{"title":"Classification of geogrid reinforcement in aggregate using machine learning techniques","authors":"Samuel Olamide Aregbesola, Yong-Hoon Byun","doi":"10.1186/s40703-024-00206-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study proposes a novel ML methodology for differentiating between unstabilized aggregate specimens and those stabilized with triangular and rectangular aperture geogrids. This study utilizes the compiled experimental results obtained from stabilized and unstabilized specimens under repeated loading into a balanced, moderate-sized database. The efficacy of five ML models, including tree-ensemble and single-learning algorithms, in accurately identifying each specimen class was explored. Shapley’s additive explanation was used to understand the intricacies of the models and determine global feature importance ranking of the input variables. All the models could identify the unstabilized specimen with an accuracy of at least 0.9. The tree-ensemble models outperformed the single-learning models when all three classes (unstabilized specimens and specimens stabilized by triangular and rectangular aperture geogrids) were considered, with the light gradient boosting machine showing the best performance—an accuracy of 0.94 and an area under the curve score of 0.98. According to Shapley’s additive explanation, the resilient modulus and confining pressure were identified as the most important features across all models. Therefore, the proposed ML methodology may be effectively used to determine the type and presence of geogrid reinforcement in aggregates, based on a few aggregate material properties and performance under repeated loading.</p>","PeriodicalId":44851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geo-Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geo-Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-024-00206-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study proposes a novel ML methodology for differentiating between unstabilized aggregate specimens and those stabilized with triangular and rectangular aperture geogrids. This study utilizes the compiled experimental results obtained from stabilized and unstabilized specimens under repeated loading into a balanced, moderate-sized database. The efficacy of five ML models, including tree-ensemble and single-learning algorithms, in accurately identifying each specimen class was explored. Shapley’s additive explanation was used to understand the intricacies of the models and determine global feature importance ranking of the input variables. All the models could identify the unstabilized specimen with an accuracy of at least 0.9. The tree-ensemble models outperformed the single-learning models when all three classes (unstabilized specimens and specimens stabilized by triangular and rectangular aperture geogrids) were considered, with the light gradient boosting machine showing the best performance—an accuracy of 0.94 and an area under the curve score of 0.98. According to Shapley’s additive explanation, the resilient modulus and confining pressure were identified as the most important features across all models. Therefore, the proposed ML methodology may be effectively used to determine the type and presence of geogrid reinforcement in aggregates, based on a few aggregate material properties and performance under repeated loading.
本研究提出了一种新颖的 ML 方法,用于区分未稳定的集料试样和使用三角形和矩形孔径土工格栅稳定的试样。本研究将稳定试样和非稳定试样在重复加载条件下获得的实验结果汇编到一个均衡、中等规模的数据库中。研究探讨了五种 ML 模型(包括树状集合算法和单一学习算法)在准确识别每个试样类别方面的功效。为了了解模型的复杂性并确定输入变量的全局特征重要性排序,我们使用了 Shapley 相加解释。所有模型都能以至少 0.9 的准确率识别非稳定标本。在考虑所有三个类别(未加固试样以及通过三角形和矩形孔径土工格栅加固的试样)时,树状集合模型的表现优于单一学习模型,其中光梯度增强机表现最佳--准确率为 0.94,曲线下面积为 0.98。根据 Shapley 的加法解释,弹性模量和约束压力被认为是所有模型中最重要的特征。因此,根据一些骨料的材料特性和在重复加载下的性能,建议的 ML 方法可有效用于确定骨料中土工格栅加固的类型和存在。