 1865 年期间,谁仍然是民主党人,为什么;在这一关键时期,不同的个人和整个党派如何定义民主党人的含义;以及民主党人如何在内战中成为反对党。[虽然在共和党崛起、分裂和南方民主党人出走以及内战期间,相当一部分北方人仍然是民主党人,但对北方民主党人的研究和了解仍然较少。政治的喧哗》在很大程度上解决了这一问题,尤其是在与其他书卷一起阅读时,这些书卷是关注北方民主党人热潮的一部分。(例如,参见詹妮弗-韦伯(Jennifer Weber)的《铜头党》(Copperheads:The Rise and Fall of Lincoln's Opponents in the North [New York: Oxford University Press, 2006];Michael Todd Landis, Northern Men with Southern Loyalties:The Democratic Party and the Sectional Crisis [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014];Adam I. P. Smith, The Stormy Present:保守主义与 1846-1865 年北方政治中的奴隶制问题》[Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017];Joshua A. Lynn, Preserving the White Man's Republic:杰克逊民主、种族和美国保守主义的转变》[夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2019 年];劳伦-豪梅瑟:《民主党的崩溃:How Gender Politics Broke a Party and a Nation, 1856-1861 [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022]。关于该主题的奠基性研究,见 Jean Baker, Affairs of Party:The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century [1983; repr.)加尔曼希望了解那些 "与亚伯拉罕-林肯和共和党意见相左的男男女女",以及那些 "意识形态较为保守 "的北方人对忠诚、联盟、宪法和民主党等术语的理解(9, 10)。作为内战期间反对党的成员,北方民主党人也遇到了挑战,并帮助界定了战时可接受的异议的界限。为了讲述这个故事,该书并没有遵循典型的惯例:它既是对加尔曼之前工作的总结,也是一个新的尝试;既是一个综合,也是一个案例研究的集合;其组织结构在 "广泛的年表 "和 "说明性事件 "之间切换;没有(公开)尝试历史学干预;也没有中心论点(10-11)。相反,在本书的九个章节中,盖尔曼探讨了几个 "主要观点 "和 "核心论点",其中包括需要更密切地关注标签(如战争民主党人、和平民主党人、铜头党人、忠诚党人、种族主义者)以及北方民主党人被归类的方式;内战时期政治无处不在这一事实;地点和时间对政治信仰的影响;战时公民自由的复杂性;以及种族和民族在战时政治中的作用(11-16)。为了准确定位民主党人的信仰,盖尔曼利用了报纸、演讲稿、党纲和私人信件等传统资料,以及 [End Page 77] 以新方式解读的既有资料(尤其是地区宪兵司令报告)和书面文字以外的资料(如暴民、拳击、骚乱、逮捕)。该书将十九世纪的北方描绘成 "一个充满政治的世界",并对政治人物和政治事物进行了广阔的阐述,进一步证实了党派政治从来不是政治家的专利,它始终受到街头、家庭和投票站中各种人群的影响(13)。我们遇到了斯蒂芬-道格拉斯、乔治-麦克莱伦、克莱门特-瓦兰迪格姆、塞缪尔-巴洛、查尔斯和爱德华-英格索尔等著名的党内人士,以及民主党的普通群众,包括爱尔兰和德国移民、农妇、政治家的妻子......
期刊介绍:
Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.