How to make a SPE resolution strategy work in the EU

Christian Nowak, Anna Elisabeth Freiin von Preuschen-von Lewinski
{"title":"How to make a SPE resolution strategy work in the EU","authors":"Christian Nowak, Anna Elisabeth Freiin von Preuschen-von Lewinski","doi":"10.15375/zbb-2024-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When dealing with the resolution of a banking group under EU regulation there are two different approaches: Single point of entry (SPE) versus Multiple Point of Entry (MPE). In a MPE strategy, the resolution authority is taking separate resolution actions at the level of individual legal entities of the group. In a SPE strategy, the resolution authority is taking a resolution action at the level of a single entity, usually the parent undertaking, which, consequently, becomes the so called “resolution entity” building together with its subsidiaries the “resolution group”.\n The general idea in a SPE strategy is, that losses at subsidiary level are first streamed up to the parent undertaking (resolution entity), i. e. capital is streamed down from the parent undertaking to the subsidiary to cover its losses and ensure its recapitalisation. This leads to losses at the resolution entity level, which, if the resolution entity meets the conditions for resolution, are taken care of by applying resolution tools to the resolution entity. This procedure is not necessarily a two-step approach but could also be completed in one go. In the following, we focus on different ways to upstream losses from the subsidiary to the parent undertaking and to recapitalise the subsidiary.","PeriodicalId":509014,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2024-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When dealing with the resolution of a banking group under EU regulation there are two different approaches: Single point of entry (SPE) versus Multiple Point of Entry (MPE). In a MPE strategy, the resolution authority is taking separate resolution actions at the level of individual legal entities of the group. In a SPE strategy, the resolution authority is taking a resolution action at the level of a single entity, usually the parent undertaking, which, consequently, becomes the so called “resolution entity” building together with its subsidiaries the “resolution group”. The general idea in a SPE strategy is, that losses at subsidiary level are first streamed up to the parent undertaking (resolution entity), i. e. capital is streamed down from the parent undertaking to the subsidiary to cover its losses and ensure its recapitalisation. This leads to losses at the resolution entity level, which, if the resolution entity meets the conditions for resolution, are taken care of by applying resolution tools to the resolution entity. This procedure is not necessarily a two-step approach but could also be completed in one go. In the following, we focus on different ways to upstream losses from the subsidiary to the parent undertaking and to recapitalise the subsidiary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在欧盟实施 SPE 解决战略
在根据欧盟法规处理银行集团解散问题时,有两种不同的方法:单点进入 (SPE) 和多点进入 (MPE)。在 MPE 战略中,破产管理机构在集团单个法律实体层面采取单独的破产行动。在 SPE 战略中,监管机构在单个实体(通常是母企业)层面采取监管行动,因此母企业成为所谓的 "监管实体",与其子公司一起组成 "监管集团"。SPE 战略的总体思路是,子公司层面的损失首先流向母企业(解 决实体),即资本从母企业流向子公司,以弥补其损失并确保其资本重组。这将导致解决实体层面的损失,如果解决实体符合解决条件,则通过对解决实体采用解决工具来解决。这一程序不一定分两步走,也可以一次性完成。下面,我们将重点讨论将子公司的损失上溯至母公司并对子公司进行资本重组的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SRB Legal Conference 2023: EU and Banking Union Law in a European and Global Context Panel II – Bank Resolution and Fundamental Rights Panel III – Cross-Border Bank Resolutions and its challenges Bank Resolution and Fundamental Rights Bank Resolution and the European Convention on Human Rights – A Note from the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1